Effect of polyamines and synthetic polyamine-analogues on the expression of antizyme (AtoC) and its regulatory genes
© Filippou et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 06 October 2006
Accepted: 15 January 2007
Published: 15 January 2007
In bacteria, the biosynthesis of polyamines is modulated at the level of transcription as well as post-translationally. Antizyme (Az) has long been identified as a non-competitive protein inhibitor of polyamine biosynthesis in E. coli. Az was also revealed to be the product of the atoC gene. AtoC is the response regulator of the AtoS-AtoC two-component system and it functions as the positive transcriptional regulator of the atoDAEB operon genes, encoding enzymes involved in short chain fatty acid metabolism. The antizyme is referred to as AtoC/Az, to indicate its dual function as both a transcriptional and post-translational regulator.
The roles of polyamines on the transcription of atoS and atoC genes as well as that of atoDAEB(ato) operon were studied. Polyamine-mediated induction was tested both in atoSC positive and negative E. coli backgrounds by using β-galactosidase reporter constructs carrying the appropriate promoters patoDAEB, patoS, patoC. In addition, a selection of synthetic polyamine analogues have been synthesized and tested for their effectiveness in inducing the expression of atoC/Az, the product of which plays a pivotal role in the feedback inhibition of putrescine biosynthesis and the transcriptional regulation of the ato operon. The effects of these compounds were also determined on the ato operon expression. The polyamine analogues were also tested for their effect on the activity of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), the key enzyme of polyamine biosynthesis and on the growth of polyamine-deficient E. coli.
Polyamines, which have been reported to induce the protein levels of AtoC/Az in E. coli, act at the transcriptional level, since they cause activation of the atoC transcription. In addition, a series of polyamine analogues were studied on the transcription of atoC gene and ODC activity.
Polyamines are indispensable cellular components implicated in many physiological functions, such as DNA replication and repair, transcription, protein synthesis and post-translational protein modifications . Together with magnesium ions, polyamines account for the majority of the intracellular cationic charges [2, 3] and they are essential for the normal cell growth and viability of almost all living cells [4, 5]. The intracellular polyamine concentrations need to be maintained within relatively narrow limits in order to both ensure optimal cell growth and avoid potential toxic effects arising from the presence of high concentrations of these polycations.
Polyamine homeostasis involves a combination of several sensitive feedback systems regulating their synthesis, degradation and transport . Regulation of polyamine biosynthesis is complex and the key biosynthetic enzyme, ODC is one of the most highly regulated enzymes . The protein levels of ODC and/or its activity are modulated at the transcriptional, translational and post-translational levels . The post-translational regulation of ODC is mainly mediated by polyamine-inducible non-competitive protein inhibitor(s), termed antizymes [9–13]. The mammalian antizyme has also been found to promote the ubiquitin-independent degradation of ODC by the 26S proteasome [14, 15], as well as to negatively regulate polyamine transport [16, 17].
In Escherichia coli, the biosynthesis of polyamines is modulated both at the level of transcription as well as post-translationally [18, 19]. The post-translational regulation of polyamine biosynthesis takes place either directly by feedback inhibition of ODC activity by polyamines  or indirectly by polyamine-inducible protein inhibitors [2, 9].
The E. coli antizyme (Az) has been identified as a non-competitive protein inhibitor of ODC, the synthesis of which is induced by polyamines [9, 10]. The cloning and sequencing of the E. coli Az gene  disclosed unexpectedly that Az might also have a second function as the transcriptional regulator of a two-component system (TCS) family . Indeed, it was shown that Az is identical to the gene product of atoC [23, 24], which is a positive transcriptional regulator of the atoDAEB operon genes, encoding enzymes involved in short chain fatty acid metabolism [25, 26]. Therefore, the Az is now referred to as AtoC/Az, to indicate its dual function as both a transcriptional and post-translational regulator [27, 28].
