Skip to main content
Download PDF

Development of a sensitive non-radioactive protein kinase assay and its application for detecting DYRK activity in Xenopus laevis oocytes

BMC Biochemistry volume 11, Article number: 20 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Although numerous non-radioactive methods are in use to measure the catalytic activity of protein kinases, most require specialized equipment and reagents and are not sufficiently sensitive for the detection of endogenous kinase activity in biological samples. Kinases of the DYRK family have important functions in developmental and pathophysiological processes in eukaryotic organisms including mammals. We aimed to develop a highly sensitive, low-tech assay suitable to determine the activity of DYRK family kinases in tissues or cells from diverse sources.

Results

Phosphorylation-site specific antibodies can be used to monitor the accumulation of the phosphorylated product in kinase assays. We present a modified configuration of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based kinase assay by using the phosphospecific antibody as the capture antibody. This assay format allowed the detection of small amounts of phosphopeptide in mixtures with an excess of the unphosphorylated substrate peptide (10 fmol phosphorylated peptide over a background of 50 pmol unphosphorylated peptide). Consequently, low substrate turnover rates can be determined. We applied this method to the measurement of endogenous DYRK1A activity in mouse heart tissue by immunocomplex kinase assay. Furthermore, we detected DYRK1-like kinase activity in Xenopus laevis oocytes and identified this kinase as a DYRK1 isoform distinct from the Xenopus DYRK1A ortholog.

Conclusion

We present a non-radioactive and highly sensitive method for the measurement of endogenous activities of DYRKs in biological samples. Xenopus laevis oocytes contain an active DYRK1-related protein kinase more similar to mammalian DYRK1B than DYRK1A.

Background

Most cellular processes are controlled by protein phosphorylation, and aberrant kinase activity has been implicated in the etiology of a wide spectrum of diseases, including cancer, chronic inflammatory disorders and neurodegeneration. Studies on protein kinases are important not only to elucidate molecular mechanisms of signal transduction, but also for drug development. Therefore, methods for measuring kinase activity and for the identification of kinase inhibitors have become increasingly important in biomedical research [1, 2].

A widely employed type of assay is based on the use of radioactively labelled ATP as phosphate donor and subsequent detection of phosphate incorporation into a protein or peptide substrate that contains the respective kinase recognition motif [3, 4]. This radiometric technique is simple and suitable for detection of protein kinase activity with high sensitivity but depends on the use of radioactive isotopes (32P or 33P). Use of radioactivity requires special handling, is associated with inherent high costs of waste disposal, and restricts the flexibility because of the short half life of 32P and 33P. Furthermore, these assays are carried out at subphysiological levels of ATP owing to the necessity of keeping ATP levels, and thus the usage of radioisotopes, within reasonable limits.

To circumvent these drawbacks, a wide variety of non-radiometric techniques have been developed to measure kinase activity, particularly for use in high throughput screening of kinase inhibitors (for recent reviews see [1, 2]. Several non-radiometric methods rely on antibodies that can distinguish phosphorylated from unphosphorylated forms of the kinase substrates [5]. Such phosphorylation state-specific antibodies were first used by Yano et al. [6] to measure protein kinase activity by an ELISA method. In the original format, the in vitro-kinase reaction takes place in the wells after coating of the substrate to the surface of the microplate wells, and the phosphorylated molecules are detected with a phosphospecific antibody [6–8]. The use of biotinylated peptides allows the reaction to be performed in solution before the substrate captured on streptavidin coated plates [9, 10]. An inherent drawback of the existing ELISA-based assays is that in case of low enzymatic turnover, the large amount of unphosphorylated substrate will outcompete the phosphorylated substrate for binding to the surface of the wells. This decreases the overall sensitivity of the assay, and radiometric assays are generally preferred for detecting endogenous kinase activity.

Protein kinases of the DYRK family have been implicated in a number of important biological processes in diverse eukaryotic organisms, e.g. Pom1p in cell morphogenesis and mitotic entry in S. pombe [11, 12], MBK2 in oocyte maturation in C. elegans [13] and a DYRK1 isoform in Xenopus laevis oocyte maturation [14], minibrain (MNB) in neurogenesis in Drosophila [15], and DYRK1A in mammalian brain development and in neurodegeneration [16, 17]. Interestingly, alterations in neuronal development were observed in mouse models both with a selective gain or partial loss of function of Dyrk1A (for recent reviews see [17, 18]). This gene dosage effect implies that subtle changes in the activity of this DYRK family kinase can have severe consequences.

