Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access

Biochemical characterization of malate synthase G of P. aeruginosa

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
BMC Biochemistry200910:20

  • Received: 20 February 2009
  • Accepted: 24 June 2009
  • Published:



Malate synthase catalyzes the second step of the glyoxylate bypass, the condensation of acetyl coenzyme A and glyoxylate to form malate and coenzyme A (CoA). In several microorganisms, the glyoxylate bypass is of general importance to microbial pathogenesis. The predicted malate synthase G of Pseudomonas aeruginosa has also been implicated in virulence of this opportunistic pathogen.


Here, we report the verification of the malate synthase activity of this predicted protein and its recombinant production in E. coli, purification and biochemical characterization. The malate synthase G of P. aeruginosa PAO1 has a temperature and pH optimum of 37.5°C and 8.5, respectively. Although displaying normal thermal stability, the enzyme was stable up to incubation at pH 11. The following kinetic parameters of P. aeruginosa PAO1 malate synthase G were obtained: Km glyoxylate (70 μM), Km acetyl CoA (12 μM) and Vmax (16.5 μmol/minutes/mg enzyme). In addition, deletion of the corresponding gene showed that it is a prerequisite for growth on acetate as sole carbon source.


The implication of the glyoxylate bypass in the pathology of various microorganisms makes malate synthase G an attractive new target for antibacterial therapy. The purification procedure and biochemical characterization assist in the development of antibacterial components directed against this target in P. aeruginosa.


  • Sole Carbon Source
  • Glyoxylate
  • Glyoxylate Cycle
  • Glyoxylate Bypass
  • Free Thiol Group


Malate synthase catalyzes the condensation of acetyl coenzyme A and glyoxylate to form malate and coenzyme A (CoA) [1]. Along with isocitrate lyase, which catalyses the aldol cleavage of isocitrate to succinate and glyoxylate, this enzyme constitutes the glyoxylate bypass of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle [2]. Apart from replenishing the TCA cycle intermediates (anaplerotic role), the glyoxylate cycle is essential for growth on acetyl CoA (from fatty acids or from acetate) as a sole carbon source by bypassing two decarboxylation steps of the TCA cycle. Therefore, the carbon imported in the glyoxylate cycle as acetyl is not lost as CO2 – as would happen in the TCA cycle – but incorporated into intermediates of the cycle, which are available for anabolism. The net result is the conversion of two molecules acetyl CoA into one molecule of succinate. Because the glyoxylate cycle includes two oxidative steps, it also provides some energy [2].

Recently, Fischer and Sauer reported that malate synthase is an important component of the phosphoenolpyruvate-glyoxylate cycle in Escherichia coli, which functions under conditions of glucose hunger [3]. In addition, it serves an anaplerotic role in glycolate oxidation [4, 5]. In several microorganisms, the glyoxylate bypass is of general importance to microbial pathogenesis. Persistence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is facilitated by the glyoxylate bypass [6], whereas this metabolic pathway is required for high virulence of Candida albicans [7]. The ability of these organisms to utilize fatty acids as a carbon and energy source seems crucial to their survival in the infected host. Although it is widely accepted that the glyoxylate cycle operates in bacteria, fungi, some protists, and plants, the claim that the glyoxylate cycle is functionally active in higher animals remains controversial [8]. In E. coli two isoenzymes have been identified: aceB encodes the malate synthase A involved in acetate metabolism whereas glcB encodes the malate synthase G (MSG) involved in glycolate metabolism [9, 10]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is predicted to encode MSG (glcB or PA0482 gene) but not type A [11].

The expression of glcB of P. aeruginosa is upregulated during infection [12] and the malate synthase activity is implicated in twitching-mediated chemotaxis towards phospholipids and fatty acids [13]. Both elements suggest the importance of the glyoxylate bypass in the pathogenesis of P. aeruginosa. In view of possible applications in the development of novel antibiotics against P. aeruginosa, we have characterized the MSG of this opportunistic pathogen endowed with strong antibiotic resistance [14, 15].