TCSs are usually composed of an inner membrane sensor histidine kinase and a cognate response regulator, which frequently is a transcriptional activator . Recent work from our laboratory has provided biochemical evidence that AtoS is indeed a membrane-bound sensor histidine kinase that phosphorylates the response regulator AtoC/Az, both constituting a TCS [27, 28]. The ability of a recombinant cytosolic region of AtoS to autophosphorylate, albeit at a very low rate, has also been demonstrated in a recent global analysis of E. coli TCSs . The in vitro trans-phosphorylation of the AtoC/Az by a truncated form of its cognate AtoS kinase, where both proteins were expressed as recombinant his-tagged fusions, has also been demonstrated by our group (unpublished data). Acetoacetate is the only inducer of the AtoS-AtoC TCS identified thus far, for the activation of the AtoS-AtoC TCS. Upon activation, AtoS-catalyzed AtoC phoshorylation is essential for the transcriptional activation of the atoDAEB operon, the products of which are essential for the catabolism of short-chain fatty acids [25, 26]. Recent global analyses of the E. coli TCSs [29, 30] have revealed that the AtoS-AtoC TCS might not affect solely atoDAEB regulation but it could be involved in a number of additional processes such as flagella synthesis, chemotaxis  and sodium but not potassium sensitivity . The cross-regulation between AtoS-AtoC and EnvZ-OmpR TCSs has been also reported, as mutations in the latter TCS affect expression of atoC . According to our data, the AtoS-AtoC TCS also acts directly on the atoDAEB operon transcription to enhance poly-hydroxy-butyrate (cPHB) biosynthesis in E. coli .
The Az levels are induced when polyamine levels rise , which is expected for a protein which elicits its effects by binding stoichiometrically to ODC. However, the mechanisms for this induction vary in different organisms. The mammalian antizyme levels are mainly regulated at the level of translation by polyamine-inducible programmed +1 ribosomal frameshifting , whereas the levels of the E. coli antizyme-like proteins S20 and L34 are regulated at the transcriptional level [18, 19].
Although the levels of the E. coli AtoC/Az have been found to increase upon cell exposure to high polyamine concentrations, there has been no evidence on the molecular basis of this induction. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the mechanism of polyamine-mediated induction of AtoC/Az in E. coli.
Polyamine analogues have been developed and used as probes in an effort to clarify the functions of natural polyamines [33, 34] as well as potential cancer chemotherapeutic agents and in treating several parasitic diseases [35–39]. Here we used 14 newly synthesized polyamine analogues as tools for monitoring the mechanism(s) by which endogenous polyamines: a) modulate AtoC/Az levels by affecting atoC gene transcription, b) affect transcription of other genes that share a topological and/or functional relevance with atoC, i.e. the neighboring atoS gene, encoding the AtoS kinase of the AtoS-AtoC TCS, and the atoDAEB operon which is regulated by AtoC/Az, and c) alter the activity of ODC, the key enzyme for polyamine biosynthesis.
Effect of putrescine and spermidine on the transcription of the atoS-atoC two component system genes and the ato operon
The specificity of this effect was demonstrated through the lack of activation upon polyamine addition, of either the ato operon promoter, when atoA-lacZ (Fig. 2 &3) or atoD1-lacZ constructs were used (extending 460 and 240 bp upstream of the translational start of atoD gene, respectively), or atoS (data not shown) for all three E. coli strains tested.
Effect of the physiological polyamines and diaminopropane on the activation of the atoC gene
Effect of polyamine analogues on the transcription of the atoC and ato operon genes of E. coli strain MA255 (speB-, speC-) and BW25113 strain
The effect of the polyamine analogues on the growth of a polyamine-dependent E. coli strain was investigated. E. coli MA255, whose growth depends on the presence of polyamines, were cultivated in media containing polyamine analogues (1 mM) or 0.5 mM putrescine and 0.5 mM spermidine (i.e. 1 mM in total). Following a longer lag period in the presence of the polyamine analogues, the bacteria displayed similar doubling times during the logarithmic phase irrespective of the polyamine or analogue used (data not shown).
Effect of polyamine analogues in the transcriptional activation of the atoC gene and atoDAEB operon in E. coli strain MA255.
% β-galactosidase activity MA255/(atoC-lacZ)
% β-galactosidase activity MA255/(atoA-lacZ)
Control (Putrescine & spermidine/0.3 mM each)
1 mM concentration
67 ± 4.86
200 ± 10.66
142 ± 8.69
181 ± 2.09
135 ± 4.69
177 ± 1.39
43 ± 3.11
38 ± 2.38
78 ± 2.56
155 ± 9.12
179 ± 10.9
114 ± 3.66
110 ± 8.50
208 ± 8.80
108 ± 10.93
59 ± 5.74
119 ± 7.34
43 ± 8.80
124 ± 10.30
64 ± 10.66
172 ± 6.42
45 ± 5.85
248 ± 8.02
69 ± 8.14
169 ± 8.66
111 ± 10.24
452 ± 2.17
218 ± 6.77
Effect of polyamine analogues in the transcriptional activation of the atoC gene and atoDAEB operon in E. coli strain BW25113.
