Open Access

Identification of α-type subunits of the Xenopus 20S proteasome and analysis of their changes during the meiotic cell cycle

  • Yuka Wakata1,
  • Mika Tokumoto1, 2,
  • Ryo Horiguchi1, 2,
  • Katsutoshi Ishikawa1,
  • Yoshitaka Nagahama2, 3 and
  • Toshinobu Tokumoto1, 2Email author
BMC Biochemistry20045:18

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2091-5-18

Received: 21 September 2004

Accepted: 17 December 2004

Published: 17 December 2004

Abstract

Background

The 26S proteasome is the proteolytic machinery of the ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic system responsible for most of the regulated intracellular protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. Previously, we demonstrated meiotic cell cycle dependent phosphorylation of α4 subunit of the 26S proteasome. In this study, we analyzed the changes in the spotting pattern separated by 2-D gel electrophoresis of α subunits during Xenopus oocyte maturation.

Results

We identified cDNA for three α-type subunits (α1, α5 and α6) of Xenopus, then prepared antibodies specific for five subunits (α1, α3, α5, α6, and α7). With these antibodies and previously described monoclonal antibodies for subunits α2 and α4, modifications to all α-type subunits of the 26S proteasome during Xenopus meiotic maturation were examined by 2D-PAGE. More than one spot for all subunits except α7 was identified. Immunoblot analysis of 26S proteasomes purified from immature and mature oocytes showed a difference in the blots of α2 and α4, with an additional spot detected in the 26S proteasome from immature oocytes (in G2-phase).

Conclusions

Six of α-type subunits of the Xenopus 26S proteasome are modified in Xenopus immature oocytes and two subunits (α2 and α4) are modified meiotic cell cycle-dependently.

Background

Eukaryotic cells, from yeast to human, contain large nonlysosomal proteases called proteasomes [1]. The 26S proteasome is part of the ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic system, which regulates proteins through a mechanism of selective degradation [24]. The 26S proteasome is composed of a 20S proteasome as a catalytic core and regulatory particles at either end. The subunits of the 20S proteasome subunits can be classified into two families, α and β. In eukaryotes, the 20S proteasome contains seven α-type subunits and seven β-type subunits. The fourteen kinds of subunits are arranged in four rings of seven subunits and form an α7β7β7α7 structure [5].

Fully grown frog oocytes arrest in the late G2 phase of meiosis. Maturation-inducing hormone (MIH) acts on the oocytes, inducing final maturation and triggering germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD), and the oocytes arrest again at the second meiotic metaphase until fertilization. The proteasomes are thought to be involved in regulating the maturation and fertilization of oocytes [6, 7]. Previously we identified the proteasomal subunit modified during oocyte maturation in Xenopus and goldfish as α 4 [8, 9]. In the present study, we cloned three unidentified α-type subunits of Xenopus and prepared antibodies for a total of five subunits. Using a set of specific antibodies, we analyzed changes in all α subunits composing the 26S proteasome during the meiotic cell cycle. We demonstrated that 6 of the subunits exist as a heterogeneous population in frog oocytes and identified another subunit in addition to α4 which was modified meiotic cell cycle dependently.

Results and discussion

Isolation and characterization of cDNA clones

A BLAST search of the Xenopus EST database was conducted using known proteasomal subunit α cDNAs. From the data for each subunit, full-length ORFs were obtained by PCR. The amplified cDNAs were 741, 726 and 786 bp long. The clones encode proteins of 246, 241 and 261 amino acid residues with a predicted molecular mass of 27463, 26402 and 29327 daltons, respectively (Fig. 1). Comparison of the amino acid sequence revealed that these molecules are highly homologous to the α1, α5 and α6 subunits in humans (overall identity 91.5–95.4%) [10, 11], Drosophila (53.2–69.1%) [12, 13] and yeast (53.2–61.7%) [1416] (Fig. 2). Thus, we concluded that the cDNAs isolated in this study encode the α1, α5 and α6 subunits of the Xenopu s 20S proteasome. We named these clones α1_xl, α5_xl and α6_xl (α1, α5 and α6 subunits of Xenopus laevis) according to a systematic nomenclature [5]. Figure 2 represents a comparison of amino acid sequences predicted from cDNA sequences of α-type subunits of the Xenopus 20S proteasome. Overall identity between the subunits was 25.1–38.4 %. A consensus sequence for α-type proteasomal subunits was conserved. Interestingly, a conserved sequence for β-type proteasomal subunits was found in the α3 subunit [17].
Figure 1