Deletion of the P. aeruginosa gene encoding MSG

The glcB gene of P. aeruginosa PAO1 encoding MSG was deleted by double homologous recombination. P. aeruginosa PAO1 ΔglcB is able to grow on rich medium (LB medium), although with slightly reduced efficiency of plating, compared to the wild type strain (Figure 1). The deletion mutant was unable to produce colonies on medium with acetate as the sole carbon source, confirming the essential nature of the malate synthase for growth on acetate and the prediction of a single MSG gene (Figure 1). The reduced efficiency of plating of wild type P. aeruginosa and the reduced colony size on media with acetate indicate suboptimal growth of wild type P. aeruginosa on acetate.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Inability of the MSG deletion mutant to grow on acetate as sole carbon source. P. aeruginosa PAO1 wild type (PAO1) and the MSG deletion mutant (PAO1 ΔPA0482) were spotted on (A) LB and (B) minimal medium with acetate as sole carbon source in a tenfold dilution series.

Recombinant production and purification of MSG

The MSG was produced recombinantly fused to a glutathione S-transferase (GST) tag. The protein was purified to homogeneity by subsequent glutathione affinity chromatography, proteolytic removal of the GST tag and anion exchange chromatography. Approximately 45 mg of MSG was purified per liter of culture broth. The predicted molecular weight of the fusion protein (959 amino acids, 105.9 kDa) as well as MSG (733 amino acids, 79.4 kDa) corresponds well to the observed bands on gel (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Recombinant production and purification of the malate synthase G of P. aeruginosa PAO1. (A) purification of malate synthase G after removal of the GST tag is shown and (B) after anion exchange chromatography (AEC). Samples from purified Gst-malate synthase fusion protein (Gst-PA0482), samples from the uninduced (UI) and induced (I) cultures are compared to the elution fractions (E1 to 5) after glutathione purification with removal of the GST tag and anion exchange chromatography. The amounts are not proportional between A and B. The low molecular weight ladder (LMW) served as reference for both gels (the molecular weight of the markers is indicated in kDa).

Influence of temperature on the activity and stability of MSG

Both the temperature optimum and the thermal stability of the MSG activity were investigated. To achieve a higher resolution, the zone of highest activity was measured at smaller temperature intervals (2.5°C). Maximal activity occurs at 37.5°C (Figure 3A); between 32.5 and 40°C more than 90% of the activity remains. At lower temperatures, this activity decreases steadily, but does not drop to zero. At 5°C and 15°C, 15.5% and 47.1% of the activity remained, respectively. Above 47.5°C the activity dropped fast and was not significantly different from zero at 65°C and 75°C (two tailed t-test, P = 0.99) (Figure 3A).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Influence of the temperature and pH on MSG activity. The malate synthase activity was expressed relative to the activity at 37.5°C or pH8 for (A) the temperature and (C) pH optimum, respectively. (B) Temperature and (D) pH stability were expressed relative to the activity after a preincubation at a temperature of 4°C or pH 7, respectively.

The thermal stability of MSG was examined by preincubating the enzyme for one hour at a given temperature and subsequently assaying the enzymatic activity at 37.5°C as described in the previous paragraph. Preincubation of MSG at 40°C or lower temperatures did not result in reduced enzymatic activity (Figure 3B). After one hour preincubation at 55°C, enzymatic activity was approximately halved (53% drop). Higher preincubation temperatures (70°C, 85°C and 99°C) caused complete loss of malate synthase activity (Figure 3B).

Influence of pH on the activity and stability of MSG

The pH optimum of MSG was investigated using standard conditions (an incubation temperature of 37°C). To eliminate a possible influence of the buffering components on the enzymatic activity, a universal buffer containing three different buffering agents (citrate, Tris and borate) was used. The MSG activity is maximal between pH 8 and 9 (Figure 3C). At a pH of 7 and 10, 87 and 85% of the activity is retained, respectively. However, outside this pH range (below pH 7 and above pH 10) the activity decreases fast. Below pH 6 no activity remains (Figure 3C).