% β-galactosidase activity BW25113/(atoC-lacZ)
% β-galactosidase activity BW25113/(atoA-lacZ)
Control (No polyamines added)
1 mM concentration
98 ± 3.38
88 ± 1.98
98 ± 1.9
80 ± 5.96
156 ± 1.62
79 ± 1.59
80 ± 1.41
58 ± 2.49
105 ± 1.38
107 ± 3.37
107 ± 1.82
60 ± 2.84
128 ± 1.73
52 ± 3.76
170 ± 4.29
110 ± 3.28
125 ± 1.63
76 ± 1.93
216 ± 3.92
233 ± 6.30
200 ± 4.19
87 ± 2.26
238 ± 6.44
128 ± 5.47
185 ± 9.81
202 ± 9.68
303 ± 6.80
193 ± 7.35
It was found that some of these analogues activated the transcription of the reporter genes more than their parent polyamines. In general, the most potent transcriptional activators (compounds 10, 12 and 14) were putrescine and diaminopropane (DAP) analogues. Comparison of these two types of analogues (e.g. 8 against 12, 9 against 13 and 11 against 14), revealed that the most active compounds were clearly the DAP analogues. Compound 14 was the most potent activator of both atoDAEB and atoC promoters. The effects appeared to be specific since some of the analogues showed different action on the two promoters since they stimulated, at least to a certain extend atoC while they repressed the atoDAEB (ato) operon and vice versa. It is worth noticing that amongst spermine analogues, compound 4, bearing the strongly basic guanidine group on atoms N-4 and N-9 of the SPM backbone repressed the synthesis of both atoC and atoDAEB operon.
Polyamine and polyamine analogues effect on AtoC/Az protein levels
Since polyamines and polyamine analogues activated the transcription of atoC/Az, it was investigated whether this activation also leads to AtoC/Az protein accumulation in the cell, thus affecting the translational mechanism.
Therefore, BW25113 cells were exposed to polyamines or their analogues, at the final concentration of 1 mM, grown to an OD600 0.8–0.9 and cell extracts were prepared as described for immunoblot analysis (Fig. 6b).
These experiments showed that AtoC/Az protein levels are induced by polyamines (lanes 3–5) and the most active polyamine analogues (12, 14, lanes 6, 8). This induction is clear despite the very low intracellular levels of AtoC/Az, which was barely detectable in total extracts from cells growing in the absence of polyamines (lane 2). Extracts from cells lacking the AtoC/Az protein (BW28878) were used as negative control and BW25113 cells transformed with plasmid pUC-Az  overexpressing AtoC/Az were used as a positive control for the blot.
Effect of polyamine analogues on ODC activity and protein levels
It has been demonstrated that polyamines cause a decrease in the E. coli ODC mRNA and protein levels and that the specific activity of ODC decreases significantly more than its protein levels, due to its post-translational inhibition by antizyme(s) [9, 18, 19]. Considering that the polyamine analogues, like polyamines can affect gene expression, their effects on ODC activity were also investigated.
Thus, the ODC activity was assayed in vitro using extracts from polyamine analogue-exposed E. coli cells. These extracts were prepared from cells grown in the mineral medium M9 to OD600 0.8–0.9 and the assays were performed as described in Methods. Provided that some polyamine analogues behaved like natural polyamines, it was expected that the specific activity of ODC would decrease as the levels of AtoC/antizyme, its post-translational inhibitor, rise .
Effect of polyamine analogues on ODC activity.
BW25113 strain/1 mM Substance
% ODC activity
% Inhibition of ODC activity
ODC Units/10 μl
Specific ODC activity (Units/mg protein)
239.5 ± 3.5
84.78 ± 0.5
76.33 ± 0.2
153.33 ± 2.5
211.17 ± 4.0
118.09 ± 0.3
99.44 ± 1.5
108.88 ± 2.3
82.42 ± 0.2
Polyamines are essential cellular components for the growth and proliferation of all living cells. Regulation of polyamine biosynthesis is complex and the key biosynthetic enzyme ODC, is one of the most highly regulated enzymes , the levels and/or activity of which are modulated at the transcriptional, translational and post-translational levels .
Antizyme is long known as a polyamine-inducible, non-competitive inhibitor of ODC [9, 13–15]. Az has also been found to be the product of atoC gene whose product is the response regulator of the AtoS-AtoC two component system. Recent work from our laboratory has shown that AtoS and AtoC indeed constitute a two component system and that they participate in atoDAEB operon expression upon acetoacetate induction [27, 28].