Many investigators are characterising the role of DYRKs in various biological processes or their involvement in human diseases [19–22]. For measuring the activity of DYRKs, radiometric assays are presently the standard in laboratory practice. We aimed at developing a non-radiometric assay sufficiently sensitive to measure kinase activity of endogenous DYRKs. By a modification of the existing ELISA configurations, we accomplished to reach a detection limit in the range of radiometric assays. The sensitivity of the assay was sufficient to measure the activity of DYRK1A in mouse heart. Moreover, we used the new method to characterize the activity of a DYRK1 isoform expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

Results

Development and characterization of the assay

Considering that the sensitivity in phospho-ELISA methods is mainly limited by the number of substrate binding sites available for immobilization, we reasoned that this problem could be overcome by using the phosphospecific antibody for capturing the small amounts of phosphopeptide from the complex reaction mixture. We decided to use a substrate peptide mimicking the sequence around Thr212 in the tau protein (also called microtubule-associated protein tau, MAPT). This is a well characterized phosphorylation site of DYRK1A [23, 24], and phosphospecific antibodies directed against this site are commercially available. We used a biotinylated substrate peptide to allow for colorimetric detection of the bound phosphopeptide with the help a streptavidin-HRP conjugate (Figure 1A). Concentrations of the capture antibody and the streptavidin-HRP conjugate were optimized to develop the standard protocol used in all experiments shown here (see Methods section).

Figure 1
figure 1

Direct sandwich ELISA format for the detection of the phosphorylated DYRK substrate peptide tau 207-219 . A, Scheme illustrating the principle of the assay. Bio, biotin; TMB, tetramethylbenzidine; HRP, horseradish peroxidase (coupled to streptavidin). B and C, Titration of phosphorylated and unphosphorylated tau207-219. The wells were coated with 100 ng anti tau(pT212) and loaded with dilution series of either phosphorylated or unphosphorylated tau207-219. The background signal from wells loaded only with the buffer was subtracted from all values. A representative experiment of three is shown. Panel C presents the same data as in panel B with a linear x-axis to visualize the linear range of the ELISA. The inset shows an enlargement of lower range. D, Titration of phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated tau207-219 on streptavidin-coated wells. Detection was performed with primary anti-tau(pT212) antibody and secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody coupled to HRP. The graph is representative of two experiments. E, Detection of phosphorylated tau207-219 in the presence of excess unphosphorylated peptide. Different amounts of phosphorylated tau207-219 (0.01 pmol, 0.1 pmol, 1 pmol) were mixed with a dilution series of unphosphorylated tau207-219 (12.5 - 100 pmol). Signals obtained in wells loaded only with the same amount of the unphosphorylated peptide were subtracted from the read-out of the mixtures. The graph is representative of two experiments. In B-E, error bars indicate the difference between duplicate wells.

Full size image

We performed a titration experiment to determine the key parameters of the assay, i.e. the power to discriminate between the phosphorylated and unphosphorylated biotinylated tau peptide (hereafter referred to as tau207-219), the absolute lower detection limit, and the linear range of the assay. As shown in Figure 1B, the detection limit was about 5-10 fmol phosphopeptide per well. A comparable signal was obtained with 320 pmol of the unphosphorylated peptide, indicating that this combination of phosphospecific antibody and substrate peptide offers excellent selectivity for the detection of the phosphorylated substrate (~ 105-fold discrimination). Saturation of the assay was reached at about 1 pmol of phosphopeptide, but the linear plot (Figure 1C) illustrates that the useful measuring range was between 0.01 pmol and 0.1 pmol. Thus, the sensitivity of the ELISA compares well with radiometric assays, where about 0.1 pmol of phosphopeptide can be routinely detected. For comparison, we analysed the same concentrations of phosphorylated and unphosphorylated tau207-219 in the inverse configuration, in which the phosphospecific antibody was used to detect the biotinylated peptide after binding to streptavidin-coated plates (Figure 1D). This assay was much less sensitive (detection limit of 1 pmol phosphorylated peptide) and suffered from crossreaction of the antibody with the unphosphorylated peptide at concentrations greater than ~ 40 pmol per well.

Next we tested whether small amounts of the phosphopeptide can be detected in mixtures with a large excess of the unphosphorylated peptide. Although the experiment shown in Figure 1B suggested that 50-100 pmol of unphosphorylated peptide should only marginally contribute to the total signal, these concentrations reduced signal intensities obtained with 10-1000 fmol phosphopeptide (Figure 1E). We decided to apply a maximum of 50 pmol total peptide per well in subsequent experiments, and to keep this amount constant in all samples of an assay (including the standards).

Measurement of DYRK1A kinase activity

We performed in vitro-kinase reactions with varying concentrations of recombinant GST-DYRK1A-ΔC to determine the minimal detectable amount of kinase activity (Figure 2). The titration revealed a useable linear measuring range between 10 and 100 μU kinase activity, corresponding to 20-200 pg of the recombinant kinase. This results is in the range that could be predicted from the detection limit of the ELISA (> 10 fmol phosphopeptide), because 10 μU of kinase should phosphorylate 300 fmol substrate within 30 min, given that a sample of 1/10 of the reaction mix was loaded per well and that the excess of unphosphorylated peptide does not severely affect detection of the phosphopeptide (Figure 1E). A similar sensitivity was achieved for GST-DYRK2, consistent with the previous finding that both DYRK1A and DYRK2 can phosphorylate Thr212 in the tau protein [23].

