Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Biochemistry

Open Access

Blocking binding of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Aa to Bombyx mori cadherin receptor results in only a minor reduction of toxicity

  • Taek H You2,
  • Mi K Lee3,
  • Jeremy L Jenkins4,
  • Oscar Alzate5 and
  • Donald H Dean1Email author
BMC Biochemistry20089:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2091-9-3

Received: 14 March 2007

Accepted: 24 January 2008

Published: 24 January 2008

Abstract

Background

Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Aa insecticidal protein is the most active known B. thuringiensis toxin against the forest insect pest Lymantria dispar (gypsy moth), unfortunately it is also highly toxic against the non-target insect Bombyx mori (silk worm).

Results

Surface exposed hydrophobic residues over domains II and III were targeted for site-directed mutagenesis. Substitution of a phenylalanine residue (F328) by alanine reduced binding to the Bombyx mori cadherin by 23-fold, reduced biological activity against B. mori by 4-fold, while retaining activity against Lymantria dispar.

Conclusion

The results identify a novel receptor-binding epitope and demonstrate that virtual elimination of binding to cadherin BR-175 does not completely remove toxicity in the case of B. mori.

Background

In the final chapter of her landmark book, Silent Spring, Rachael Carson recommended Bacillus thuringiensis as a biological pesticide with less environmental impact than conventional chemical pesticides [1]. For 30 years B. thuringiensis formulations have been sprayed as topical pesticides with annual world-wide applications estimated at 2.3 × 106 kg [2], providing a massive experiment on its ecological and health impact. The results have demonstrated the general safety of B. thuringiensis for the environment and humans. The latest application method is the genetic engineering of plants to systemically express B. thuringiensis insecticidal proteins. This step increases specificity and generally has reduced sprayed pesticide impact on the environment in the United States and Canada.

The report of the sensitivity of monarch butterfly (Daneaus plexippus) to pollen of genetically modified corn [3], albeit controversial [4], and unlikely to be a threat to insects in the field [58] reemphasizes what has been known for almost 100 years [9], B. thuringiensis, despite a generally narrow host range [10], can affect certain non-target insects [11]; and the silkworm, Bombyx mori is a prime example [12, 13].

Previous studies have indicated that surface exposed charged and hydrophobic residues in domains II loop regions of several Cry toxins are involved in receptor binding (irreversible and reversible) [1418]. This prompted us to investigate the implications that hydrophobic residues in other areas on the surface of domain II may affect toxicity and binding. Cry1Aa was chosen because of its known structure [19]; and its high activity to both B. mori and the forest pest L. dispar. Phenylalanines at position 313, 328, 333, 335, and 461 were selected and tested for biological activity against B. mori, and L. dispar. Binding to brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV) and purified receptors of those insects were investigated.

Methods

Mutant construction

To construct Cry1Aa mutants, Bacillus thuringiensis cry1Aa1 gene (NCBI accession M11250) from pOS4101 [20], originally from pES1 [21] was subcloned into plasmid pBluescript SK(-) to generate pBN-1Aa. To accommodate the NdeI fragment containing cry1Aa coding region, EcoRV recognition sequence in the multiple cloning site of the vector was modified to NdeI recognition sequence by site-directed mutagenesis.

The Cry1Aa mutant toxins were constructed using single strand DNA of the wild type Cry1Aa as template. Mutagenic oligonucleotide DNA primers were synthesized from GeneMed Synthesis, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA). Single strand DNA template was prepared using Bio-Rad Mutagene mutagenesis kit and site-directed mutagenesis was performed according to manufacturer's instruction.

DNA sequencing reactions were performed in the PTC-150 Minicycler (MJ Research, Inc., MA) using the Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems DNA sequencing kit following manufacturer's instruction. The sequencing results were analyzed by ABI 373A DNA sequencer.