Amino acid sequence comparison of the Xenopus , human, Drosophila , and Yeast α 1 , α 5 and α 6 proteasome subunits. Amino acid sequence comparisons of α1 (A), α5 (B) and α6 (C) proteasome subunits are indicated. Matched sequences are boxed. Consensus sequences for calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII), cAMP/cGMP-dependent kinase (cAMP/cGMP), casein kinase II (CKII) and Ca2+-dependent kinase (PKC) are indicated. The numbers refer to the amino acid position at the end of each line.

Figure 2

Amino acid sequence comparison of the Xenopus proteasomal α subunits. Matched sequences are boxed. The proteasomal α-type and β-type signatures were detemined by using the 'PROSITE' database [17] and are boxed. The numbers refer to the amino acid position at the end of each line.

Comparison of proteasomes purified from immature and mature oocytes

Polyclonal antibodies specific for five subunits (α1, α3, α5, α6, and α7) were raised against purified recombinant proteins. The specificity of the antibodies was examined by immunoblotting with the cytosol fraction and the purified 26S proteasome (Fig. 3). Each antibody preparation displayed a specific reaction for different polypeptides in both samples. Recombinant proteins from the cDNAs clearly cross-reacted with each antibody (data not shown). Thus, specific antibodies for each subunit were prepared. With these antibodies and previously described monoclonal antibodies for subunits α2 and α4 [18], changes to all α-type subunits during Xenopus meiotic maturation were analyzed. The modifications were demonstrated by 2D-PAGE (Fig. 4). The α7 subunit antibodies gave a single spot but all of the other antisera produced more than one spot, suggesting that the α1–α6 subunits undergo some type of modification in oocytes of Xenopus as demonstrated in other species [19, 20]. A difference in the spots between the 26S proteasome from immature and mature oocytes was detected in the blots of subunits α2 and α4. In blots of α2 and α4, only a major spot was detected in the 26S proteasome from mature oocytes (in M-phase). It is suggested that the α4 subunit is phosphorylated in immature oocytes and dephosphorylated in mature oocytes [8]. Likewise, it is speculated that part of the α2 subunit is phosphorylated in interphase and dephosphorylated in metaphase. These results suggest that the subunits of 26S proteasomes are changed by meiotic cell cycle-dependent modifications. It can be speculated that these modifications are involved in the regulation of the meiotic cell cycle.
Figure 3

Immunoblotting of the cytosol fraction and purified 26S proteasome. The cytosol fraction and purified 26S proteasome were electrophoresed under denaturing conditions (10.0% gel) and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBBR), or immunostained with antibodies for α subunits of the 20S proteasome. Lanes cyt and 26S indicate the cytosol fraction and the 26S proteasome from immature oocytes, respectively. Molecular masses of standard proteins are indicated at the left. Protein bands of each subunit are indicated by arrows.

Figure 4

2D-PAGE analysis of 26S proteasomes from immature and mature oocytes. The 26S proteasomes from immature (I) and mature (M) oocytes were subjected to 2D-PAGE followed by immunostaining with polyclonal antibodies against each of the Xenopus 20S proteasome subunits as indicated. The spots detected by each antibody are represented at high magnification and indicated by arrows. The spots differing between immature and mature oocytes are indicated by asterisks.