E. coli Az is induced by polyamines and inhibits the activity of ODC by forming an Az-ODC complex . Little is known, however, about the mechanism of this induction, in contrast to the eukaryotic antizyme, which is induced by polyamines at the translational level [27, 32].
In this work we attempted to elucidate the way by which polyamines induce AtoC/Az in E. coli and furthermore to clarify their effect in the transcription of other genes that share a topological and/or functional relevance with atoC/Az. The measurement of the β-galactosidase activity in cells carrying various promoter-laZ constructs indicated that atoC, but no other gene tested, expression was activated upon growth in increasing polyamine concentrations. This activation in atoC expression was not strain-specific since it was manifested in all three E. coli strains studied.
The combination of both putrescine and spermidine was not required since atoC expression was found to be induced by each polyamine alone (Fig. 4). The data derived from both E. coli MA255 (Fig. 4) and BW25113 strains (Table 2) indicated that PUT and the non-natural diamine DAP were the main transcriptional effectors. The in vivo transcriptional effects of DAP and PUT suggested that a distance of three to four carbon atoms between the two amino groups had the maximal effect on the transcriptional activation of the atoC. The specificity of PUT and DAP to exert this effect was strengthened by the inability of the multivalent SPD or SPM to activate the atoC gene.
Subsequently 14 polyamine analogues were synthesized and tested both for their ability to support the growth of a polyamine-dependent E. coli strain and to affect an essential biological process, such as the transcriptional activation of genes of atoDAEB operon.
Most of these analogues, at the final concentration of 1 mM, were used by E. coli strain MA255 as carbon sources and supported cell growth. The analogues demonstrated a differential effect on gene expression as evidenced by the facts that: i) a number of analogues activated the atoC transcription, without affecting the transcription of the ato operon (compound 12) and vice versa (compounds 1&7) and ii) some of the analogues seemed to activate both the atoDAEB (atoA-lacZ) and the atoC transcription (atoC-lacZ) (compounds 10, 14, Table 2.). These results could not attributed to a broad effect of these compounds, since the levels of the heat shock protein DnaK were not affected, as shown by immunoblot analysis of total extracts of cells exposed to these analogues (Fig. 6a).
Analysis of the effects of the different analogue types on atoC gene expression (e.g. 8 against 12, 9 against 13 and 11 against 14), revealed that the most active compounds were the DAP analogues, with compound 14 being the most potent. These data established the significance of charge distribution and chain flexibility on polyamine mode of action in atoC transcription.
In the cases where both atoC and atoDAED were activated by the analogues, the activation of atoDAEB could not be attributed to the enhanced intracellular accumulation of AtoC/Az, the product of atoC, but rather to their direct effects on atoDAEB transcription. This is surprising since none of the physiological polyamines produced an analogous effect.
The regulatory role of Az in the feed-back inhibition of ODC, the rate limiting enzyme in polyamine biosynthesis, was investigated by the ability of the PUT and DAP synthetic analogues to reduce the ODC activity in E. coli. The inhibition of ODC activity by these analogues (Table 3) could result from negative transcriptional effects of the polyamine analogues on speC, the gene that encodes ODC, or/and indirectly through antizyme induction, the intracellular accumulation of which would increase the proportion of ODC-Az inactive complex. The latter possibility was more probable in view of the fact that several polyamine analogues activated the expression of atoC, which encodes antizyme. Indeed, immunoblot analysis indicated that the analogues that activated atoC transcription also produced increased Az accumulation, without affecting ODC protein levels (Fig. 6b and 7).
Interestingly, elevated levels of ODC have been associated with highly proliferating cells [2, 3, 5, 7, 13, 33] and polyamine analogues as well as drugs that influence intracellular polyamine levels have shown antiproliferative activity [35–38]. Despite the differences between bacterial and eukaryotic mechanisms that govern Az induction and regulation of polyamine biosynthesis, substances that act as inducers of Az could reduce polyamine levels and provide a lead for the development of agents capable of cell growth arrest.
Polyamines, which have been reported to induce AtoC/Az in E. coli, activated the expression of atoC, the gene that encodes AtoC/Az. A series of synthetic polyamine analogues have been tested for their effectiveness on the expression of the atoC, as well as that of the atoDAEB (ato) operon. Putrescine and diaminopropane analogues, activated atoC transcription, indicative of the structural requirements of diamines for Az induction. In addition, this atoC induction resulted in accumulation of Az protein and inhibition of ODC activity. This inhibition is likely due to the formation of inactive ODC-Az complexes, since in bacteria grown in the presence of polyamine analogues did not affect the ODC protein levels.