Protein purification

The crystal inclusion bodies of the Cry1Aa and its mutant toxins were expressed and purified from E. coli MV1190 containing pBN-1Aa as described [22]. The purified crystal proteins were solubilized in 50 mM Na2CO3 containing 10 mM DTT, pH 9.6 at 37°C with shaking at 220 rpm for 5 h. The solubilized protoxin was digested with 2% (w/w) trypsin (Sigma) at 37°C for 3 h, at a trypsin/protoxin ratio of 1:20 by mass. When obvious incomplete digestion was observed after visualizing on SDS-10 % polyacrylamide gels, the protoxins were further digested with an additional dose of 1 % (w/w) trypsin for 2 h. Toxins were further purified as the monomeric fraction on a Hiload 16/60 Superdex 200 Prep Grade column (GE Healthcare) in either HBS (HEPES-buffered saline, 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 3.4 mM EDTA) for Biacore analysis, or 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 with an Äkta Explorer FPLC (GE Healthcare). To ensure toxin existed as a monomer in solution, dynamic light scattering for molecular size detection was employed using a DynaPro 801 (Protein Solutions, Inc.). Concentration of protoxins and toxins was estimated by Coomassie Protein Assay Reagent (Pierce) and the purity was examined on the SDS-10 % PAGE [23].

Toxicity bioassays

L. dispar eggs were kindly provided by Gary Bernon (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Otis Methods Development Center, Beltsville, MD). Eggs were hatched and reared on artificial diet (Bio-Serv, Frenchtown, NJ). B. mori eggs were kindly provided by Ross Milne (Canadian Forestry Service, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada). Eggs were hatched and reared on mulberry (Morus albus) leaves from trees received from the Canadian Forestry Service, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada) and grown in the College of Biological Sciences Entomology Greenhouse. Insects were reared at ambient temperature and humidity. Activities of toxins were determined with 2–3 day old L. dispar and B. mori larvae by the surface contamination method as described [24] and [20], respectively, using trypsin activated, column purified monomeric toxin. Toxins were diluted in 50 mM sodium carbonate buffer (pH 9.5), and 50 μg samples were applied per well (2 cm2) on artificial diet in 24-well tissue culture plates. Two larvae were placed in each well and the mortality was recorded after 5 days. Bioassays were repeated at least 4 times. The effective dose estimates (LC50, 50% lethal concentration of toxin) were calculated using PROBIT analysis [25].

BBMV binding assays

Mutant toxins were tested for binding to brush border membrane vesicle (BBMV) of B. mori. The BBMVs were prepared from midguts of the last instar larvae of B. mori, by the magnesium precipitation method as described [26]. Twenty μg of toxin was iodinated with 1 mCi of Na125I (Amersham) in 50 mM sodium carbonate buffer (pH 9.5) in the presence of one IODO-BEAD (Pierce). Incubation was for 15 min at room temperature. Labeled toxins were separated from the unlabeled free iodine using the Excellulose GF-5 column (Pierce). The specific activity of the labeled Cry1Aa was 0.75 μCi/μg protein. Heterologous competition binding assays were performed as described previously [22]. Ten μg of BBMV (amounts of BBMV refers to BBMV protein throughout) was incubated with 2 nM of 125I-labeled toxins in 100 μl of 8 mM NaHPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4, containing 0.1 % BSA, for 1 h at room temperature in the presence of increasing amounts of corresponding unlabeled competitors (from 0 to 500 nM). The bound toxins were separated from unbound toxins by centrifugation at 15,500 rpm (22,000 × g) for 10 min. The pellet containing the bound toxins was washed twice with binding buffer, and the radioactivity in the resulting pellet was counted in a gamma counter (Beckman).