The modification of proteasomal subunits and factors interacting with proteasomes may be involved in the regulation of proteasome function [21]. By two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, up to 20 different polypeptides were separated from the 20S proteasome which was shown to be composed of 14 gene products [22]. Furthermore, changes in proteasomal subunit composition under different physiological conditions and the likely existence of a different subpopulation of proteasomes have been reported [12, 23]. All these results suggest that the subunit composition of proteasomes, and likely their activity, is under complex control in vivo. Some of these changes may be due to post-translational modifications of the proteasomal subunits. Regarding protein modification, there have been several reports about the phosphorylation of proteasomal subunits. Phosphorylated proteasomal subunits were detected in crude preparations from cultured Drosophila cells [22]. Several subunits of the 20S proteasome could be phosphorylated in vitro by a cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase copurifying with the bovine pituitary 20S proteasome [24]. Castaño et al. [25] (1996) identified the CKII phosphorylating subunit and its phosphorylation sites as the C8 component (α7 subunit) and serine-243 and serine-250, respectively. CKII was also reported to phosphorylate the C2 component (α6 subunit) in rice [26]. The phosphorylation of subunits in the 26S proteasome in vivo was investigated using cultured human cells. Mason et al. [27] (1996) showed the phosphorylated subunits to be the C8 (α7 subunit) and C9 (α3 subunit) components in the 20S core, and the S4 (Rpt2p) subunit and several other components in regulatory particles [28]. Recent approaches have revealed post-translational modifications to many of the subunits. In the yeast 20S proteasome, the α2- and α4-subunits are phosphorylated at either a serine or threonine residue, and the α7-subunit is phosphorylated at tyrosine residue(s) [20]. In the human 20S proteasome, more than two spots were identified in all α-type subunits except α5 and phosphorylation of the α7-subunit at serine-250 was revealed [19]. However the sites and kinases responsible for the phosphorylation of the α2 and α4 subunits of the 20S proteasome have yet to be demonstrated. The modification of these proteins is one possible mechanism regulating the functions of the 26S proteasome during the meiotic cell cycle. Consensus sequences for phosphorylation sites are conserved in these subunits [8, 29]. Cyclic-AMP dependent protein kinase is responsible for the G2/M and metaphase/anaphase transitions [30]. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II is shown to be involved in the exit from metaphase II arrest at fertilization in Xenopus [31]. It can be hypothesized that these kinases are involved in the regulation of 26S proteasome activity. The identification of kinases and the phosphorylation sites of the α2 and α4 subunits may reveal how the modification of proteasomal subunits is involved in controlling the cell cycle. Currently, we have identified one of the protein kinase for α4 subunit as Casein KinaseIα [32]. Possible regulation of 26S proteasome activity by this kinase is under investigation.

Recently, alternative subunits of proteasomes have been identified. In Drosophila where alternative α-type, β-type and 19S cap subunits are expressed from separate genes during spermatogenesis [33] and in Arabidopsis and rice where alternative isoforms of most proteasome subunits are differentially expressed from separate genes during development [34, 35]. There are also examples of alternative β-type subunits in mammals (e.g., γ-interferon inducible "immunoproteasome" subunits β1i, β2i and β5i) [36]. Alternative subunits have yet to be identified in Xenopus, there is a possibility that the changes in the spots identified in this study may derive from differential expression of alternative subunits from paralogous genes.

Conclusions

(1) cDNAs for three α-type proteasome subunits (α1_xl, α5_xl and α6_xl) of X. laevis were identified.

(2) Six subunits but not α7_XL are modified in immature oocytes in X. laevis.

(2) α2, α4_XLs are modified during the meiotic cell cycle in X. laevis.

Methods

Purification of proteasomes

Frogs (Xenopus laevis) were purchased from Jo-hoku Seibutsu Kyozai (Shizuoka, Japan) and maintained till used. 26S proteasomes were purified from immature oocytes and ovulated oocytes as described [37].