Bacterial strains, plasmids and culture conditions
E. coli K-12 strains were transformed with the appropriate plasmids. E. coli strain MA255 [F-, thr-, leuB6(Am), fhuA2?, lacY1, glnV44(AS)?, gal-6, λ-, relA1?, CanR?-1, speB, speC, rpsL133(strR), χylA7, mtlA2, thi-] was obtained from E. coli genetic stock Center, Department of MCDB, Yale university.
E. coli K-12 BW25113 [lacI q rrnB3 ΔlacZ4787 hsdR514 DE(araBAD)567 DE(rhaBAD)568 rph-1] and BW28878 [BW25113, lacking AtoS-AtoC system, ΔatoSC] were a kind gift from Dr Hirofumi Aiba (Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, School of Agriculture, Nagoya University, Japan).
The genetic organisation of the ato locus is shown in Figure 1a. The plasmids used in this study are carrying various promoters of genes, fused to a promoterless lacZ gene on pMLB1034 vector. These reporter constructs, carrying the promoters of the ato operon and the regulatory atoS-atoC two component system genes, can direct the synthesis of the lacZ gene under the control of their cognate promoters. pCPG4 (atoS-lacZ), pMLB-patoD1(atoD1-lacZ), pCPG5 (atoA-lacZ) and pCPG6 (atoC-lacZ), are carrying the atoS promoter, various lengths of the atoDAEB promoter (extending 240 and 460 bp upstream the translational start of the atoD gene, respectively) and the atoC promoter (Fig 1b)
E. coli cells were grown at 37°C with vigorous shaking in M9 minimal medium , supplemented with 0.1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.5% w/v glucose, 1.7 μM FeSO4, 1 μg/ml thiamine, 50 μg/ml DL-leucine and threonine (for the growth of MA255) and 80 μg/ml DL-proline (for BW25113 and BW28878 strains). Ampicillin was used at the final concentration of 100 μg/ml.
E. coli strain MA255 lacking the biosynthetic enzymes ODC and agmatine ureohydrolase (AUH), is unable to synthesize polyamines and grows only in the presence of exogenously supplied polyamines. Therefore, polyamines (PUT and SPD) were also added in the growth medium at the final concentration of 0.05 mM which was the lowest concentration necessary for growth.
The strains to be tested were grown overnight, then diluted 10-fold in the growth medium containing polyamines or polyamine analogues and the cells were grown to OD600 0.4–0.7. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8000 × g and washed twice with M9 before the β-galactosidase assay.
For the in vitro ODC activity assay, E. coli cells were grown in M9 mineral medium, in the absence or presence of 1 mM polyamines or polyamine analogues. The cells were harvested when the cultures reached late logarithmic phase OD600 0.8–0.9 by centrifugation at 8000 × g for 10 min. The cell pellets were washed twice with ice-cold buffer saline and stored at -20°C until use.
β-Galactosidase activity assays were performed using the the E. coli MA255 (speC-, speB-), BW25113 (atoSC+) and BW28878(ΔatoSC), carrying the appropriate plasmids, as described previously . In all experiments, strains carrying plasmid pMLB1034 were used as negative controls.
An aliquot of 1 ml of each culture prepared as decribed for the β-galactosidase assays or ODC activity assays, was centrifuged and resuspended in SDS loading buffer of 1.5X (75 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 3% w/v SDS, 0.15% w/v bromophenol blue, 15% v/v glycerol and β-mercaptoethanol at a final concentration of 10% v/v), boiled for 5 minutes and kept at -20°C for immunoblot analysis.
ODC activity assay
The cell pellets were suspended in 0.5 ml ice-cold ODC assay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 50 μM 5'-phosphate pyridoxal, 5 mM dithiothreitol), disrupted by sonication in an ice bath for 12 min and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Enzyme activity of ODC was assayed in the supernatant of each culture. 10 μl of each supernatant, was incubated with 35 μl ODC assay buffer and 5 μl DL-[1-14C]ornithine 0.028 μmol, for 1 h at 37°C. The reaction was terminated with the addition of 0.2 ml of 10% trichloroacetic acid. ODC activity was measured from the liberation of 14CO2 from the DL-[1-14C]ornithine, which was captured on filter paper that was pre-treated with 25 μl soluene-350 and air dried. Filter paper was placed in liquid scintillation fluid. Radioactivity was counted as DPM and expressed in units, as it was defined . The remainder of supernatant was analyzed for protein concentration using Bradford method .