Figure 2
figure 2

Assay sensitivity. A, In vitro- kinase reactions were performed with 50 μM tau207-219, 100 μM ATP and variable concentrations of GST-DYRK1A-ΔC or GST-DYRK2 for 30 min at 30°C. Reactions were stopped by addition of EDTA and peptide phosphorylation was analysed by the ELISA method. Panels B and C show enlarged views of the lower kinase concentration range. Error bars indicate the difference between duplicate measurements.

Full size image

Next we tested whether this sensitivity was sufficient to detect endogenous activity of DYRK1A immunoprecipitated from mammalian tissue. We used mouse heart for this experiment, because DYRK1A has recently been identified as a negative regulator of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy [25]. The lysate was used for parallel immunoprecipitations with a DYRK1A-specific antibody and anti FLAG antibody as a negative control. After the washing steps, the resin of each sample was split and subjected in parallel to a non-radiometric and a radiometric immunocomplex kinase assay. The activity of the bound kinase was calculated from the amount of phosphate incorporation (radiometric assay) or by comparison with a standard curve (ELISA). The results in Table 1 show that the ELISA method was sufficiently sensitive to detect endogenous DYRK1A activity in mouse heart, although background levels were somewhat higher than in the radiometric assay.

Table 1 DYRK1A kinase activity in mouse heart
Full size table

Activity measurements of a DYRK1-related kinase in Xenopus laevis oocytes

DYRK kinases from distantly related organisms exhibit high sequence conservation in the catalytic domain (e.g. 85% identity between human DYRK1A and the Drosophila kinase minibrain) and are thus likely to recognize similar sequences in their substrates. Therefore, we reasoned that the ELISA assay established for mammalian DYRK1A could also be useful to measure DYRKs in other species. We decided to use Xenopus oocytes as a model system to test this assumption, because DYRK1A has been reported to play a role in oocyte maturation [14]. Database searching revealed sequences of two DYRK1 isoforms encoded by different genes (Table 2). One of these kinases shows 97% of sequence identity with human DYRK1A in the catalytic domain and can be regarded as the Xenopus ortholog of DYRK1A (xDYRK1A). The other one shows comparable sequence similarity with human DYRK1A and DYRK1B in the catalytic domain, but is much more similar to DYRK1B than DYRK1A in the C-terminal domain (see Additional file 1: Figure S1 for the complete sequence alignment). For the purpose of this report, we designate the latter kinase xDYRK1B.

Table 2 Characteristics of the two Xenopus DYRK1 isoforms
Full size table

The mRNA originally detected in Xenopus oocytes by Qu et al. [14] corresponds to xDYRK1B (see discussion). To immunoprecipitate this kinase, we took advantage of a polyclonal antiserum we had previously raised against a peptide with the sequence of the 15 C-terminal amino acids of mouse DYRK1B [26], of which 9 are identical with xDYRK1B (Figure 3A). To test whether this antiserum also recognized xDYRK1B, we overexpressed xDYRK1B in mammalian cells. As shown in Figure 3B, the antiserum was indeed suitable for immunoprecipitation and subsequent immunodetection of recombinant xDYRK1B by Western blot analysis. No band was detected in a control immunoprecipitation with serum taken from the same rabbit before immunization. The immunopurified protein contained immunodetectable phosphotyrosine, a common feature of the members of the DYRK family. Taking advantage of the fact that mammalian and Xenopus DYRK1A have identical sequences in the region corresponding to the immunogenic peptide (Figure 3A), we overexpressed GFP-DYRK1A in Hela cells to assess whether the DYRK1B antiserum might crossreact with xDYRK1A. Importantly, anti DYRK1B did not immunoprecipate GFP-DYRK1A (Figure 3C), implying that it specifically immunoprecipitates xDYRK1B and not xDYRK1A from the oocytes.

Figure 3
figure 3

Immunoprecipitation of xDYRK1B. A, C-terminal sequences of human and Xenopus DYRK1A and DYRK1B. Amino acids identical with the immunogenic peptide used to raise the DYRK1B antibody are highlighted in bold. B, Immunoprecipitation of xDYRK1B. HeLa cells were transiently transfected with expression plasmids for xDYRK1B, GFP-DYRK1B or the empty vector (control). After immunoprecipitation with DYRK1B-specific antiserum (αD1B) or preimmune serum (Pre), bound proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis with a phosphotyrosine-specific antibody (P-Tyr) and the DYRK1B antiserum as indicated. Detection of IgG is shown as a loading control. The asterisk marks an unspecific band. C, Specificity of the DYRK1B antiserum. COS7 cells were transiently transfected with expression plasmids for the GFP fusion proteins of mammalian DYRK1A or DYRK1B as indicated on top of the lanes. Aliquots of the whole cell lysates (input) or proteins eluted from the immunoprecipitates (αD1B, Pre) were subjected to Western blot analysis with anti GFP and anti DYRK1B antibodies as indicated. Detection of IgG is shown as a loading control.