Electrophoresis and immunoblotting

SDS-PAGE was carried out according to the method of Laemmli [38] (1970). 2D-PAGE (first dimension, NEPHGE; second dimension, SDS-PAGE) was carried out as described by O'Farrell et al. [39] (1977) using a precast polyacrylamide gel for NEPHGE (Immobiline Dry Strip pH3-10NL and pH6-11L for α4 subunit, Amersham biosciences) as reported [8]. Electroblotting and detection using antibodies were conducted as described [18].

cDNA cloning and sequencing

Identification and sequence analysis of cDNAs. A BLAST search of the Xenopus EST database was conducted using known proteasomal subunit α cDNAs. From the data obtained for each subunit, independent sequences were linked and the full-length ORF sequences were eliminated(α1: BG347128 and CB558360, α5: BQ398972 and BJ043946, α6: BJ072624 and BJ091555). The specific primers for amplification of the full-length ORF were α1: 5'-GGAATTCCATATGTCTCGGGGATCTAGCGCG-3' and 5'-CCGCTCGAGGTCACGCTCAGCTAGTGCAAC-3', α5: 5'-GGAATTCCATATGTTCCTAACCCGCTCCGAG-3' and 5'-CCGCTCGAGGATGTCCTTAATAACTTCCTC-3', and α6: 5'-GGAATTCCATATGTTTCGCAATCAGTATG-3' and 5'-CCGCTCGAGGTGCTCCATAGGCTCCTCCTGC-3'), in which EcoRI (5'end) and XhoI (3'end) recognition sequence was added for cloning to the vector pET21a (Novagen). PCR was carried out using KOD DNA polymerase (TOYOBO) or LA taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa), with Xenopus ovarian cDNA as a template, and the product was cloned to pET21a. The DNA sequencing was performed using a 377A DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The sequences that include the full-length ORF identified here were deposited into GenBank (accession nos. AB164677, AB164678 and AB164679 for α1_xl, α5_xl and α6_xl, respectively). Pairwise comparisons of sequence homology were conducted using the Genetyx-Mac ver.12 computer program (Software Development, Tokyo, Japan).

Production of recombinant proteins and preparation of antibodies

The recombinant proteins were produced in E. coli BL21 (LysE) and purified by SDS-PAGE as described [6]. Polyclonal antibodies specific for each subunit were raised against purified recombinant proteins according to a procedure described before using guinea pigs [40]. Anti serums, which recognize the bands of each subunit, were obtained.

Abbreviations

bp: 

base pair

BLAST: 

basic local alignment search tool

cDNA: 

DNA complementary to RNA

EST: 

expressed sequence tags

kDa: 

kilodalton

NEPHGE: 

non-equilibrium pH gradient gel electrophoresis

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

SDS-PAGE: 

SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

2D-PAGE: 

two-dimensional-PAGE.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Matsuda for nucleotide sequence analysis. This work was supported by the CREST Research Project of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation to Y.N. and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. Part of this study was carried out under the National Institute for Basic Biology Cooperative Research Program (3–107 and 4–110 to T.T). M.T. is a Research Fellow of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biology and Geosciences, Faculty of Science, National University Corporation Shizuoka University
(2)
CREST Research Project, Japan Science and Technology Corporation
(3)
Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, National Institute for Basic Biology