The pH dependency of MSG stability was determined by preincubation of the enzyme for one hour at a specific pH and subsequently diluting the enzyme 100-fold before assaying the enzymatic activity at pH 7.5. Stability of MSG was maximal after a preincubation at pH 6 and 7 (Figure 3D). When preincubating the enzyme in more basic buffer (pH 8 to pH 11), the stability gradually dropped (at pH 11, still 90% of the activity was retained). The enzymatic activity was lost upon preincubation at lower (≤ pH 5) or higher pH values (≥ pH 12) (Figure 3D).

MSG is susceptible to inhibition by pyruvate

The inhibitory potential of pyruvate on the activity of the MSG of P. aeruginosa was shown by adding a twofold dilution series of pyruvate to a constant amount of MSG and a constant amount of substrate. The malate synthase activity dropped with increasing pyruvate concentration (Figure 4), showing that pyruvate also acts as an inhibitor of the P. aeruginosa MSG.
Figure 4
Figure 4

The influence of pyruvate on the malate synthase activity. The relative activity of malate synthase G is shown in function of the pyruvate concentration (in mM). The reaction without pyruvate (indicated by the black arrow) serves as reference.

Kinetic parameters of MSG

To determine the kinetic parameters of MSG, the enzymatic reaction was followed over time. Different combinations of substrate (acetyl CoA and gloxylate) concentrations were assayed, whereas the other conditions remained constant (pH 7.5, 25°C, the amount of MSG). For each combination, the velocities were determined. The MSG-catalyzed reaction generated linear Lineweaver-Burk plots over the concentration range tested. Figure 5A shows these plots with respect to glyoxylate at various concentrations of acetyl CoA. Since this is a two-substrate reaction, determination of the actual parameters requires a secondary plot (Figure 5B). The formulas indicated in the figures allow calculation of kinetic parameters. The Km glyoxylate(70 μM), Km acetyl CoA (12 μM) and Vmax (16.5 μmol/minutes/mg MSG) of the P. aeruginosa PAO1 MSG are comparable to those of other malate synthases available from literature (Table 1, [1621]).
Figure 5
Figure 5

Determination of the kinetic parameters of malate synthase G of P. aeruginosa. The formulas for the calculation of the kinetic parameters are indicated. In the formulas, subscript A and B refer to glyoxylate and acetyl CoA, respectively. (A) The primary Lineweaver-Burk plots show reciprocal velocity (minutes/nmol) in function of the reciprocal glyoxylate concentration (in μM-1). Each line represents a concentration of acetyl CoA: 200 (black diamond), 100 (black square), 50 (black triangle), 25 (black X), 15 μM (black dot). R2 of the trendlines are 0.995, 0.999, 0.989, 0.996 and 0.982, respectively. (B) The secondary plot gives the reciprocal apparent velocities (in minutes/nmol) as a function of the reciprocal acetyl CoA concentration (in μM-1). The R2 of the trendline is 0.9781.

Table 1

Comparison of the kinetic parameters of malate synthases of the organisms listed.



Km glyoxylaat (μM)

Km acetyl-CoA (μM)

Vmax (μmol/min/mg)


P. aeruginosa





This work

M. tuberculosis






E. coli






Streptomyces coelicolor






S. clavuligerus






Corynebacterium glutamicum






Saccharomyces cerevisiae






Zea mays







Malate synthase is essential for the growth on acetate as a sole carbon source, which is in agreement with the prediction of a single malate synthase in P. aeruginosa. In addition, the deletion mutant shows somewhat reduced growth on rich medium, probably reflecting its anaplerotic role in the TCA cycle and its role in the phosphoenolpyruvate-glyoxylate cycle, as described by Fischer and Sauer [3]. An efficient and straightforward procedure for the purification of untagged MSG was developed. Removal of the GST tag rules out possible interference of the tag with the enzymatic activity of the enzyme. In addition, the quantity and the purity of the tagless enzyme are suitable for crystallography of P. aeruginosa MSG.