Full size image

We used the DYRK1B antibody for immunocomplex kinase assays to determine whether unstimulated Xenopus oocytes contained active xDYRK1B. First we determined the phosphorylation of tau207-219 by the immunoprecipitates over time (Figure 4). Kinase activity was well detectable in the anti DYRK1B immunoprecipitates, with little background in the preimmune serum control. We decided to use an incubation time of 30 min for the following assays because the turnover was flattening after this time point. The detection of xDYRK1B activity was reproduced in three independent assays with different batches of oocytes and was also confirmed in a radiometric assay with a different substrate peptide (DYRKtide) (Table 3). In spite of this unequivocal detection of active xDYRK1B in Xenopus oocytes, we failed to detect the immunopreciptated xDYRK1B on Western blots (data not shown), apparently because the immunodetection of xDYRK1B on Western blots was less sensitive than the assay of its catalytic activity.

Figure 4
figure 4

Immunocomplex kinase assay of xDYRK1B from Xenopus laevis oocytes. Xenopus oocytes were lysed and the lysate was subjected to immunoprecipitation with either DYRK1B antiserum or preimmune serum (αD1B, Pre). Aliquots from immunocomplex kinase reactions (100 μM ATP, 50 μM tau207-219, 30°C, total volume of 50 μL) were taken at different times and the amounts of phosphorylated tau207-219 were determined by the ELISA method with the help of a standard curve. Error bars represent the difference between the duplicate measurements.

Full size image
Table 3 xDYRK1B kinase activity in Xenopus laevis oocytes
Full size table

Discussion

In the present report we describe a simple and non-radiometric assay sufficiently sensitive to measure endogenous activities of DYRKs in cell and tissue lysates. We demonstrate the usefulness of the method by measuring the activity of DYRK1A in mouse heart lysate and of a novel DYRK1B-related kinase in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

The novel assay relies on the detection of the phosphorylated substrate peptide by a phosphospecific antibody in a direct sandwich ELISA configuration. Existing phospho-ELISA procedures for in vitro- kinase assays have been designed mainly for screening application of protein kinase inhibitors, where recombinant kinases are used and sensitivity is not a major issue (e.g. [7, 8, 10, 27], as well as many commercial assays). In our ELISA configuration, we use the phospho-specific antibody as a capturing antibody. This set-up has already been utilized for the detection of phosphoproteins in cellular lysates, where the sensitive detection of a small fraction of phosphoprotein is a key issue [5]. Here we show that this configuration allows the detection of small amounts (10-100 fmol) of phosphopeptide in reaction mixtures containing a great excess of the unphosphorylated substrate. The inverse configuration of the ELISA, in which the biotinylated peptide was bound to streptavidin-coated wells, was much less sensitive with a detection limit of about 1 pmol phosphorylated peptide (Figure 1D). We have not further investigated the reason for this difference, but we speculate that the high density of the biotinylated peptide that is immobilized by the streptavidin, as compared with the few phosphorylated molecules that are captured by the phosphoantibody, impedes the binding of the detection antibody to the epitope. Further analysis of other peptide/antibody pairs will be necessary to determine whether this difference between the two configurations of the ELISA is generally valid.

Advantages of our method in comparison with other kinase assays are i) the high sensitivity ii) the possibility to use high ATP levels, iii) the avoidance of radioisotopes and iv) the simple set-up, i.e. the independence of specialized reagents (such as labelled tracers) or instruments. Apart from the plate reader, the method basically requires a high-quality phosphospecific antibody and a biotinylated substrate peptide. A drawback of ELISAs in comparison with radiometric assays is the semiquantitative nature with respect to the determination of the amount of phosphate incorporated into substrate. However, even radiometric assays of kinase activities are only rarely evaluated in a quantitative manner, because they frequently aim at the comparison of kinase activities in different samples analysed in parallel. In addition, the ELISA allows for the quantification of the DYRK activity in a given lysate by relating samples to a phosphopeptide standard. A minor limitation of the ELISA is the narrow linear range of detection, which can make it necessary to determine a suitable dilution of the reaction mixes.

We show that the present assay with tau207-219 as the substrate peptide can also be employed for measuring the activity of DYRK2, a kinase with 46% sequence identity with DYRK1A in the catalytic domain. Thr212 in tau has also been reported to be phosphorylated by other kinases such as protein kinase A (PKA) and cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5) [28, 29]. This lack of specificity precludes the use of this particular substrate for assays of a specific kinase in cell lysates, but on the other hand should allow its use for PKA and CDK5 in immunocomplex kinase assays. Obviously, the method should be applicable for other protein kinases, provided that suitable substrate peptide sequences are known and that the respective phosphoepitope-specific antibodies are available. It should be noted that the quality of the phosphospecific antibody is a critical issue, because any binding of the unphosphorylated peptide will directly affect the background and thereby limit sensitivity.

The evolutionary conservation of the DYRK family encouraged us to assess whether the ELISA could be used for measuring the activity of non-mammalian DYRKs. Given that in many species DYRKs are involved in differentiation processes [11–13, 30–33], early Xenopus development is an interesting model system to study the role of DYRKs in vertebrate embryogenesis. Here we have for the first time determined the activity of a kinase related to mammalian DYRK1B (designated xDYRK1B) in Xenopus laevis oocytes. In a previous report, an mRNA for a DYRK1-releated kinase has been identified in a microarray experiment with mRNA from Xenopus laevis oocytes and been designated "DYRK1A" [14]. However, the probe on the array was derived from a Xenopus tropicalis expressed sequence tag (TNeu006j18, GenBank acc. AL635205) that is derived from the Dyrk1a.2 gene, which is more closely related to DYRK1B (see Table 2). Surprisingly, Qu et al. [14] used a polyclonal antibody directed against the C-terminus of human DYRK1A to detect a 90-kD band in lysates of matured oocytes. These results may suggest that both xDYRK1A and xDYRK1B are expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Our attempts to immunoprecipitate xDYRK1A from the oocyte lysates remained unsuccessful (data not shown), but it is possible that the monoclonal anti human DYRK1A antibody that we used (from Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan) does not recognize xDYRK1A. Further studies will be necessary to dissect the roles of xDYRK1A and xDYRK1B in Xenopus development.

Conclusion

The use of a phosphospecific capture antibody in ELISA-based kinase assays allows for the sensitive measurement of endogenous DYRK activity in diverse biological samples. With the help of this method, kinase activity of DYRK1B was detected in Xenopus laevis oocytes. We expect that this assay should prove useful for the study of kinase functions in various model systems.

Methods

Peptides and antibodies

A biotinylated substrate peptide mimicking the sequence around Thr212 of the tau protein (Biotin-Ttds-GSRSRT PSLPTPP-NH2, Thr212 is underlined, where Ttds is a proprietary linker) was selected from the Single Kinase Substrate Peptides commercially available from JPT Peptide Technologies (Berlin, Germany). For use in standard curves, a phosphorylated version was custom synthesized by Eurogentec (Seraing, Belgium). The optimized substrate peptide DYRKtide and the rabbit antibody directed against the C-terminus of human DYRK1B have been described previously [26, 34]. The following antibodies were obtained from commercial sources: rabbit anti TAU(pT212) antibody (Cat. No. 44-740G; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), mouse monoclonal antibodies for phosphotyrosine (PY99, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), FLAG epitope (FLAG-M2, Sigma, Munich, Germany) and DYRK1A (clone 7D10; Abnova, Taipei City, Taiwan), and goat GFP-specific antibody (Rockland, Gilbertsville, PA).

Preparation of mouse heart and Xenopus oocyte lysates

Hearts from TW-104 mice were weighed and 2 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 15% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 μg/ml aprotinin, 10 μg/mL pepstatin, 10 μg/mL leupeptin, 1 μL PMSF) were added per 400 mg of tissue. The hearts were cut into small pieces, subjected to 10 strokes of medium rpm (stage 6 out of 10) in a Potter Elvehjem homogenizer, and the homogenates were then sonified for 20 s. After centrifugation (21,000 g, 4°C, 10 minutes), the supernatant was taken and stored at -80°C. The lysates were cleared by pre-incubation for 30 minutes with 30 μL protein G agarose (EZview™ Red Protein G Affinity Gel, Sigma, Munich, Germany) and subsequent centrifugation before the supernatant was taken for immunoprecipitations. Follicle cell-free oocytes of oogenesis stages V or VI from Xenopus laevis [35] were kindly provided by the members of the Schmalzing group in the Institute of Pharmacology. The oocytes were lysed in 4 volumes of lysis buffer by up-and-down pipetting, and the lysates were cleared by repeated centrifugation to remove lipids and insoluble debris.

Immunoprecipitation

For the immunoprecipitation from heart lysates, 1 μg monoclonal anti DYRK1A or 1 μg anti-FLAG antibody were added to a volume of lysate containing 1 mg of total protein. For the oocyte experiments, the amount of lysate derived from a volume of 100 μl settled oocytes was used for immunoprecipitation with either 1 μg anti DYRK1A antibody, 1 μl anti DYRK1B serum [26] or 1 μl non-reacting serum (preimmune serum of the same rabbit used to raise the DYRK1B-specific serum).

Immuncomplexes were captured by over-night incubation with protein G agarose at 4°C in an end-over-end rotator. After washing the agarose beads twice with TBS (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA) supplemented with 0.1% Igepal CA-630, twice with TBS without Igepal and once with kinase buffer, bound immunocomplexes were assayed for in vitro-kinase activity (see below). In some experiments, the affinity matrix was divided equally between two test tubes during the last washing step to allow for the direct comparison of radioactive and non-radioactive assay.

Cell culture and transfection

HeLa cells were cultured in Quantum 101 Medium for HeLa cells (PAA Laboratories, Pasching, Austria) and COS7 cells in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (PAA) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Transient transfections were performed using the FuGENE HD transfection reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany). Expression clones for GFP-DYRK1A and GFP-DYRK1B (p69 splicing variant) have been described previously [26, 36]. An expression clone for untagged full length xDYRK1B (IMAGE clone 4724858) was obtained from Imagenes (Berlin, Germany).