Synthesis of polyamine analogues
Spermine analogues 1–4
These compounds were obtained, as the corresponding di-(1,2) and tetra-(3,4) trifluoroacetate salts, through routine trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)-mediated deprotection of the corresponding fully protected, with the trityl (primary amino functions) and the tert-butoxycarbonyl (guanidine functions) protecting groups, precursors. The precursors to compounds 1 and 3 and 2 and 4 were obtained according to reported procedures [42, 43].
Spermidine analogues 5–7
These compounds were obtained, as the corresponding di-(5,7) and tri-(6) trifluoroacetate salts, through routine trifluoroacetic acid(TFA)-mediated deprotection of the corresponding fully protected, with the trityl (primary amino functions) and the tert-butoxycarbonyl (guanidine function) protecting groups, precursors (Fig. 5b). The precursors to compounds 5 and 6 [42–44] and to the compound 7  were obtained according to reported procedures.
Putrescine analogues 8–14
Compounds 8, 9, 12 and 13 were obtained, as the corresponding trifluoroacetate salts, through routine trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)-mediated deprotection of the corresponding protected, with the trityl (primary amino function) protecting group, precursors (fig. 5c). The precursors to compounds 8, 9, 12 and 13 were prepared according to reported procedure . Compound 10 was obtained from the N-tritylated compound 9, through catalytic hydrogenolysis . Finally, compounds 11 and 14 were prepared, as the corresponding trifluoroacetate salts, through routine trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)-mediated deprotection of the corresponding protected, with the trityl (primary amino function) protecting group, precursors. The latter were obtained according to a recently developed protocol in our laboratory for the selective N-tetrazolation of polyamines.
The rabbit polyclonal antibodies against E. coli ODC, Az and DnaK used in this study have been described [19, 28, 48]. The anti-Az antibody was negatively purified against cross-linked total protein extracts from the Az- E. coli strain BW28878. E. coli cells BW28878 were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) at 37°C to an OD600 1.5, were harvested and washed twice with saline. Cells were suspended in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl) and lysed by lysozyme treatment (1 mg. ml-1), for 60 min at 4°C, and sonication. The cell lysate was centrifuged at 9,000 × g (SS-34 rotor) for 20 min at 4°C to remove cell debris and unbroken cells and the supernatant was treated with DNAse I (3 units. ml-1) and RNAse A (10 μg. ml-1) for 30 min at 4°C. The lysate was further centrifuged at 9,000 × g (SS-34 rotor) for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatant was stirred with formaldehyde 1% at 4°C for 1 hour. 0.2 M Glycine was then added to react with the remaining formaldehyde, for 30 minutes. The cross-linking of proteins by formaldehyde led to the formation of a white protein complex. The protein pellet was centrifuged at 8000 × g for 15 min, washed three times with 5 ml PBS-Glycine 0.2 M, pH 8.0 and incubated overnight at 4°C with the 400μl serum of the rabbit polyclonal antibody of antizyme. The protein pellet of BW28878 cells could absorb all the antibodies except from that of Az because of the lack of the AtoSC proteins. The serum was centrifuged and the supernatant is the purified antibody used for the immunoblot analysis in this study.
Electrophoresis and immunoblotting
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed using 10%(w/v) polyacrylamide gels, as described by Laemmli et al . Proteins were transferred to immobilon PVDF membranes following the method of Towbin et al.  and immunostained with the rabbit polyclonal antibodies against, ODC, Az and DnaK, respectively, prepared as described [19, 28, 48].
two component system
This work was supported in part by "Pythagoras Postdoctoral Research Grant" from the Hellenic Ministry of Education (D.A.K. & P.S.F.).