Subsequently, the purified MSG activity was characterized biochemically. The temperature optimum and stability show that the enzyme behaves like a typical mesophylic protein, since these parameters indicate a rapid and irreversible inactivation of MSG. The reduction in thermal stability from 55°C on is in agreement with the steep decline in enzymatic activity at this temperature. After all, instability decreases the amount of functional enzyme. However, reduction in enzymatic activity at 55°C (incubation for 30 minutes, reduction of 74%) is only partially explained by the thermal instability at 55°C (incubation for one hour, reduction of 53%). This suggests that a fraction of the protein is unfolded reversibly – and therefore temporarily inactive – before either denaturing irreversibly at this temperature or returning to its active state after cooling. The temperature optimum (37.5°C) and the considerable activity at lower temperatures (at 15°C nearly half of the activity remains) are in agreement with the microbial characteristics of P. aeruginosa as an opportunistic (human) pathogen and a common water and soil organism, respectively. With only 90% of the activity realized at the cytoplasmic pH, the pH optimum and stability of MSG seem somewhat shifted to a more basic pH range. The stability analysis suggests fast and irreversible denaturation of MSG outside the pH range from 6 to 11. The optimal pH for enzymatic activity (above 85%) was limited to a more narrow pH range (pH 7 to 11). In combination with the slightly reduced stability at pH 9 to 11, these data suggest that the actual pH optimum for the enzymatic activity is shifted somewhat further to a more basic pH compared to the apparent pH optimum (between 8 and 9). Since the enzyme functions intracellularly (at a periplasmic pH between 7.2 and 7.4) [22], the high activity at elevated pH is quite surprising. The reason for this remains to be elucidated, as data from other malate synthases is lacking. Possibly, this pattern can be explained by the catalytic mechanism of MSG and the residues involved. Based on sequence similarity with MSG of E. coli [17, 23] and M. tuberculosis [16, 24], Asp631 functions as a catalytic base, abstracting a proton from the terminal methyl group of acetyl CoA. The resulting negative enolate is stabilized by the positive charge of conserved Arg340. Glyoxylate is polarized for nucleophilic attack by the magnesium ion, which is essential for enzymatic activity. After nucleophilic attack of the enolate anion on glyoxylate, the resulting malyl-CoA intermediate is stabilized by Mg2+ and Arg340. Subsequently, this intermediate is hydrolyzed by a water molecule activated by Glu274 and/or Asp275. As a result, the products, malate and CoA, are released [16, 17, 23, 24]. The theoretical pKa's of the side chains of the catalytic residues (4.1 (Asp), 4.5 (Glu), 12.0 (Arg) in solution at 25°C) suggest that their charge probably remains unaltered over this pH range. However, the pKa can vary considerably (more than one pH unit) depending on the local environment of the amino acid side chain in the protein [25]. Alternatively, the charge of residues involved in substrate binding might change over this pH range. Likewise, charge changes of residues crucial to the structural stability of MSG could gravely affect the enzyme's structural stability at a pH outside the range between 6 and 11 and lead to (irreversible) denaturation. Future structural analysis of this MSG might provide more insight in the exact mechanisms involved. The inhibition of malate synthase G by pyruvate is probably competitive in nature, presumably by competition with glyoxylate [17].

The kinetic parameters of MSG of P. aeruginosa are comparable to those of the enzymes of other organisms (Table 1). Since the extended straight lines in the primary Lineweaver-Burk plot intersect approximately in one unique point, MSG proceeds through a ternary complex, which contains the enzyme in complex with both substrates, as opposed to a substituted enzyme mechanism, in which a group is transferred from the first substrate that leaves the complex before the second substrate binds. This is in agreement with the catalytic mechanism proposed for the E. coli [17, 23] and the M. tuberculosis MSG [16, 24] as is the case for most enzymes with two substrates catalyzing a group transfer [26].