References

  1. Coux O, Tanaka K, Goldberg AL: Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996, 65: 801-847. 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.004101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Glotzer M, Murray AW, Kirschner MW: Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature. 1991, 349: 132-138. 10.1038/349132a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nishizawa M, Furuno N, Okazaki K, Tanaka H, Ogawa Y, Sagata N: Degradation of Mos by the N-terminal proline (Pro2)-dependent ubiquitin pathway on fertilization of Xenopus eggs: possible significance of natural selection for Pro2 in Mos. Embo J. 1993, 12: 4021-4027.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pagano M, Tam SW, Theodoras AM, Beer-Romero P, Del Sal G, Chau V, Yew PR, Draetta GF, Rolfe M: Role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in regulating abundance of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27. Science. 1995, 269: 682-685.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Groll M, Ditzel L, Lowe J, Stock D, Bochtler M, Bartunik HD, Huber R: Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature. 1997, 386: 463-471. 10.1038/386463a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Tokumoto T, Yamashita M, Tokumoto M, Katsu Y, Horiguchi R, Kajiura H, Nagahama Y: Initiation of cyclin B degradation by the 26S proteasome upon egg activation. J Cell Biol. 1997, 138: 1313-1322. 10.1083/jcb.138.6.1313.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Tokumoto T: Nature and role of proteasomes in maturation of fish oocytes. Int Rev Cytol. 1999, 186: 261-294.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tokumoto M, Horiguchi R, Nagahama Y, Tokumoto T: Identification of the Xenopus 20S proteasome a4 subunit which is modified in the meiotic cell cycle. Gene. 1999, 239: 301-308. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00406-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tokumoto M, Horiguchi R, Nagahama Y, Ishikawa K, Tokumoto T: Two proteins, a goldfish 20S proteasome subunit and the protein interacting with 26S proteasome, change in the meiotic cell cycle. Eur J Biochem. 2000, 267: 97-103. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.00962.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. DeMartino GN, Orth K, McCullough ML, Lee LW, Munn TZ, Moomaw CR, Dawson PA, Slaughter CA: The primary structures of four subunits of the human, high-molecular-weight proteinase, macropain (proteasome), are distinct but homologous. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991, 1079: 29-38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tamura T, Lee DH, Osaka F, Fujiwara T, Shin S, Chung CH, Tanaka K, Ichihara A: Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of cDNAs for five major subunits of human proteasomes (multi-catalytic proteinase complexes). Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991, 1089: 95-102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Haass C, Pesold-Hurt B, Multhaup G, Beyreuther K, Kloetzel PM: The PROS-35 gene encodes the 35 kd protein subunit of Drosophila melanogaster proteasome. Embo J. 1989, 8: 2373-2379.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zaiss D, Belote JM: Molecular cloning of the Drosophila melanogaster gene alpha5_dm encoding a 20S proteasome alpha-type subunit. Gene. 1997, 201: 99-105. 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00432-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fujiwara T, Tanaka K, Orino E, Yoshimura T, Kumatori A, Tamura T, Chung CH, Nakai T, Yamaguchi K, Shin S: Proteasomes are essential for yeast proliferation. cDNA cloning and gene disruption of two major subunits. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265: 16604-16613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Georgatsou E, Georgakopoulos T, Thireos G: Molecular cloning of an essential yeast gene encoding a proteasomal subunit. FEBS Lett. 1992, 299: 39-43. 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80095-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Heinemeyer W, Trondle N, Albrecht G, Wolf DH: PRE5 and PRE6, the last missing genes encoding 20S proteasome subunits from yeast? Indication for a set of 14 different subunits in the eukaryotic proteasome core. Biochemistry. 1994, 33: 12229-12237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Falquet L, Pagni M, Bucher P, Hulo N, Sigrist CJ, Hofmann K, Bairoch A: The PROSITE database, its status in 2002. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: 235-238. 10.1093/nar/30.1.235.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tokumoto T, Yamashita M, Yoshikuni M, Kajiura H, Nagahama Y: Purification of latent proteasome (20S proteasome) and demonstration of active proteasome in goldfish (Carassius auratus) oocyte cytosol. Biomed Res. 1995, 16: 173-186.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Claverol S, Burlet-Schiltz O, Girbal-Neuhauser E, Gairin JE, Monsarrat B: Mapping and structural dissection of human 20 S proteasome using proteomic approaches. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002, 1: 567-578. 10.1074/mcp.M200030-MCP200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Iwafune Y, Kawasaki H, Hirano H: Electrophoretic analysis of phosphorylation of the yeast 20S proteasome. Electrophoresis. 2002, 23: 329-338. 