- Tabor CW, Tabor H: Polyamines in microorganisms. Microbiol Rev. 1985, 49: 81-99.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Canellakis ES, Viceps-Madore D, Kyriakidis DA, Heller JS: The regulation and function of ornithine decarboxylase and of the polyamines. Current Topics in Cellular Regulation. Edited by: Horecker BL, Stadtman ER. 1979, New York: Academic Press Inc, 15: 155-202.Google Scholar
- Pegg AE: Polyamine metabolism and its importance in neoplastic growth and a target for chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 1988, 48: 759-774.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marton LJ, Pegg AE: Polyamines as targets for therapeutic intervention. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1995, 35: 55-91. 10.1146/annurev.pa.35.040195.000415.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen SS: A guide to the polyamines. 1998, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell LA, Leyser A, Holtorff MS, Bates JS, Frydman B, Valasinas AL, Reddy VK, Marton LJ: Antizyme induction by polyamine analogues as a factor of cell growth inhibition. Biochem J. 2002, 366: 663-671. 10.1042/BJ20011612.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pegg AE: Recent advances in the biochemistry of polyamines in eukaryotes. Biochem J. 1986, 234: 249-262.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davis RH, Morris DR, Coffino P: Sequestered end products and enzyme regulation: the case of ornithine decarboxylase. Microbiol Rev. 1992, 56: 280-290.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kyriakidis DA, Heller JS, Canellakis ES: Modulation of ornithine decarboxylase activity in Escherichia coli by positive and negative effectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA). 1978, 75: 4699-4703. 10.1073/pnas.75.10.4699.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heller JS, Fong WF, Canellakis ES: Induction of a protein inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase by the end products of its reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA). 1976, 73: 1858-1862. 10.1073/pnas.73.6.1858.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fujita K, Matsufuji S, Murakami Y, Hayashi S: Antizyme to ornithine decarboxylase is present in the liver of starved rats. Biochem J. 1984, 218: 557-562.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kitani T, Fujisawa H: Purification and some properties of a protein inhibitor (antizyme) of ornithine decarboxylase from rat liver. J Biol Chem. 1984, 259: 1036-1040.Google Scholar
- Hayashi SI, Canellakis ES: Ornithine decarboxylase antizymes. International Encyclopaedia of Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Edited by: Hayashi SI. 1989, New York: Pergamon Press Inc, 129: 47-58.Google Scholar
- Glass JR, Gerner EW: Spermidine mediates degradation of ornithine decarboxylase by a non-lysosomal, ubiquitin-independent mechanism. J Cell Physiol. 1987, 130: 133-141. 10.1002/jcp.1041300119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenberg-Hasson Y, Bercovich Z, Ciechanover A, Kahana C: Degradation of ornithine decarboxylase in mammalian cells is ATP dependent but ubiquitin independent. Eur J Biochem. 1989, 185: 469-474. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb15138.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell JLA, Judd GG, Bareyal-Leyser A, Ling SY: Feedback repression of polyamine transport is mediated by antizyme in mammalian tissue-culture cells. Biochem J. 1994, 299: 19-22.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki T, Kashiwagi K, Murakami Y, Hayashi S, Igarashi K: Antizyme protects against abnormal accumulation and toxicity of polyamines in ornithine decarboxylase-overproducing cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA). 1994, 91: 8930-8934. 10.1073/pnas.91.19.8930.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang SC, Panagiotidis CA, Canellakis ES: Transcriptional effects of polyamines on ribosomal proteins and on polyamine-synthesizing enzymes in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA). 1990, 87: 3464-3468. 10.1073/pnas.87.9.3464.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Panagiotidis CA, Huang S, Canellakis ES: Post-translational and transcriptional regulation of polyamine biosynthesis in Escherichia coli . Int J Biochem. 1994, 26: 991-1001. 10.1016/0020-711X(94)90070-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morris DR, Wu WH, Applebaum D, Koffron KL: Regulatory Patterns in Putrescine Biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1970, 171: 968-976. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1970.tb39402.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Canellakis ES, Paterakis AA, Huang SC, Panagiotidis CA, Kyriakidis DA: Identification, cloning, and nucleotide sequencing of the ornithine decarboxylase antizyme gene of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1993, 90: 7129-7133. 10.1073/pnas.90.15.7129.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parkinson JS, Kofoid EC: Communication modules in bacterial signalling proteins. Annu Rev Genet. 1992, 26: 71-112. 10.1146/annurev.ge.26.120192.000443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blattner FR, Plunkett G, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, Riley M, Collado-Vides J, Glasner JD, Rode CK, Mayhew GF, Gregor J, Davis NW, Kirkpatrick HA, Goeden MA, Rose DJ, Mau B, Shao Y: The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science. 1997, 277: 1453-1474. 10.1126/science.277.5331.1453.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen C, Cooke PA, Rudd KE, Shanley MS: Direct submission EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ. 1994, Accession number Q06065Google Scholar