The implication of the glyoxylate bypass in the pathology of various microorganisms makes MSG an attractive new target for antibacterial therapy [6, 7, 12]. What makes them especially appealing is that no genes encoding the enzymes of the glyoxylate bypass have been identified in mammals [8]. In addition, P. aeruginosa was shown to encode only a single malate synthase. The microbial and biochemical characterization of MSG of P. aeruginosa are an important step towards the development of antibacterials targeting this enzyme to combat antibiotic resistant P. aeruginosa infections. Future studies of the inhibition kinetics of pyruvate in combination with the elucidation of the crystal structure of MSG in complex with substrates, products and natural inhibitors will be instrumental to develop novel inhibition strategies.


Construction of the glcB deletion mutant

The construction of the deletion mutant was described previously [27]. Drops (2 μl) of a tenfold dilution series of an overnight culture of wildtype P. aeruginosa or the glcB deletion mutant were spotted on LB medium and M9 minimal medium. M9 minimal medium was composed of 11.28 g/l M9 salts (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA), 2 mM MgSO4 (Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium), 0.1 mM CaCl2 (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.5% w/v of acetate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) as the sole carbon source, and 1.5% w/v of agar (LabM).

Recombinant production of MSG in E. coli

The 2,175 bp open reading frame (ORF) encoding malate synthase G was PCR amplified (GoTaq DNA polymerase, 2.5 units, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) using the P. aeruginosa PAO1 genome as template and inserted in the multiple cloning site of pGEX-6P-1 (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). DNA sequence analysis confirmed the sequence of the inserted ORF and the reading-frame fusion with the coding sequence of N-terminal GST tag. The MSG and the GST tag are separated by the recognition sequence (LEVLFQGP) of the Prescission™ protease (GE Healthcare). E. coli BL21 cells containing the pGEX-6P-1-glcB construct were grown in 2xTY to an optical density (at 600 nm) of 0.6 and induced overnight at 16°C using 0.1 mM Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG).

In a first step, the recombinant protein was purified from cleared lysates on an Δkta FPLC (GE Healthcare) using a 5 ml GSTrap HP column (GE Healthcare) as described by the manufacturer. For proteolytic removal of the GST tag, elution was performed with 50 units of Prescission™ protease (GE Healthcare) after overnight on column incubation with the protease at 4°C. The next day, the released MSG was eluted (50 mM Tris.HCl, pH 7.5). Prior to the second purification step using anion exchange chromatography (AEC), the eluate resulting from the Prescission™ protease-based release from the GSTrap HP column was dialyzed against a triethanolamine buffer (20 mM pH 7.5). The sample was loaded on Q sepharose Fast Flow column (15 × 160 mm, GE Healthcare). After washing the column (200 ml at 2 ml/min), the proteins were eluted using a linear gradient of 0 to 0.5 M NaCl in 150 minutes (1 ml/min) and collected in 2 ml fractions. The purified fractions were pooled and dialyzed against a buffer compatible with the malate synthase activity assays (100 mM Tris.HCl, 5 mM MgCl2 at a pH of 7.5).

MSG activity assays

The temperature and pH optimum and stability, as well as the inhibition by pyruvate, were performed with an endpoint assay which measures the amount of CoA. The amount of free thiol groups of CoA was determined using 5, 5'-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) or DTNB (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)[5]. The absorption at 415 nm was measured in a microplate reader (Microplate reader model 680, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). DTNB was added to a final concentration of 2 mM. Addition of DTNB to the mixture arrests the reaction, probably due to reaction of the DTNB with the free thiol groups of cysteine [21]. The standard reaction mixture contains 280 ng MSG, 100 mM Tris.HCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM glyoxylate (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mM acetyl CoA (AppliChem GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). Unless stated otherwise, the reactions were incubated for 30 min at pH 7.5. To identify the pH optimum, reactions were buffered using a universal buffer spanning a pH range from 2 to 12 (30 mM citrate, 30 mM Tris, 30 mM borate). All experiments were conducted in triplicate. The error bars correspond to one standard deviation.