Receptor purification

Purified B. mori aminopeptidase N and cadherin-like protein were obtained from B. mori midguts that were dissected from 4th or 5th instar larvae. BBMV were prepared by the general method of Wolfersberger [27] as described [22]. B. mori BBMV (10 mg in 10 ml) was solubilized in 5 mg/ml CHAPS zwitterionic detergent (Roche) overnight at 4°C with gentle rocking. Solubilized BBMV was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min and supernatant was concentrated to 2 ml by Amicon YM30 ultrafiltration. The sample was loaded on a Q Sepharose HR 10/30 anion-exchange column with an ÄKTA Explorer (GE Healthcare) after column activation. A salt gradient (0–1 M NaCl was used to elute BBMV proteins. The low salt buffer (buffer A) consisted of 20 mM Tris, 5 mM MgCl, 0.4 mg/ml CHAPS, pH 8.6, and the high salt buffer used was buffer A + 1 M NaCl. All fractions were tested for APN activity by the LpNA assay. Briefly, 390 μl of sample are mixed with 10 μl of 2 mM leucine-p-nitroanalide (containing a leucine-phenylalanine dipeptide). A yellow chromophoric change indicates aminopeptidase N activity, defined as the ability to cleave a neutral amino acid from the N-terminus of a polypeptide. Cry1Aa binding ability was also checked by slot blotting fractions to PVDF membrane and probing with biotinylated Cry1Aa [28]. Biotinylation was done with a Biotin Labeling Kit (Roche). Fractions with Cry1Aa-binding ability and APN activity were concentrated and loaded on a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 Prep Grade column (GE Healthcare) (120 ml bed volume). Fractions eluting around 120 kDa, the MW of APN, were collected, concentrated by Amicon (Millipore) ultrafiltration on YM30 membranes, and protease inhibitor was added before freezing. Several kinds of APNs occur in the midgut of B. mori [29]. Our preparation may contain more than one of these. Anion-exchange fractions with Cry1Aa-binding ability but without APN activity were also size-purifed, and fractions eluting around 175–250 kDa, the MW of BtR175, were collected and stored. Additionally, the purified fractions were loaded on a 6% SDS-PAGE gel, then transferred overnight at 40 V to PVDF. The membrane was probed with biotin-Cry1Aa and biotin-Cry1Aa F328A. Cry1Aa bound to a single band at 120 kDa in the APN fraction and a single band at 201 kDa in the cadherin fraction. Cry1Aa F328A bound only to a single 120 kDa band in the APN fraction but bound no observable bands in the cadherin fraction.

Surface plasmon resonance with purified midgut receptors

B. mori APN and B. mori cadherin were immobilized (100–200 ng for each) on three flowcells of a single CM5 sensor chip by the amine-coupling method (Biacore AB). Receptors were diluted into ammonium acetate, pH 4.2 prior to immobilization. An HBS (pH 7.4) buffer (discribed above under Protein Purification) flow rate of 50 μl/min was used for all injections. Randomized toxin concentrations varying from 100 nM to 1000 nM were injected (110 μl) over the receptor surfaces. Surfaces were regenerated with 6 μl pulses of 10 mM NaOH, 250 μM ethylene glycol, pH 11.0 at 100 μl/min. Flowcell 4 (blank) responses were subtracted from all response curves and data were fitted using BIAevaluation 3.0. The curves were fit to a simple 1:1 Langmuir binding model to obtain apparent rate constants (A + B ↔ AB).

Results and discussion

To investigate the role of surface hydrophobic residues on receptor binding, the mutant proteins, F313A, F328A, and F461A; and, the double mutant protein, F333A-F335A, were expressed at similar levels to that of wild type Cry1Aa (35–50% total cell protein [20]) and produced stable toxin peptides by trypsin activation. Stability refers here to the trypsin resistant state of the 65 kDa toxin. Another alanine mutant toxin, F338A, was expressed at a low level or was degraded during trypsin activation (no further studies were conducted with this mutant). The positions of these residues on the surface of the Cry1Aa toxin structure are shown (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Structure of Cry1Aa insecticidal protein showing surface phenylalanine residues (red) which were changed to alanine. A, ribbon diagram model to illustrate the secondary structure of domains I (alpha helical), II (beta strands) and III (beta sandwich). B, space filling model, to illustrate the surface exposure of the phenylalanine residues (red). Molecular models were generated using QUANTA (Molecular Simulations, Inc.)