Western blotting

After washing the immunoprecipitates with TBS, bound proteins were eluted with Laemmli sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE (7%) and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. Immunodetection with commercial antibodies was performed according to the supplier's instructions. The DYRK1B antiserum was used at a dilution of 1:5000 for 2 h at room temperature, and the TBS for the washes following incubation with the primary antibody was supplemented with 0.1% SDS to reduce non-specific binding [26]. Western blots were developed using horseradish peroxidase-coupled secondary antibodies and chemiluminescence detection. The Clean-Blot IP Detection Reagent (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) was used as a secondary antibody when proteins were immunodetected with the same antibody used for immunoprecipitation.

Kinase assays

Recombinant glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins of rat DYRK1A-ΔC and human DYRK2 were prepared as described previously [34, 36]. One unit of kinase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzed the phosphorylation of 1 nmol DYRKtide per min at 30°C in kinase buffer (25 mM Hepes, pH 7.0, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol).

To determine the assay sensitivity (Figure 2), reactions were performed in a total volume of 10 μl with variable amounts of the recombinant kinase, 50 μM tau207-219 and 100 μM ATP at 30°C for 30 min. Reactions were stopped by addition of 10 μl 10 mM EDTA and stored at -20°C until analysis by ELISA.

To prepare phosphorylated tau207-219 for the use in the ELISA (Figure 1), we aimed to achieve maximal phosphorylation by incubating 2.5 nmol tau207-219 with an excess of active kinase (4 mU/μL GST-DYRK1A-ΔC) in the presence of 0.82 mM ATP. The reaction mixture was incubated for 2 hours, and the same amount of kinase was supplemented after one hour. Total incorporation of phosphate was determined in a parallel reaction that was incubated in the presence of [γ-33P]ATP under identical conditions. All other kinase assays were incubated for 30 min at 30°C.

Immunocomplex kinase assays were carried out in a total reaction volume of 50 μl in kinase buffer, 100 μM ATP and 50 μM tau207-219 at 30°C for 30 min and stopped by addition of 50 μL 10 mM EDTA. Samples were stored at -20°C until evaluation by ELISA. Radiometric assays were run in the presence of [γ-33P]ATP (~ 2000 cpm/pmol). Incorporation of 33P into the biotinylated tau peptide was determined by spotting aliquots of the reaction mix onto a streptavidin membrane (SAM2 Biotin Capture Membrane, Promega, Mannheim, Germany), which was then washed as described by the manufacturer and evaluated by scintillation counting. Radiometric immunocomplex kinase assays with the substrate peptide DYRKtide (at 100 μM) were run with 10 μM ATP as described before [37].

Direct Sandwich ELISA

MaxiSorp F96 MicroWell™ Plates (Nunc, Langenselbold, Germany) were coated with 100 ng/well TAU(pT212) antibody at 4°C overnight. To keep the antibody consumption low, we used 100 ng/well of capturing antibody for coating in the standard protocol, although 200 ng/well gave a slightly higher readout (1.2-fold). After blocking for 1 hour with 200 μl/well 2% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (fraction V, modified Cohn, Calbiochem) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (140 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4), the antigen was added in a volume of 100 μL/well and the plates were incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Bound antigen was detected with streptavidin-HRP conjugate (Pierce, Rockford, IL; 100 μL/well, 2 h at room temperature; 25 ng/ml) and subsequent incubation with 100 μL/well TMB (3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine) substrate solution until colour development was observed. Other detection reagents (HRP-linked anti-biotin antibody from CST; strepavidin-HRP from R&D systems) were less sensitive, and higher concentration of the streptavidin-HRP conjugate resulted in higher background in empty wells. The reaction was then stopped by adding 50 μl/well 1 M HCl, and plates were read at 450 nm (reference wavelength 620 nm). After each incubation step, plates were washed 4 times with PBS, pH 7.4, 0.1% Tween-20. Antibody and antigen were diluted in PBS.

ELISA format based on streptavidin-coated plates

Reacti-Bind™ Streptavidin High Binding Capacity Coated 96-Well Plates (Pierce; Rockford, IL, USA) were loaded with the indicated concentrations of the biotinylated peptides (100 μL/well) and incubated at RT for 2 h. After washing, bound phosphopeptide was detected with rabbit anti TAU(pT212) antibody (1:16.000) and HRP-linked goat anti rabbit IgG (Fc) (Pierce) (1:40.000) and TMB substrate as described above. PBS with 2% BSA and 0.1% Tween-20 was used for plate washing and for dilution of antigen and antibodies.