To determine the kinetic parameters of MSG, the reaction was followed over time by measuring the absorption of the acetyl thioester bond at 232 nm [21]. The assays were performed in transparent microplates (Greiner, Frickenhausen, Germany), incubated at 25°C and measured with a TECAN Infinite® M200 (TECAN, Zurich, Switzerland). Each reaction contained 10 μg of enzyme. All combinations of 15, 25, 50, 100 and 200 μM acetyl CoA with 40, 60, 80, 120 and 240 μM glyoxylate were assayed at 25°C and pH 7.5 in triplicate. The error bars correspond to one standard deviation. Kinetic parameters (Km and Vmax) were calculated from Lineweaver-Burk plots as described by Cornish-Bowden [26].



BR and NM hold a predoctoral fellowship of the "Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders" (IWT-Vlaanderen, Belgium and of the "Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen" (FWO-Vlaanderen, Belgium), respectively. This work was financially supported by the FWO-Vlaanderen research grant G.0323.09N.

Authors’ Affiliations

Division of Gene Technology, Department of Biosystems, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 21, box 2462, Leuven, BE-3001, Belgium
Laboratory for Pharmacotechnology and Biopharmacy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg O&N 2, Herestraat 49, Box 921, 3000 Leuven, Belgium


  1. Wong DTO, Ajl SJ: Conversion of acetate and glyoxylate to malate. J Am Chem Soc. 1956, 78: 3230-3231. 10.1021/ja01594a079.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kornberg HL, Krebs HA: Synthesis of cell constituents from C2-units by a modified tricarboxylic acid cycle. Nature. 1957, 179: 988-991. 10.1038/179988a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Fischer E, Sauer U: A novel metabolic cycle catalyzes glucose oxidation and anaplerosis in hungry Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 46446-46451. 10.1074/jbc.M307968200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kornberg HL, Sadler JR: Microbial oxidation of glycollate via a dicarboxylic acid cycle. Nature. 1960, 185: 153-155. 10.1038/185153a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ornston LN, Ornston MK: Regulation of glyoxylate metabolism in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1969, 98: 1098-1108.Google Scholar
  6. McKinney JD, Höner zu Bentrup K, Muñoz-Elías EJ, Miczak A, Chen B, Chan WT, Swenson D, Sacchettini JC, Jacobs WRJ, Russell DG: Persistence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in macrophages and mice requires the glyoxylate shunt enzyme isocitrate lyase. Nature. 2000, 406: 735-738. 10.1038/35021074.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lorenz MC, Fink GR: The glyoxylate cycle is required for fungal virulence. Nature. 2001, 412: 83-86. 10.1038/35083594.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kondrashov FA, Koonin EV, Morgunov IG, Finogenova TV, Kondrashova MN: Evolution of glyoxylate cycle enzymes in Metazoa: evidence of multiple horizontal transfer events and pseudogene formation. Biol Direct. 2006, 1: 31-10.1186/1745-6150-1-31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chung T, Klumpp DJ, LaPorte DC: Glyoxylate bypass operon of Escherichia coli: cloning and determination of the functional map. J Bacteriol. 1988, 170: 386-392.Google Scholar
  10. Molina I, Pellicer MT, Badia J, Aguilar J, Baldoma L: Molecular characterization of Escherichia coli malate synthase G. Differentiation with the malate synthase A isoenzyme. Eur J Biochem. 1994, 224: 541-548. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.00541.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Stover CK, Pham XQ, Erwin AL, Mizoguchi SD, Warrener P, Hickey MJ, Brinkman FS, Hufnagle WO, Kowalik DJ, Lagrou M, Garber RL, Goltry L, Tolentino E, Westbrock-Wadman S, Yuan Y, Brody LL, Coulter SN, Folger KR, Kas A, Larbig K, Lim R, Smith K, Spencer D, Wong GK, Wu Z, Paulsen IT, Reizer J, Saier MH, Hancock RE, Lory S, Olson MV: Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature. 2000, 406: 959-964. 10.1038/35023079.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ha U, Jin S: Expression of the soxR gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is inducible during infection of burn wounds in mice and is required to cause efficient bacteremia. Infect Immun. 1999, 67: 5324-5331.Google Scholar