- Jenkins LS, Nunn WD: Genetic and molecular characterization of the genes involved in short-chain fatty acid degradation in Escherichia coli : the ato system. J Bacteriol. 1987, 169: 42-52.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jenkins LS, Nunn WD: Regulation of the ato operon by the atoC gene in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1987, 169: 2096-2102.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lioliou EE, Kyriakidis DA: The role of bacterial antizyme: From an inhibitory protein to AtoC transcriptional regulator. Microb Cell Fact. 2004, 3: 8-10.1186/1475-2859-3-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lioliou EE, Mimitou EP, Grigoroudis AI, Panagiotidis CH, Panagiotidis CA, Kyriakidis DA: Phosphorylation activity of the response regulator of the two-component signal transduction system AtoS-AtoC in E. coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1725: 257-268.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oshima T, Aiba H, Masuda Y, Kanaya S, Masahito S, Wanner BL, Mori H, Mizuno T: Transcriptome analysis of all two component regulatory system mutants of Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 2002, 46: 281-291. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03170.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou L, Lei X.-H, Bochner BR, Wanner BL: Phenotype Microarray analysis of Escherichia coli K-12 mutants with deletions of all two-component systems. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 4956-4972. 10.1128/JB.185.16.4956-4972.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Theodorou MC, Panagiotidis CA, Panagiotidis CH, Pantazaki AA, Kyriakidis DA: Involvement of the AtoS-AtoC signal transduction system in poly(- R)-3-hydroxybutyrate biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006, 1760: 896-906.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsufuji S, Matsufuji T, Miyazaki Y, Murakami Y, Atkins JF, Gesteland RF, Hayashi S: Autoregulatory frameshifting in decoding mammalian ornithine decarboxylase antizyme. Cell. 1995, 80: 51-60. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90450-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Higashi K, Yoshida K, Nishimura K, Momiyama E, Kashiwagi K, Matsufuji S, Shirahata A, Igarashi K: Structural and functional relationship among diamines in terms of inhibition of cell growth. J Biochem. 2004, 136: 533-539. 10.1093/jb/mvh150.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fogel-Petrovic M, Kramer DL, Vujcic S, Miller J, Mcmanis JS, Bergeron RJ, Porter CW: Structural basis for differential induction of spermidine/spermine N1-Acetyltransferase activity by novel spermine analogs. Molecular Pharmacology. 1997, 52: 69-74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Janne J, Alhonen L, Pietila M, Keinanen TA: Genetic approaches to the cellular functions of polyamines in mammals. Eur J Biochem. 2004, 271: 877-894. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04009.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holst CM, Frydman B, Marton LJ, Oredsson SM: Differential polyamine analogues effects in four human breast cancer cell lines. Toxicology. 2006, 223: 71-81. 10.1016/j.tox.2006.03.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang Y, Keen JC, Pledgie A, Marton LJ, Zhu T, Sukumar S, Park BH, Blair B, Brenner K, Cassero RA, Davidson NE: Polyamine analogues down-regulate estrogen receptor α expression in human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 19055-19063. 10.1074/jbc.M600910200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wallace HM, Fraser AV, Hughes A: A perspective of polyamine metabolism. Biochem J. 2003, 376: 1-14. 10.1042/BJ20031327.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reguera RM, Tekwani BL, Balana-Fouce R: Polyamine transport in parasites: A potential target for new antiparasitic drug development. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005, 140: 151-164. 10.1016/j.cca.2005.02.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller JH: A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics. 1992, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: NewYorkGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 1989, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: NewYorkGoogle Scholar
- Tsiakopoulos N, Damianakos C, Karigiannis G, Vahliotis D, Papaioannou D, Sindona G: Syntheses of crowned polyamines using isolable succinimidyl esters of N-tritylated linear amino acids and peptides. ARKIVOC. 2002, 13: 79-104.Google Scholar
- Athanassopoulos CM, Garnelis T, Pantazaka E, Papaioannou D: Efficient guanylation of N α , N ω -difunctionalized polyamines at the secondary amino functions. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 8815-8818. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.10.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vassis S, Govaris I, Voyagi K, Mamos P, Papaioannou D: Simple syntheses of the polyamine alkaloid tenuilobine and analogues using selectively N -tritylated polyamines and dicarboxylic acids as bridging elements. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43: 2597-2600. 10.1016/S0040-4039(02)00338-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Athanassopoulos CM, Garnelis T, Vahliotis D, Papaioannou D: Efficient syntheses of 5-aminoalkyl-1 H-tetrazoles and of polyamines incorporating tetrazole rings. Org Lett. 2005, 7: 561-564. 10.1021/ol0477069.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (London). 1970, 227: 680-685. 10.1038/227680a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J: Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from acrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA). 1979, 76: 4350-4354. 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Panagiotidis CA, Burkholder WF, Gaitanaris GA, Gragerov A, Gottesman ME, Silverstein SJ: Inhibition of DnaK autophosphorylation by heat shock proteins and polypeptide substrates. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 16643-16647.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.