Toxicity of wild type Cry1Aa and mutant toxins against L. dispar, and B. mori larvae are given in Table 1 as LC50 values of each toxin. Against L. dispar, none of the mutant proteins show significant differences in toxicity. To B. mori, mutant toxin F328A displayed four-fold reduced toxicity, while F313A, the double mutant F333A-F335A, and F461A displayed overlapping confidence limits with the wild type Cry1Aa toxin.
Table 1

Biological activities of Cry1Aa and mutant toxins to L. dispar, and B. mori. Toxicity is measured as LC50 in ng/ccm.

Toxin

LC50 against L. dispar

LC50 against B. mori

Cry1Aa (Wt)

1.59 (0.76–2.64)

10.45 (7.14–14.12)

F313A

1.68 (0.86–2.72)

17.34 (11.70–21.74)

F328A

1.80 (0.98–2.80)

41.52 (24.69–66.76)

FF333,335AA

2.18 (1.30–3.26)

15.47 (8.8–25.5)

F461A

1.73 (1.18–2.46)

17.1 (12.7–22.7)

To investigate the mechanism by which mutant protein F328A reduces toxicity to B. mori, we examined toxin-binding properties to BBMV. BBMV competition binding assays of wild type Cry1Aa and mutant toxins demonstrated that F328A exhibited little competition with the wild type toxin until the highest amounts of competing toxins. This reduced affinity is consistent with its reduced toxicity. Mutant proteins F313A, F461A, and the double mutant, F333A-F335A, toxins displayed slightly decreased binding affinity compared to the wild type Cry1Aa (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

Competition with labeled Cry1Aa and mutant toxins to B. mori brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV) (bars represent error of n = 4). Cry1Aa wild type protein, (-); F313A mutant protein, (-); F333A-F335A, mutant protein (-); F461A mutant protein, (-); and, F328A mutant protein, (▲-▲). % uncompeted toxin indicates the % of labeled toxin remaining bound to BBMV in the presence of unlabeled cold toxin competitor.

We further examined binding properties of these mutant proteins to the purified known B. mori Cry1Aa binding proteins from the B. mori midgut. Previous studies demonstrated the purification of Cry1Aa binding proteins (receptors), aminopeptidase N (APN) and cadherin-like receptor, from B. mori [12, 13]. We have previously examined binding of Cry1Aa, Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac and hybrid domain-substitution mutants involving Cry1Aa and Cry1Ac by the surface plasmon resonance with purified B. mori binding proteins [30]. We found that Cry1Aa binds to B. mori cadherin-like proteins with a Kd of 2.6 nM and to B. mori APN with a Kd of 75 nM. Binding of Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac was negligible to either one of these binding proteins. Domain substitutions indicated that domain III from Cry1Ac did not affect binding, indicating that either the binding epitopes of domain III from Cry1Aa and Cry1Ac are the same or that they play little role in binding the cadherin-like proteins.

In this study, we purified both of these binding proteins from B. mori midgut tissue and analyzed binding properties of wild type and mutant proteins using surface plasmon resonance on a BIAcore 2000 (Fig. 3). The wild type Cry1Aa binding to cadherin-like receptor was ka = 1.3 × 104 M-1s-1 (+/- 6.1 × 103), kd = 3.3 × 10-5 s -1 (+/- 1x10-5), KD= 2.6 nM; and to B. mori APN were 2.1 × 104 M-1s-1 (+/- 1.3 × 102), kd = 1.5 × 10-3s-1 (+/- 1 × 10-5), KD = 75 nM. Mutant protein F328A showed significantly lower binding to cadherin-like receptor but bound slightly less (2-fold lower) to APN than wild type. Its binding to B. mori APN was 1.8 × 104 M-1s-1 (+/- 2.9 × 102), kd = 2.3 × 10-3 s-1, and KD = 132 mM; while to B. mori cadherin, the F328A mutant toxin yielded apparent rate constant values to cadnerin: ka = 1.5 × 10 3 M-1s-1 (+/- 9.0 × 10 3), kd = 9.1 × 10-5 s-1 (+/- 8 × 10-9), KD = 60.7 nM, a 23-fold lower binding affinity than wild type Cry1Aa. This receptor binding data suggested that the phenylalanine residue at 328 might play an important role in binding to the cadherin-like receptor, which led to the reduction in toxicity. Other mutant toxins, F313A, F333A-F335A, and F461A did not show any changes in binding to either APN or cadherin-like receptor(data not shown).
Figure 3