  13. Miller RM, Tomaras AP, Barker AP, Voelker DR, Chan ED, Vasil AI, Vasil ML: Pseudomonas aeruginosa twitching motility-mediated chemotaxis towards phospholipids and fatty acids: specificity and metabolic requirements. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190: 4038-4049. 10.1128/JB.00129-08.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lyczak JB, Cannon CL, Pier GB: Establishment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: lessons from a versatile opportunist. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2: 1051-1060. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01259-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Obritsch MD, Fish DN, MacLaren R, Jung R: National surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from intensive care unit patients from 1993 to 2002. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004, 48: 4606-4610. 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4606-4610.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith CV, Huang C, Miczak A, Russell DG, Sacchettini JC, Höner zu Bentrup K: Biochemical and structural studies of malate synthase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 1735-1743. 10.1074/jbc.M209248200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Anstrom DM, Kallio K, Remington SJ: Structure of the Escherichia coli malate synthase G:pyruvate:acetyl-coenzyme A abortive ternary complex at 1.95 A resolution. Protein Sci. 2003, 12: 1822-1832. 10.1110/ps.03174303.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Loke P, Goh LL, Seng Soh B, Yeow P, Sim TS: Purification and characterization of recombinant malate synthase enzymes from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) and S. clavuligerus NRRL3585. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002, 28: 239-243. 10.1038/sj.jim.7000240.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Reinscheid DJ, Eikmanns BJ, Sahm H: Malate synthase from Corynebacterium glutamicum: sequence analysis of the gene and biochemical characterization of the enzyme. Microbiology. 1994, 140: 3099-3108. 10.1099/13500872-140-11-3099.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Durchschlag H, Biedermann G, Eggerer H: Large-scale purification and some properties of malate synthase from baker's yeast. Eur J Biochem. 1981, 114: 255-262. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb05144.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Beeckmans S, Khan AS, Kanarek L, Van Driessche E: Ligand binding on to maize (Zea mays) malate synthase: a structural study. Biochem J. 1994, 303: 413-421.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Urquhart BL, Atsalos TE, Roach D, Basseal DJ, Bjellqvist B, Britton WL, Humphery-Smith I: 'Proteomic contigs' of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis (BCG) using novel immobilised pH gradients. Electrophoresis. 1997, 18: 1384-1392. 10.1002/elps.1150180813.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Howard BR, Endrizzi JA, Remington SJ: Crystal structure of Escherichia coli malate synthase G complexed with magnesium and glyoxylate at 2.0 A resolution: mechanistic implications. Biochemistry. 2000, 39: 3156-3168. 10.1021/bi992519h.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Anstrom DM, Remington SJ: The product complex of M. tuberculosis malate synthase revisited. Protein Sci. 2006, 15: 2002-2007. 10.1110/ps.062300206.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Cornish-Bowden A: Effect of pH on Enzyme Activity. Fundamentals of enzyme kinetics. Edited by: Cornish-Bowden A. 2004, London: Portland Press Ltd, 213-228. 3Google Scholar
  26. Cornish-Bowden A: Reactions of More than One Substrate. Fundamentals of enzyme kinetics. Edited by: Cornish-Bowden A. 2004, London: Portland Press Ltd, 157-189. 3Google Scholar
  27. Roucourt B, Lecoutere E, Chibeu A, Hertveldt K, Volckaert G, Lavigne R: A procedure for systematic identification of bacteriophage-host interactions of P. aeruginosa phages. Virology. 2009, 387: 50-58. 10.1016/j.virol.2009.01.033.View ArticleGoogle Scholar