10.1002/1522-2683(200202)23:2<329::AID-ELPS329>3.0.CO;2-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferrell K, Wilkinson CR, Dubiel W, Gordon C: Regulatory subunit interactions of the 26S proteasome, a complex problem. Trends Biochem Sci. 2000, 25: 83-88. 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01529-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Haass C, Kloetzel PM: The Drosophila proteasome undergoes changes in its subunit pattern during development. Exp Cell Res. 1989, 180: 243-252. 10.1016/0014-4827(89)90228-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ahn JY, Hong SO, Kwak KB, Kang SS, Tanaka K, Ichihara A, Ha DB, Chung CH: Developmental regulation of proteolytic activities and subunit pattern of 20 S proteasome in chick embryonic muscle. J Biol Chem. 1991, 266: 15746-15749.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pereira ME, Wilk S: Phosphorylation of the multicatalytic proteinase complex from bovine pituitaries by a copurifying cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1990, 283: 68-74. 10.1016/0003-9861(90)90613-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Castano JG, Mahillo E, Arizti P, Arribas J: Phosphorylation of C8 and C9 subunits of the multicatalytic proteinase by casein kinase II and identification of the C8 phosphorylation sites by direct mutagenesis. Biochemistry. 1996, 35: 3782-3789. 10.1021/bi952540s.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Umeda M, Manabe Y, Uchimiya H: Phosphorylation of the C2 subunit of the proteasome in rice (Oryza sativa L.). FEBS Lett. 1997, 403: 313-317. 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)00073-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mason GG, Hendil KB, Rivett AJ: Phosphorylation of proteasomes in mammalian cells. Identification of two phosphorylated subunits and the effect of phosphorylation on activity. Eur J Biochem. 1996, 238: 453-462. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0453z.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mason GG, Murray RZ, Pappin D, Rivett AJ: Phosphorylation of ATPase subunits of the 26S proteasome. FEBS Lett. 1998, 430: 269-274. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00676-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Horiguchi R, Tokumoto M, Yoshiura Y, K. A, Nagahama Y, Tokumoto T: Molecular cloning of cDNA encoding a 20S proteasome a2 subunit from goldfish (Carassius auratus) and its expression analysis. Zoolog Sci. 1998, 15: 773-777.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Grieco D, Porcellini A, Avvedimento EV, Gottesman ME: Requirement for cAMP-PKA pathway activation by M phase-promoting factor in the transition from mitosis to interphase. Science. 1996, 271: 1718-1723.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lorca T, Cruzalegui FH, Fesquet D, Cavadore JC, Mery J, Means A, Doree M: Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II mediates inactivation of MPF and CSF upon fertilization of Xenopus eggs. Nature. 1993, 366: 270-273. 10.1038/366270a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Horiguchi R, Yoshikuni M, Tokumoto M, Nagahama Y, Tokumoto T: Identification of a protein kinase which phosphorylates a subunit of the 26S proteasome and changes in its activity during meiotic cell cycle in goldfish oocytes. Cell Signal. 2005, 17: 205-215. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2004.07.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ma J, Katz E, Belote JM: Expression of proteasome subunit isoforms during spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Mol Biol. 2002, 11: 627-639. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2002.00374.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Shibahara T, Kawasaki H, Hirano H: Mass spectrometric analysis of expression of ATPase subunits encoded by duplicated genes in the 19S regulatory particle of rice 26S proteasome. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2004, 421: 34-41. 10.1016/j.abb.2003.10.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang P, Fu H, Walker J, Papa CM, Smalle J, Ju YM, Vierstra RD: Purification of the Arabidopsis 26 S proteasome: biochemical and molecular analyses revealed the presence of multiple isoforms. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 6401-6413. 10.1074/jbc.M311977200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Akiyama K, Yokota K, Kagawa S, Shimbara N, Tamura T, Akioka H, Nothwang HG, Noda C, Tanaka K, Ichihara A: cDNA cloning and interferon gamma down-regulation of proteasomal subunits X and Y. Science. 1994, 265: 1231-1234.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tokumoto T, Ishikawa K: Characterization of active proteasome (26S proteasome) from Xenopus oocytes. Biomed Res. 1995, 16: 295-302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227: 680-685.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. O'Farrell PZ, Goodman HM, O'Farrell PH: High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of basic as well as acidic proteins. Cell. 1977, 12: 1133-1141. 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90176-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tokumoto T, Kondo A, Miwa J, Horiguchi R, Tokumoto M, Nagahama Y, Okida N, Ishikawa K: Regulated interaction between polypeptide chain elongation factor-1 complex with the 26S proteasome during Xenopus oocyte maturation. BMC Biochem. 2003, 4: 6-10.1186/1471-2091-4-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wakata et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.