Binding of Cry1Aa and the mutant toxin F328A to the APN and cadherin-like protein purified from B. mori measured by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) using a Biacore 1000. Representative BIAcore response curves for toxin injections at 200 (lower curve), 300 (second curve from bottom), 500 (third curve from bottom), and 1000 nM (top curve). Experimental curves (grey) are shown overlaid with fitted curves (black) obtained with the 1:1 Langmuir binding model. The same APN-bound chip is used in figures A and B, and the cadherin-bound chip is used in figures C and D. (A) Cry1Aa wt binding to B. mori APN. (B) F328A binding to B. mori APN. (C) Cry1Aa wt binding to B. mori cadherin-like protein. (D) F328A binding to B. mori cadherin-like protein.

The cadherin-like protein has been reported to be a functional Cry1Ab receptor [3134], while APN was reported as a functional receptor for Cry1Ac [3537] and Cry1C [38]. More recently an additional receptor, BR-270, has been reported as an anionic brush border membrane glycoconjugate that show tight binding to a number of Cry toxins [39]. The role of this receptor in the overall mechanism of action of Cry toxins is unknown and its response to mutant toxins is unreported. It is possible that only one of these is a functional receptor, leading to lethality, while the others serve as non-functional toxin-binding molecules. Or, perhaps a more complicated, multifaceted mechanism is involved, as proposed recently [40].

One unexpected finding in these experiments was that F461A, F313A and F333A-F335A mutant toxins did not change the binding properties to either APN or cadherin-like proteins (not shown), although these mutant proteins did affect overall binding to BBMV. This may be due to the possibility that these mutations might affect binding to a binding protein other than APN and the cadherin-like protein. Taking into account the fact that F313 is located on a different face from F333 and F335 as indicated in the Fig 1, it is suggested that these phenylalanine residues might be involved in binding to different receptors or different binding steps.

After the work on this paper was completed we became aware of a paper [41] reporting a B. thuringiensis strain, AF101, which exhibited lower activity toward B. mori. The authors reported that an altered Cry1Ab toxin, responsible for the lower activity, differed in three residues and the carboxy-terminal portion from wild type Cry1Ab. The three residues were S261A (a partially buried residue), S560N and F328L, the critical residue found in our work with the different Bt toxin, Cry1Aa. Since Cry1Ab does not bind significantly to APN or cadherin [30], one might speculate that F328 may also interact with other receptors.

Our observation that mutation in F328 to A affected binding to B. mori cadherin but not to L. dispar cadherin indicates that different toxin-receptor interactions take place in different insects. This principle was noted earlier in comparing the action of mutants of Cry1Ab and their action on Manduca sexta and Heliothis virescens [24].

Our understanding of certain aspects of the function of the B. thuringiensis insecticidal proteins, especially in the area of receptor binding has also been enhanced by protein engineering techniques [10, 4244]. Briefly, the previously described receptor-binding epitopes, best understood in Cry1Ac, are in the loops at the bottom of domain II, and N-acetylgalactosamine binding pocket in domain III [4345].

Protein engineering techniques have allowed improvements of proteins as well as understanding of their function [46]. Improvements in toxicity against target pests, as much as 36-fold, have been reported for B. thuringiensis toxins [4749]. In the present paper we demonstrate the proof of principle that site-specific mutagenesis can render these biopesticides more specific by reducing activity to a non-target insect.

Conclusion

In the present paper, we have observed a new receptor-binding epitope around residue 328 in domain II, between the previously observed epitopes. Mutations in this region specifically reduced toxicity 4-fold to B. mori by blocking binding to B. mori cadherin, BTR175, whereas binding to B. mori APN was unaffected. The results demonstrate that virtual elimination of binding to cadherin BR-175 does not completely remove toxicity in the case of B. mori.