Data evaluation and curve fitting

Standard curves of phosphorylated tau peptide and the graphical representation of the time course shown in Figure 4 were generated by non-linear curve fitting using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

References

  1. Ishida A, Kameshita I, Sueyoshi N, Takanobu T, Taniguchi T, Shigeri Y: Recent advances in technologies for analyzing protein kinases. J Pharmacol Sci. 2007, 103: 5-11. 10.1254/jphs.CP0060026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jia Y, Quinn CM, Kwak S, Talanian RV: Current in vitro kinase assays; the quest for a universal format. Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2008, 5: 59-69. 10.2174/157016308783769414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Witt JJ, Roskoski R: Rapid protein kinase assay using phosphocellulose-paper absorption. Anal Biochem. 1975, 66: 253-258. 10.1016/0003-2697(75)90743-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Glass DB, Masaracchia RA, Feramisco JR, Kemp BE: Isolation of phosphorylated peptides and proteins on ion exchange papers. Anal Biochem. 1978, 87: 566-575. 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90707-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Olive DM: Quantitative methods for the analysis of protein phosphorylation in drug development. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2004, 1: 327-341. 10.1586/14789450.1.3.327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yano T, Taura C, Shibata M, Hirono Y, Ando S, Kusubata M, Takahashi T, Inagaki M: A monoclonal antibody to the phosphorylated form of glial fibrillary acidic protein: application to a non-radioactive method for measuring protein kinase activities. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991, 175: 1144-1151. 10.1016/0006-291X(91)91685-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Farley K, Mett H, McGlynn E, Murray B, Lydon NB: Development of solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the determination of epidermal growth factor receptor and pp60c-src tyrosine protein kinase activity. Anal Biochem. 1992, 203: 151-157. 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90056-D.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu JS, Chang SH, Chan WH, Chen HC: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of p21-activated kinase activity. J Biochem. 2001, 29: 243-251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehel C, Daniel-Issakani S, Brasseur M, Strulovici B: A chemiluminescent microtiter plate assay for sensitive detection of protein kinase activity. Anal Biochem. 1997, 244: 340-346. 10.1006/abio.1996.9894.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ross H, Armstrong CG, Cohen P: A non-radioactive method for the assay of many serine/threonine-specific protein kinases. Biochem J. 2002, 366: 977-981.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin SG, Berthelot-Grosjean M: Polar gradients of the DYRK-family kinase Pom1 couple cell length with the cell cycle. Nature. 2009, 459: 852-856. 10.1038/nature08054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moseley JB, Mayeux A, Paoletti A, Nurse P: A spatial gradient coordinates cell size and mitotic entry in fission yeast. Nature. 2009, 459: 857-860. 10.1038/nature08074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stitzel ML, Pellettieri J, Seydoux G: The C. elegans DYRK Kinase MBK-2 Marks Oocyte Proteins for Degradation in Response to Meiotic Maturation. Curr Biol. 2006, 16: 56-62. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Qu Y, Adler V, Chu T, Platica O, Michl J, Pestka S, Izotova L, Boutjdir M, Pincus MR: Two dual specificity kinases are preferentially induced by wild-type rather than by oncogenic RAS-P21 in Xenopus oocytes. Front Biosci. 2006, 11: 2420-2427. 10.2741/1979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tejedor F, Zhu XR, Kaltenbach E, Ackermann A, Baumann A, Canal I, Heisenberg M, Fischbach KF, Pongs O: minibrain: a new protein kinase family involved in postembryonic neurogenesis in Drosophila. Neuron. 1995, 14: 287-301. 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90286-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hämmerle B, Elizalde C, Galceran J, Becker W, Tejedor FJ: The MNB/DYRK1A protein kinase: neurobiological functions and Down syndrome implications. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2003, 67: 129-137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dierssen M, de Lagrán MM: DYRK1A (dual-specificity tyrosine-phosphorylated and -regulated kinase 1A): a gene with dosage effect during development and neurogenesis. ScientificWorldJournal. 2006, 6: 1911-1922. 10.1100/tsw.2006.319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Becker W: DYRK1A. UCSD-Nature Molecule Pages. 2008

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshida K: Role for DYRK family kinases on regulation of apoptosis. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008, 76: 1389-1394. 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.05.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Friedman E: Mirk/Dyrk1B in cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2007, 102: 274-279. 10.1002/jcb.21451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de la Luna S, Estivill X: Cooperation to amplify gene-dosage-imbalance effects. Trends Mol Med. 2006, 12: 451-454. 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.08.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Park J, Song WJ, Chung KC: Function and regulation of Dyrk1A: towards understanding Down syndrome. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009, 66: 3235-3240. 10.1007/s00018-009-0123-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Woods YL, Cohen P, Becker W, Jakes R, Goedert M, Wang X, Proud CG: The kinase DYRK phosphorylates protein-synthesis initiation factor eIF2Bepsilon at Ser539 and the microtubule-associated protein tau at Thr212: potential role for DYRK as a glycogen synthase kinase 3-priming kinase. Biochem J. 2001, 355: 609-615.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ryoo SR, Jeong HK, Radnaabazar C, Yoo JJ, Cho HJ, Lee HW, Kim IS, Cheon YH, Ahn YS, Chung SH, Song WJ: DYRK1A-mediated hyperphosphorylation of Tau. A functional link between Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 34850-34857. 10.1074/jbc.M707358200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuhn C, Frank D, Will R, Jaschinski C, Frauen R, Katus HA, Frey N: DYRK1A is a novel negative regulator of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 17320-17327. 10.1074/jbc.M109.006759.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Leder S, Czajkowska H, Maenz B, De Graaf K, Barthel A, Joost HG, Becker W: Alternative splicing variants of dual specificity tyrosine phosphorylated and regulated kinase 1B exhibit distinct patterns of expression and functional properties. Biochem J. 2003, 372: 881-888. 10.1042/BJ20030182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Forrer P, Tamaskovic R, Jaussi R: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for measurement of JNK, ERK, and p38 kinase activities. Biol Chem. 1998, 379: 1101-1111. 10.1515/bchm.1998.379.8-9.1101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kinoshita-Kikuta E, Aoki Y, Kinoshita E, Koike T: Label-free kinase profiling using phosphate affinity polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007, 6: 356-366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Illenberger S, Zheng-Fischhöfer Q, Preuss U, Stamer K, Baumann K, Trinczek B, Biernat J, Godemann R, Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E: The endogenous and cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of tau protein in living cells: implications for Alzheimer's disease. Mol Biol Cell. 1998, 9: 1495-1512.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hämmerle B, Vera-Samper E, Speicher S, Arencibia R, Martínez S, Tejedor FJ: Mnb/Dyrk1A is transiently expressed and asymmetrically segregated in neural progenitor cells at the transition to neurogenic divisions. Dev Biol. 2002, 246: 259-273. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0675.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nissen RM, Amsterdam A, Hopkins N: A zebrafish screen for craniofacial mutants identifies wdr68 as a highly conserved gene required for endothelin-1 expression. BMC Dev Biol. 2006, 6: 28-10.1186/1471-213X-6-28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Goyard S, Knechtle P, Chauvel M, Mallet A, Prévost MC, Proux C, Coppée JY, Schwartz P, Dromer F, Park H, Filler SG, Janbon G, d'Enfert C: The Yak1 kinase is involved in the initiation and maintenance of hyphal growth in Candida albicans. Mol Biol Cell. 2008, 19: 2251-2266. 10.1091/mbc.E07-09-0960.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Canzonetta C, Mulligan C, Deutsch S, Ruf S, O'Doherty A, Lyle R, Borel C, Lin-Marq N, Delom F, Groet J, Schnappauf F, De Vita S, Averill S, Priestley JV, Martin JE, Shipley J, Denyer G, Epstein CJ, Fillat C, Estivill X, Tybulewicz VL, Fisher EM, Antonarakis SE, Nizetic D: DYRK1A-dosage imbalance perturbs NRSF/REST levels, deregulating pluripotency and embryonic stem cell fate in Down syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2008, 83: 388-400. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.08.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Himpel S, Tegge W, Frank R, Leder S, Joost HG, Becker W: Specificity determinants of substrate recognition by the protein kinase DYRK1A. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 2431-2438. 10.1074/jbc.275.4.2431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schmalzing G, Gloor S, Omay H, Kröner S, Appelhans H, Schwarz W: Up-regulation of sodium pump activity in Xenopus laevis oocytes by expression of heterologous beta 1 subunits of the sodium pump. Biochem J. 1991, 279: 329-336.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Becker W, Weber Y, Wetzel K, Eirmbter K, Tejedor FJ, Joost HG: Sequence characteristics, subcellular localization, and substrate specificity of DYRK-related kinases, a novel family of dual specificity protein kinases. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 25893-25902. 10.1074/jbc.273.40.25893.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Göckler N, Jofre G, Papadopoulos C, Soppa U, Tejedor FJ, Becker W: Harmine specifically inhibits protein kinase DYRK1A and interferes with neurite formation. FEBS J. 2009, 276: 6324-6337. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07346.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the members of the Schmalzing group for the gift of the Xenopus oocytes and to Ulf Soppa for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Be 1967/2-2 and Be 1967/3-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty of the RWTH Aachen University, Wendlingweg 2, 52074, Aachen, Germany

    Eva Lilienthal, Katharina Kolanowski & Walter Becker

Authors
  1. Eva Lilienthal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katharina Kolanowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Walter Becker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Becker.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

EL designed and carried out most of the experiments and analysed the results. KK carried out the experiments with Xenopus DYRK1. WB conceived of and coordinated the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

12858_2009_281_MOESM1_ESM.PDF

Additional file 1: Figure S1. This PDF file contains a supplementary figure that shows a multiple sequence alignment of human and Xenopus laevis DYRK1 isoforms. (PDF 7 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lilienthal, E., Kolanowski, K. & Becker, W. Development of a sensitive non-radioactive protein kinase assay and its application for detecting DYRK activity in Xenopus laevis oocytes. BMC Biochem 11, 20 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-11-20

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-11-20

Keywords

  • Xenopus Oocyte
  • Substrate Peptide
  • Kinase Assay
  • Xenopus Laevis Oocyte
  • Phosphospecific Antibody

BMC Biochemistry

ISSN: 1471-2091

Contact us