Through a combination of learning more about the mechanism of action of these biopesticides, rational application of protein engineering techniques and serendipity, better insecticidal proteins can be developed that have improved activity against target pests and reduced activity against certain non-target insects. The overall aim in this effort is to protect agricultural crops and reduce non-specific pesticides to achieve increased food production while protecting the environment.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes for Health R01 AI 29092 to D.H.D. We thank Ross Milne for B. mori eggs. We gratefully acknowledge the technical help of April Curtiss with bioassays.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departments of Biochemistry, Molecular Genetics and Entomology, The Ohio State University
(2)
Department of Biological Sciences, Campbell University
(3)
Syngenta, Inc.
(4)
Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Inc.
(5)
Neuroproteomics Facility, Duke University

References

  1. Carson R: Silent Spring. 1962, Cambridge, MA , The Riverside Press, 368-Google Scholar
  2. Rowe GE, Margaritis A, Dulmage HT: Bioprocess developments in the production of bioinsecticides by Bacillus thuringiensis. CRC Crit Rev Biotechnol. 1987, 6: 87-127. 10.3109/07388558709086986.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Losey JE, Rayor LS, Carter ME: Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature. 1999, 399: 214-10.1038/20338.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hodgson J: Monarch Bt-corn paper questioned. Nature Biotechnology. 1999, 17: 627-10.1038/10834.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Oberhauser KS, Prysby MD, Mittila HR, Stanley-Horn DE, Sears MK, Dively G, Olson E, Pleasants JM, Lam WKF, Hellmich RL: Temporal and spatial overlap between monarch larvae and corn pollen. Proc Nat'l Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 11913-11918. 10.1073/pnas.211234298.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Pleasants JM, Hellmich RL, Dively GP, Sears MK, Stanley-Horn DE, Mattila HR, Foster JE, Clark P, Jones GD: Corn pollen depositon on milkweeds in and near cornfields. Proc Nat'l Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 11919-11924. 10.1073/pnas.211287498.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sears MK, Hellmich RL, Stanley-Horn DE, Oberhauser KS, Pleasants JM, Mattila HR, Siegfried BD, Dively GP: Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: A risk assessment. Proc Nat'l Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 11937-11942. 10.1073/pnas.211329998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Stanley-Horn DE, Dively GP, Hellmich RL, Mattila HR, Sears MK, Rose R, Jesse LCH, Losey JE, Obrycki JJ, Lewis L: Assessing the impact of Cry1Ab-expressing corn pollen on monarch butterfly larvae in field studies. Proc Nat'l Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 11931-11936. 10.1073/pnas.211277798.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ishiwata S: On a kind of severe flacherie (sotto disease) (I.). Daihihon Sanshi Keiko. 1901, 9: 1-5.Google Scholar
  10. Schnepf E, Crickmore N, VanRie J, Lereclus D, Baum J, Feitelson J, Zeigler DR, Dean DH: Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998, 62: 775-806.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Miller JC: Field assessment of the effects of a microbial pest control agent on nontarget Lepidoptera. American Entomologist. 1990, 36 (2): 135-139.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Yaoi K, Kadotani T, Kuwana H, Shinkawa A, Takahashi T, H. I, Isato R: Aminopeptidase N from Bombyx mori as a candidate for the receptor of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Aa toxin. Eur J Biochem. 1997, 246: 652-657. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.t01-1-00652.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nagamatsu Y, Toda S, Koike T, Miyoshi Y, Shigematsu S, Kogure M: Cloning, sequencing, and expression of the Bombyx mori receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal CryIA(a) toxin. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1998, 62 (4): 727-734. 10.1271/bbb.62.727.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rajamohan F, Alcantara E, Lee MK, Chen XJ, Curtiss A, Dean DH: Single amino acid changes in domain II of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIAb d-endotoxin affect irreversible binding to Manduca sexta midgut membrane vesicles. J Bacteriol. 1995, 177: 2276-2282.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu SJ, Dean DH: Functional significance of loops in the receptor binding domain of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIIIA d-endotoxin. J Mol Biol. 1996, 255: 628-640. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0052.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rajamohan F, Dean DH: Molecular biology of bacteria on biological control of insects. Molecular Biology of the Biological Control of Pests and Diseases of Plants. Edited by: Gunasekaran M, Weber DJ. 1996, Boca Raton, FL , CRC Press, 105-122.Google Scholar
  17. Wu SJ, Koller CN, Miller DL, Bauer LS, Dean DH: Enhanced toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3A d-endotoxin in coleopterans by mutagenesis in a receptor binding loop. FEBS Letts. 2000, 473: 227-232. 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01505-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee MK, Jenkins JL, You TH, Curtiss A, Son JJ, Adang MJ, Dean DH: Mutations at the arginine residues in a8 loop of Bacillus thuringiensis d-endotoxin Cry1Ac affect toxicity and binding to Manduca sexta and Lymantria dispar aminopeptidase N. FEBS Letts. 2001, 497: 108-112. 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02446-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Grochulski P, Masson L, Borisova S, Pusztai-Carey M, Schwartz JL, Brousseau R, Cygler M: Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA(a) insecticidal toxin: crystal structure and channel formation. J Mol Biol. 1995, 254: 447-464. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0630.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ge AZ, Shivarova NI, Dean DH: Location of the Bombyx mori specificity domain on a Bacillus thuringiensis d-endotoxin protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989, 86: 4037-4041. 10.1073/pnas.86.11.4037.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Schnepf HE, Whiteley HR: Cloning and expression of the Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein gene in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981, 78: 2893-2897. 10.1073/pnas.78.5.2893.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee MK, Milne RE, Ge AZ, Dean DH: Location of a Bombyx mori receptor binding region on a Bacillus thuringiensis d-endotoxin. J Biol Chem. 1992, 267: 3115-3121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227: 680-685. 10.1038/227680a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rajamohan F, Cotrill JA, Gould F, Dean DH: Role of domain II, loop 2 residues of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIAb d-endotoxin in reversible and irreversible binding to Manduca sexta and Heliothis virescens. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 2390-2397. 10.1074/jbc.271.5.2390.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Softwear LO: POLO-PC: a user's guide to probit or logit analysis. 1987, Berkeley, California , LeOra SoftwearGoogle Scholar
  26. Wolfersberger M, Lüthy P, Maurer A, Parenti P, Sacchi FV, Giordana B, Hanozet GM: Preparation and partial characterization of amino acid transporting brush border membrane vesicles from the larval midgut of the cabbage butterfly (Pieris brassicae). Comp Biochem Physiol. 1987, 86A: 301-308. 10.1016/0300-9629(87)90334-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wolfersberger MG: Preparation and partial characterization of amino acid transporting brush border membrane vesicles from the larval midgut of the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar). Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 1993, 24: 139-147. 10.1002/arch.940240304.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee MK, Young BA, Dean DH: Domain III exchanges of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA toxins affect binding to different gypsy moth midgut receptors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995, 216: 306-312. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.2625.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nakanishi K, Yaoi K, Nagino Y, Hara H, Kitami M, Atsumi S, Miura N, Sato R: Aminopeptidase N isoforms from the midgut of Bombyx mori and Plutella xylostella -- their classification and the factors that determine their binding specificity to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A toxin. FEBS Lett. 2002, 519 (1-3): 215-220. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02708-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jenkins JL, Dean DH: Binding specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Aa for purified, native Bombyx mori aminopeptidase N and cadherin-like receptors. BMC Biochem. 2001, 2 (12): 1-7.Google Scholar
  31. Vadlamudi RK, Weber E, Ji I, Ji TH, Bulla LA: Cloning and expression of a receptor for an insecticidal toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 5490-5494. 10.1074/jbc.270.10.5490.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Francis BR, Bulla LA: Further characterization of BT-R1, the cadherin-like receptor for Cry1Ab toxin in tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta) midguts. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1997, 27: 541-550. 10.1016/S0965-1748(97)00029-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Keeton TP, Bulla LA: Ligand specificity and affinity of BT-R1, the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A toxin receptor from Manduca sexta, expressed in mammalian and insect cell cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997, 3419-3425.Google Scholar
  34. Keeton TP, Francis BR, Maaty WSA, Bulla LA: Effects of midgut-protein-preparative and ligand binding procedures on the toxin binding characteristics of BT-R1, a common high-affinity receptor in Manduca sexta for Cry1A Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998, 64 (6): 2158-2165.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Knight PJK, Crickmore N, Ellar DJ: The receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA(c) delta-endotoxin in the brush border membrane of the lepidopteran Manduca sexta is aminopeptidase N. Mol Microbiol. 1994, 11 (3): 429-436. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00324.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sangadala S, Walters FS, English LH, Adang MJ: A mixture of Manduca sexta aminopeptidase and phosphatase enhances Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal CryIA(c) toxin binding and 86Rb+-K+ efflux in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 10088-10092.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee MK, You TH, Young BA, Valaitis AP, Dean DH: Aminopeptidase N purified from gypsy moth BBMV is a specific receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis CryIAc toxin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996, 62: 2845-2849.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Luo K, Lu YJ, Adang MJ: A 106 kDa form of aminopeptidase is a receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis CryIC delta-endotoxin in the brush border membrane of Manduca sexta. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1996, 26: 783-791. 10.1016/S0965-1748(96)00027-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Valaitis AP, Jenkins JL, Lee MK, Dean DH, Garner KJ: Isolation and Partial Characterization of Gypsy Moth BTR-270, an Anionic Brush Border Membrane Glycoconjugate that Binds Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A Toxins with High Affinity. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology. 2001, 46: 186-200. 10.1002/arch.1028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Bravo A, Gomez I, Conde J, Munoz-Garay C, Sanchez J, Miranda R, Zhuang M, Gill SS, Suboron M: Oligomerization triggers binding of a Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab pore-forming toxin to aminopeptidase N receptor leading to insertion into membrane microdomains. Biochem Biophys Acta. 2004, 1667: 38-46. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.08.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim YS, Kanda K, Yamaguchi K, Kato F, Murata A: Genetic analysis of the Cry1Ab gene in Bacillus thuringiensis strain AF101. Appl Entomol Zool. 1998, 33: 441-447.Google Scholar
  42. Rajamohan F, Lee MK, Dean DH: Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal proteins: molecular mode of action. Progress in Nucleic Acids Research and Molecular Biology. 1998, Academic Press, 60: 1-27.Google Scholar
  43. Jenkins JL, Lee MK, Valaitis AP, Curtiss A, Dean DH: Bivalent sequential binding model of a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin to gypsy moth aminopeptidase N receptor. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 14423-14431. 10.1074/jbc.275.19.14423.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Jenkins JL, Dean DH: Exploring the mechanism of action of insecticidal proteins by genetic engineering methods. Genetic Engineering: Principles and Methods. Edited by: Setlow JK. 2000, New York , Plenum Press, 22: 33-54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Burton SL, Ellar DJ, Li J, Derbyshire DJ: N-acetylgalactosamine on the putative insect receptor aminopeptidase N is recognised by a site on the domain III lectin-like fold of a Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal toxin. J Mol Biol. 1999, 287: 1011-1022. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2649.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Cleland JL, Craik CS: Protein Engineering Principles and Practice. 1996, New York , Wiley-Liss, Inc, 518-Google Scholar
  47. Lee MK, You TH, Curtiss A, Dean DH: Involvement of two amino acid residues in the loop region of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin in toxicity and binding to Lymantria dispar. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996, 229: 139-146. 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1770.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rajamohan F, Alzate O, Cotrill JA, Curtiss A, Dean DH: Protein engineering of Bacillus thuringiensis d-endotoxin: mutations at domain II of Cry1Ab enhance receptor affinity and toxicity towards gypsy moth larvae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 14338-14343. 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14338.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. de Maagd RA, Kwa MSG, van der Klei H, Yamamoto T, Schipper B, Vlak JM, Stiekema WJ, Bosch D: Domain III substitution in Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA(b) results in superior toxicity for Spodoptera exigua and altered membrane protein recognition. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996, 62: 1537-1543.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© You et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement