Open Access

Soybean peroxidase-mediated degradation of an azo dye– a detailed mechanistic study

  • Liaquat Ali2,
  • Rowdha Algaithi2,
  • Hosam M Habib1,
  • Usama Souka1,
  • Muhammad A Rauf2 and
  • S Salman Ashraf2Email author
BMC Biochemistry201314:35

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2091-14-35

Received: 27 July 2013

Accepted: 28 November 2013

Published: 5 December 2013

Abstract

Background

Peroxidases are emerging as an important class of enzymes that can be used for the efficient degradation of organic pollutants. However, detailed studies identifying the various intermediates produced and the mechanisms involved in the enzyme-mediated pollutant degradation are not widely published.

Results

In the present study, the enzymatic degradation of an azo dye (Crystal Ponceau 6R, CP6R) was studied using commercially available soybean peroxidase (SBP) enzyme. Several operational parameters affecting the enzymatic degradation of dye were evaluated and optimized, such as initial dye concentration, H2O2 dosage, mediator amount and pH of the solution. Under optimized conditions, 40 ppm dye solution could be completely degraded in under one minute by SBP in the presence of H2O2 and a redox mediator. Dye degradation was also confirmed using HPLC and TOC analyses, which showed that most of the dye was being mineralized to CO2 in the process.

Conclusions

Detailed analysis of metabolites, based on LC/MS results, showed that the enzyme-based degradation of the CP6R dye proceeded in two different reaction pathways- via symmetric azo bond cleavage as well as asymmetric azo bond breakage in the dye molecule. In addition, various critical transformative and oxidative steps such as deamination, desulfonation, keto-oxidation are explained on an electronic level. Furthermore, LC/MS/MS analyses confirmed that the end products in both pathways were small chain aliphatic carboxylic acids.

Keywords

Azo dye Degradation Enzyme Mediator LC/MS Metabolites

Background

Extensive use of synthetic dyes and their subsequent release in industrial wastewater is a growing environmental problem[1]. It is estimated that as much as 12% of the dyestuff amounting to about 280,000 ton/ year is released to the ecosystem[2]. These dyes are used in various industrial applications (total consumption is more than one million tons of dyes annually) and are engineered to be generally resistant to fading. They not only need to sustain alkaline or acidic environment but also need to withstand washing with soaps and bleaching agents and be resistant to light and ultraviolet irradiation.

It is well-established that some dyes are potentially carcinogenic and mutagenic, as well as genotoxic[35]. Furthermore, the presence of color in water bodies causes less sunlight to penetrate through water which results in reducing the photosynthetic capability of aquatic plants and microorganisms[6]. Industrial effluents containing dyes are able to color water even in concentrations as low as 1 mg/liter, whereas in most cases, these wastewater streams typically contain a much higher amount of the dye content, about 10-200 mg/liter, which gives intense coloration. It is therefore not surprising that both international and national regulations for industrial wastewater require substantial elimination of the dyestuff content form the effluent[7, 8]. Numerous approaches have been developed to treat industrially generated wastewater, such as coagulation/flocculation, adsorption, use of activated carbon, and various forms of Advanced Oxidation Processes, e.g. ozonation, and photochemical approaches[916]. Most of these methods have a disadvantage of either formation of large amounts of sludge or production of possible toxic byproducts.

Removal of contaminants from the environment by biological methods using enzymes and microorganisms is considered to be closer to nature as it is an environmentally friendlier technique which leaves the ecosystem intact[17]. The technology is scalable and can also be used to treat other organic impurities[18]. A number of microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, and yeasts have been used to treat the dye contaminated wastewaters[1922].

Azo dyes are electron-deficient xenobiotic components because of their azo linkage (–N=N), and in many cases, they have sulphonic (SO3) or other electron-withdrawing groups, which generate an electron deficiency and make the dye less susceptible to degradation by microorganisms. However, under appropriate conditions, they can be degraded by azo reductase-releasing microbes.

Enzyme mediated decolorization is another newer alternative, where the enzyme can specifically react with organic pollutants by transforming them into low molecular weight products[23]. The main advantage of using enzymes in degrading dye solutions is that they have higher reaction rates and can also work in milder reaction conditions. Some azo dyes have been decolorized by using certain peroxidases, such as soybean peroxidase (SBP), manganese peroxidase (MnP), lignin peroxidase (LiP), laccase and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)[2326]. It has been suggested that these enzymatic treatments could oxidize the dye structures to form compounds with lower molecular weight and lower toxicity and may eventually mineralize the dyes.

Although a considerable amount of research has been published on the use of pure enzymes to degrade dyes, detailed analyses of the breakdown pathway are almost non-existent. Structures of the intermediates produced as well as the mechanisms involved in the dye degradation pathway are important to properly understand and further exploit this novel approach to pollutant-contaminated water remediation.

The objective of the present study was to study in detail the mechanism of an azo-dye degradation by soybean peroxidase enzyme (SBP). In addition to identifying the various intermediates produced and proposing possible pathways, factors affecting dye degradation such as initial dye concentration, H2O2 concentration, pH, and presence of redox mediator were also evaluated. The present study is one of the very few studies that show in detail the various intermediates produced during peroxidase-mediated degradation of an azo-dye and possible electron-level mechanisms involved.

Methods

Reagents

The azo dye namely Crystal Ponceau 6R (C.I name = Acid Red 44, C.I number = 16250, Molecular Formula = C20H12N2O7S2Na2, FW = 502.446 g mol−1), herein abbreviated as CP6R was used as a model dye. The dye was procured from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals and used as such. All the other chemicals used in this work were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and were of high purity (< 98%).

Dye degradation studies

Stock solution (2,000 ppm) of the dye was prepared in a 250 mL flask by first dissolving an appropriate amount in deionized water. Further dilutions from this stock were done as per the requirement of the experiment. Unless otherwise indicated, the working concentration of the CP6R dye was 40 ppm. Dye degradation reactions were carried out by adding H2O2 to a buffered dye solution containing SBP enzyme. Spectrophotometric measurements were made using a CARY 50 UV/Vis spectrophotometer. The absorbance value obtained in each case was plotted against time to obtain the % degradation. The % degradation for the dye was calculated by observing the changes in λmax (510 nm) of the solution. The studies were carried out at 25°C otherwise indicated. For pH studies, the dye solution were prepared in 33.33 mM universal buffers (citrate-phosphate) adjusted to specific pH value.

The absorption spectrum of an aqueous solution of Crystal Ponceau 6R (CP6R) was scanned in the range of 200-800 nm with a λmax value appearing at 510 nm. The change in intensity of the λmax value was used to calculate the percentage dye remaining as well as the percentage change of dye degradation as follows:
% dye remaining = At / Ao × 100
(1)
% degradation = Ao At / Ao × 100
(2)

Where A 0 is the initial absorbance of dye solution and A t is the absorbance of the dye solution at any given time.

Total Organic Carbon (TOC) analyses

TOC analyses were carried out using GE Sievers InnoVox TOC analyzer properly calibrated with fresh standards. The CP6R samples tested were 0% degradation sample which consisted of 400 ppm CP6R in 33 mM citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 4, 0.78 μM SBP, 0.1 mM HOBT and 100% degradation sample which was exactly the same as the 0% sample but contained 1 mM H2O2. Analyses were carried out in triplicates and the data is presented as TOC values normalized to 0% CP6R degradation sample.

HPLC and LC/MS experiments

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and LC/MS analyses were carried out similar to as previously described[14]. Briefly, samples were analyzed on an Acquity UPLC system, (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) with an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column with 1.7 μm particle size (2.1 mm I.D. × 100 mm length, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) maintained at 35°C, coupled to Acquity tunable ultraviolet/visible detector (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) and an Acquity Tandem quadruple mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The mobile phase consisted of solution A (0.1 M ammonium formate (pH 6.7)) and solution B (1:1 acetonitrile/methanol) and a gradient of 0% B to 80% B in 13.80 minutes at the flow rate was 0.2 mL/min was used to obtain the chromatographs. The mass spectrometer was equipped with an electrospray ionization source operated in negative ion mode. The ESI conditions were as follows: capillary voltage: 3.0 kV, Cone voltage 30 V, collision energy 50 V, desolvation gas (Nitrogen at 500 L/Hr), Cone gas (Nitrogen at 2 L/Hr), desolvation temperature was set at 350°C and source temperature was 150°C. The mass range was detected from 50 to 700 m/z. Tandem MS experiment was done using Waters Masslynx V 4.1, wherein Argon gas was used as the collision gas.

Results and discussion

Optimizing the enzymatic dye degradation reaction conditions

As expected, the degradation of dye was found to be very much affected by the initial amount of dye content in solution. Studies carried out at different concentrations of the dye showed the optimum CP6R under our chosen conditions was 40 ppm (data not shown). Optimizations of other parameters are described below:

Requirement of HOBT for SBP-mediated degradation of CP6R

Initial experiments using only SBP and H2O2 showed that unlike other dyes, CP6R was unable to be degraded by SBP/H2O2 alone (data not shown). It is well known that the presence of redox mediators such as 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBT), veratryl alcohol, violuric acid, 2- methoxyphenothiazone, etc. can dramatically increase the rate of dye degradation[2730]. The mechanism involved is well known, wherein, the substrate initially undergoes an one-electron oxidation in the presence of a redox mediator and transforms into a radical cation followed by abstraction of a H-atom from the substrate by the mediator and converting it into a radical, which can then cause the substrate to co-oxidize[30].

Since CP6R could not be degraded by SBP enzyme and H2O2 alone, we decided to include HOBT in the reaction. As can be seen in Figure 1, the presence of HOBT resulted in the dramatic and immediate degradation of the CP6R. In order to determine the optimum concentration of HOBT required for efficient CP6R degradation by SBP/H2O2, a systematic study was carried out by using increasing concentrations of the mediator. As can be seen from Additional file1: Figure S1, the dye showed significant degradation even at the low concentration of HOBT (25 μM), whereas, at higher HOBT concentrations, the dye underwent very rapid degradation. Even though 100 μM showed almost complete dye degradation by 3 minutes, we chose 50 μM HOBT for further experiments, so that we could see the positive effects of optimizing other parameters.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-14-35/MediaObjects/12858_2013_Article_440_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Absolute requirement of a redox mediator (HOBT) for SBP-H 2 O 2 mediated CP6R degradation. Full UV-Vis scans of 1) CP6R (30 ppm in pH 5 buffer) with 0.32 μM SBP, 2) CP6R with 0.32 μM SBP and 0.1 mM H2O2, and 3) CP6R, 0.32 μM SBP, 100 μM H2O2 and with 0.1 mM HOBT (after 1 minute) are shown.

Effect of hydrogen peroxide concentration on dye degradation

Since the peroxidase enzymes use H2O2 as a co-reactant, if the concentration of hydrogen peroxide used is too low, the enzyme activity becomes low; however, a very high peroxide concentration can irreversibly oxidize the enzyme and cause its inactivation[26]. In this regard, experiments were carried out to optimize the H2O2 concentration while keeping the other parameters constant. The results obtained are shown in Additional file2: Figure S2, which showed the optimum H2O2 concentration to be 0.175 mM. Additionally, it can also be seen that at very high H2O2 concentrations, a significant reduction in dye degradation is observed (due to H2O2-mediated inactivation of SBP).

Effect of SBP enzyme concentration on dye degradation

Degradation of dye depends on the amount of catalyst added and the contact time. Thus experiments were also done to optimize the concentration of the enzyme in dye solution which was varied in the range of 0 to 2.7 μM while keeping the other parameters constant. The results are shown in Additional file3: Figure S3 and it can be noted that the enzyme dose had a significant effect on dye decoloration. At lower SBP concentrations, the dye degradation was not very significant, whereas at very high SBP concentration, the dye degraded very quickly in a very short time (almost 30% in a few seconds). Based on these data, an optimized concentration of 0.27 μM SBP was chosen for all subsequent reactions.

Effect of pH

Enzymatic driven reactions are known to be pH dependent[28, 29]. Thus experiments were done to optimize this parameter as well. SBP mediated dye degradation was studied at different pH values (from 2 to 9), while keeping the other conditions constant. The results are shown in Additional file4: Figure S4, which shows the dramatic effect of pH on SBP-mediated degradation of CP6R, with the enzyme being most active in the pH 3-5 range. A pH value of 5 was used for all the subsequent experiments. This role of pH on the peroxidase driven reactions has been reported in the literature for different dye degradation along-with its mechanism[17, 23].

Total Organic Carbon analysis

In order to confirm that in fact dye degradation was going on and that some of the CP6R was being mineralized to CO2, we carried out Total Organic Carbon (TOC) analyses on the pure CP6R dye (in the presence of buffer, HOBT and SBP) as well as a CP6R sample that was 100% degraded based on UV-Vis measurements. As can be seen from Figure 2, there was a significant decrease in TOC (64.5% decrease) in the100% degraded sample, thus confirming mineralization of most of the CP6R during the SBP-mediated remediation of this azo dye. Similar decrease in TOC values upon peroxidase treatment have been reported by other groups as well[27].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-14-35/MediaObjects/12858_2013_Article_440_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Normalized Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in “0% CP6R degradation” and “100% CP6R degradation” samples, showing the decrease in TOC upon dye decoloration.

Analysis of product formation using HPLC/MS

Studies related to the degradation pathway and product identification of the enzymatically driven reactions is of special interest to many researchers working in the area of environmental sciences. Literature survey revealed that several studies have been carried out to determine the mechanism for azo dye degradation[31, 32]. However, all of these studies lack detailed electronic-level mechanisms involved in these processes. In order to confirm the degradation of the dye and analyze the product formation, SBP-mediated degradation of CP6R was monitored by Reverse Phase HPLC Diode Array Detector (RP-HPLC-DAD) analysis. The chromatograms of the untreated and treated dye samples are shown in Figure 3. As can be seen from the figure, 20% dye degraded sample showed the breakdown of CP6R into new compounds (new peaks). This was more markedly seen with almost 100% dye degradation sample where the initially formed products were further converted into secondary products. The identity of the breakdown products were confirmed using LC/MS/MS, which are discussed later in this paper.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-14-35/MediaObjects/12858_2013_Article_440_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Reverse Phase HPLC chromatograms of SBP-mediated degradation of CP6R. The sample labeled “0% degradation” contained CP6R dye, HOBT and SBP (but no H2O2).

Proposed mechanism of enzymatic degradation

The basic scheme of peroxidase-mediated degradation of organic compounds is well established as shown below[30, 33]:
Fe III SBP + H 2 O 2 Fe IV = O SB P + H 2 O
Fe IV = O SB P + HOBT Compound I Fe IV = O SB P + HOBT Compound II
Fe IV = O SBP + HOBT Compound II Fe III SBP + H OBT + H 2 O
H OBT + CP 6 R HOBT + C P 6 R

The generation of CP6R radical by SBP in the presence of a mediator (HOBT) consists of four major steps. In the first step, SBP enzyme reacts with H2O2 to become an oxyl-ferric (Fe4+) cation radical, compound I (via loss of two electrons). The second step involves the abstraction of hydrogen from HOBT resulting in the formation of HOBT radical and compound II. In the third step, a second radical of HOBT is formed by the transfer of another hydrogen to compound II, leading to the regeneration of the original reduced (Fe3+) SBP enzyme and a water molecule. In the final step, HOBT radical attacks CP6R and abstracts a hydrogen, resulting in the formation of CP6R radical. Similar reactions have been previously well-documented[33].

Proposed mechanistic pathway of CP6R degradation by SBP-H2O2

Previous studies on the mechanism of azo dyes degradation have shown two main routes for dye degradation, namely the symmetrical azo bond cleavage, and the asymmetrical azo bond cleavage, both of which can take place at the same time[14, 34]. In our present work, we used MS/MS experiments to analyse the various intermediates of CP6R degradation by SBP. The mass of all intermediates observed in the present study are listed in Tables 1 and2. Detailed analyses (discussed below) indicate that both symmetric and asymmetric azo bond cleavage were involved in SBP-mediated CP6R degradation.
Table 1

Mass of all intermediate in asymmetrical degradation

Compound name

Mass (m/z)

IUPAC name

CP6R

457

 

A1

317.9

7,8-dihydro-7,8-dixonaphthalene-1,3disulfonic acid.

A2

351.9

2-carboxyvinyl -4,6disulfobenzonic acid.

A3

104.0

Malonic acid.

A4

156.0

3-methylhexa 2,4-diene dionic acid.

B1

155.0

2-(naphthalene-1-yl) diazene.

B2

144.0

Naphthalen-1-ol.

B3

162.0

4-phenyibut-3enoic acid.

Table 2

Mass of all intermediate in symmetrical degradation

Compound name

Mass (m/z)

IUPAC name

CP6R

457

 

C1

318.9

8-amino-7-hydroxynathphalene-1,3-disulfonic acid.

A1

317.9

7,8-dihydro-7,8-dixonaphthalene-1,3disulfonic acid.

A2

351.9

2-carboxyvinyl -4,6disulfobenzonic acid.

A3

104.0

Malonic acid.

A4

156.0

3-methylhexa 2,4-diene dionic acid.

D1

143.0

Naphthalene-1-amine.

B2

144.0

Naphthalen-1-ol.

B3

162.0

4-phenyibut-3enoic acid.

Asymmetrical azo bond cleavage of CP6R

Figure 4 summarizes the asymmetrical azo bond cleavage of CP6R by SBP. Breakage of the azo bond in CP6R may proceed via two mechanistic pathways. The first one involves the C-N bond cleavage on the side that has un-substituted naphthalene. In the present study, no evidence (MS fragment) of this type of asymmetricazo bond cleavage was observed. It seems that SBP enzyme mediates the asymmetrical cleavage of the C-N bond which is closer to the substituted naphthalene. CP6R is initially broken into two main species, namely (A1) (7,8-dihydro-7,8-dixonaphthalene-1,3disulfonic acid) and (B1) (2-(naphthalene-1-yl) diazene). The intermediate (A1), containing sulfonate group will stabilize the benzene ring more as compared to the un-substituted benzene ring. This is due to the electron withdrawing nature of the sulfonate group resulting in the stability of the intermediate as previously reported in the literature[35]. The other side of the intermediate (A1) containing the diketone makes the structure rigid, as a result of which the stability of the intermediate increases. Product (A1) is spontaneously converted to (A2) (2-carboxyvinyl-4,6 disulfobenzonic acid), which is formed by the conversion of keto groups to carboxylic groups. Such enzymatic transformation with ring opening has also been previously reported[36]. Further degradation of (A2) is proposed to produce low molecular weight carboxylic acids, (A3) (3-methylhexa-2,4-dienedioic acid) and (A4) (malonic acid). The azo group of intermediate (B1) can also be radically transformed to an alcohol group to produce (B2) (Naphthalen-1-ol), as has been previously reported in the literature[36]. The intermediate (B1) is stabilized due to resonance in naphthalene, but it is less stable as compared to the other intermediate (B2), because the presence of azo group in B1 will acquire further stability after losing the nitrogen atoms as N2 molecule, which results in B2. The species (B2) can then subsequently undergo ring opening to produce a carboxylic acid (B3) (4-phenyibut-3enoic acid).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-14-35/MediaObjects/12858_2013_Article_440_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Proposed mechanism for the asymmetrical azo bond cleavage of CP6R by SBP enzyme.

Symmetrical azo bond cleavage of CP6R

Figure 5 summarizes the symmetrical azo bond cleavage of CP6R by SBP. As it can be seen from this scheme, CP6R symmetrical bond cleavage takes place at -N=N- site resulting in two main products namely (C1) (8-amino-7-hydroxynathphalene-1,3-disulfonic acid) and (D1) (2-(naphthalene-1-amine). Intermediates (D1) and (C1) both undergo the same transformation as in asymmetrical cleavage (Figure 4) to produce (B2) (Naphthalen-1-ol) and (A1) (7,8-dihydro-7,8-dixonaphthalene-1,3disulfonic acid), respectively.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-14-35/MediaObjects/12858_2013_Article_440_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Proposed mechanism for the symmetrical azo bond cleavage of CP6R by SBP enzyme.

Detailed electronic-level mechanism of asymmetrical cleavage of the azo bond

Figure 6 shows a proposed detailed electronic-level mechanism for the asymmetric azo bond cleavage, which starts with the formation of CP6R radical by abstraction of a hydrogen. Soybean peroxidase prefers the abstraction of hydrogen from hydroxyl group rather than sulphur group, because oxygen is more electronegative than sulfur[37]. Thereafter, the radical shifts to the carbon which is attached to the nitrogen, resulting in the formation of a ketone. This leads to the breakdown of the π bond and the conjugation of the azo group, thus making it less stable. The OH radical attack on the carbon atom attached to the nitrogen results in the detachment of the azo group and the formation of diketo intermediate (A1) and -N=N-aryl intermediate (B1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-14-35/MediaObjects/12858_2013_Article_440_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Proposed mechanism for the asymmetrical azo bond cleavage of CP6R by SBP enzyme and subsequent conversion to a diketo intermediate (A1).

Oxidation of diketo

The oxidation of diketo to carboxylic acid has been observed in several photolytic degradation studies[38]. The ring is initially opened by the attack of OH radical on alpha diketones resulting in the formation of dicarboxilic acid intermediate (A2). This is shown in the Additional file5: Figure S5.

Desulfonation reaction

During the degradation of CP6R molecule, desulfonation of the two aryl sulfonic groups occurs readily from the (A2) intermediate of the dye. Due to the extended orbitals of sulfur atom, the OH radical preferentially attacks this atom, resulting in the eventual cleavage of the C-S bond of the sulfonic group[3840]. Furthermore, the second sulfur atoms in A2 can be attacked by another OH radical simultaneously resulting in the removal of both of the –SO3H groups and the formation of radical species. This is followed by subsequent oxidation steps and resulting in low molecular weight carboxylic acid molecules (A3 and A4) (Figure 7).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-14-35/MediaObjects/12858_2013_Article_440_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Proposed mechanism for the desulfonation of intermediate A2 to small molecular weight carboxylic acids A3 and A4.

Deamination and removal of azo group

Symmetrical degradation of CP6R produces phenyl diazene intermediate (B1). The OH radical abstracts hydrogen from nitrogen, followed by radical shift to the nitrogen resulting in the formation of phenol by releasing nitrogen molecule. Similar conversion has been observed for Methyl Orange dye[32]. The asymmetrical degradation shows aromatic amine intermediate (D1), which is different than what is produced during symmetrical degradation. The aqueous media of CP6R dye solution provides the protonated hydrogen to form NH3+, after which the OH radical attacks on carbon containing NH3+ results in the formation of a phenol[41]. This scheme is shown in Figure 8.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-14-35/MediaObjects/12858_2013_Article_440_Fig8_HTML.jpg
Figure 8

Proposed mechanism for the deamination of intermediate D1 and the subsequent removal of the azo group of intermediate B1 to produce a phenol.

Oxidation of phenol

As shown in Figure 9, degradation of intermediate phenol (B2) can take place by the abstraction of hydrogen radical from the phenolic group of B2, resulting in the formation of radical on oxygen. This is followed by the formation of ketone which is further oxidized to carboxylic acid (B3).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-14-35/MediaObjects/12858_2013_Article_440_Fig9_HTML.jpg
Figure 9

Proposed mechanism for the oxidation of intermediate B2 to a carboxylic acid B3.

Formation of amine in symmetrical cleavage

The OH radical prefers to attach on the nitrogen of azo group because of double bond. Several studies have reported that the cleavage of N=N group can produce amine and ketoamine[14, 42]. During symmetrical degradation of CP6R, (C1) and (D1) intermediates are formed as shown in Figure 10. The formation of amine on substituted naphthalene (C1) is due to the attack of hydrogen radical. In the case of intermediate (D1), the formation of amine can occur via a couple of different ways. One of the approaches is the conversion of the unsubstituted napthalene into nitrosonaphthalene which has been previously reported[14], which then is converted into ketoamide, and can then abstract hydrogen (or H radical) and form D1. Alternatively, nitrosonaphthalene may form D1 directly (without going through the ketoamide intermediate)[42]. The other possibility is the conversion of the unsubstituted naphthalene directly to ketoamide, which then is converted into D1.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-14-35/MediaObjects/12858_2013_Article_440_Fig10_HTML.jpg
Figure 10

Proposed mechanisms for the symmetrical azo bond cleavage and generation of intermediates C1 and D1.

De-amination in symmetrical cleavage

Enzymatic degradation of CP6R produces the amine intermediate (C1). The oxidation of un-substituted aromatic amine is difficult as compared to substituted aromatic amine. In CP6R, aromatic amine intermediate is formed containing the phenol group at the ortho position. This aminophenol undergoes a keto-enol equilibrium. As shown in Figure 11, the OH radical then abstracts acidic alpha hydrogen of the tautomer, resulting in the formation of ketoamine, which is further hydrolyzed to diketo. Such de-amination has been reported in photolytic degradation of Amido Black and RB[14].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-14-35/MediaObjects/12858_2013_Article_440_Fig11_HTML.jpg
Figure 11

Proposed mechanism for the enzymatic deamination of intermediate C1 to eventually generate the diketo intermediate A1.

Conclusion

In summary, we show here efficient degradation of an azo-dye, Crystal Ponceau 6R (CP6R), using the Soybean peroxidase/HOBT/H2O2 system. Under optimized conditions it was found that SBP could degrade 100% of the dye in under a minute. Dye mineralization was confirmed using TOC and HPLC experiment, and most importantly, extensive LC/MS/MS experiments were used to identify the various metabolites formed during the degradation process. Lastly, based on the LC/MS data and known radical-based reactions, we were able to develop detailed mechanisms for the various steps in the dye degradation. Our results show that the azo dye degraded via two different pathways, namely symmetric and asymmetricazo bond cleavage followed by diketo oxidation to carboxylic acids, desulfonation, deamination, and phenolic oxidation reactions.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by UAEU/NRF Research Grant Program 27/11/2 (21S039 & 31S072) to SSA and MAR.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Food and Agriculture, UAE University
(2)
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, UAE University

References

  1. Forgacs E, Cserhati T, Oros G: Removal of synthetic dyes from wastewaters: A review. Environ Intl. 2004, 30: 953-971. 10.1016/j.envint.2004.02.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Jin X, Liu G, Xu Z, Yao W: Decolorization of a dye industry effluent by Aspergillusfumigatus XC6. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007, 74: 239-243. 10.1007/s00253-006-0658-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sarıkaya R, Selvi M, Erkoc F: Evaluation of potential genotoxicity of five food dyes using the somatic mutation and recombination test. Chemosphere. 2012, 88: 974-979. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. De Lima ROA, Bazo AP, Salvadori DMF, Rech CM, Oliveira DP, Umbuzeiro GP: Mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of a textile azo dye processing plant effluent that impacts a drinking water source. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2007, 626: 53-60. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.08.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Satuf ML, Pierrestegui MJ, Rossini L, Brandi RJ, Alfano OM: Kinetic modeling of azo dyesphotocatalytic degradation in aqueous TiO2 suspensions. Toxicity and biodegradability evaluation. Catal Today. 2011, 161: 121-126. 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.11.018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Robinson T, McMullan G, Marchant R, Nigam P: Remediation of dyes in textile effluent: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative. Bio Resour Technol. 2004, 77: 247-255.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Hessel C, Allegre C, Maisseu M, Charbit F, Moulin P: Guidelines and legislation for dye house effluents. J Environ Manag. 2007, 83: 171-180. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Griffiths C, Klemick H, Massey M, Moore C, Newbold S, Simpson D, Walsh P, Wheeler W: US Environmental Protection Agency valuation of surface water quality improvements. Rev Environ Econ Policy. 2012, 6: 130-146. 10.1093/reep/rer025.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wu C, Wang Y, Gao B, Zhao Y, Yue Q: Coagulation performance and floccharacteristics of aluminum sulfate using sodium alginate as coagulant aid for synthetic dying wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol. 2012, 95: 180-187.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen T, Gao BY, Yue QY: Effect of dosing method and pH on color removal performance and floc aggregation of polyferric chloride–polyamine dualcoagulant in synthetic dyeing wastewater treatment. Colloids Surf A. 2010, 355: 121-129. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.12.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Alnuaimi MM, Rauf MA, Ashraf SS: A comparative study of Neutral Red decoloration by photo-Fenton and photocatalytic processes. Dyes Pigm. 2008, 76: 332-337. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.08.051.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Mezohegyi G, Van der Zee FP, Font J, Fortuny A, Fabregat A: Towards advanced aqueous dye removal processes: A short review on the versatile role of activated carbon. J Environ Manage. 2012, 102: 148-164.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao M, Zeng Z, Sun B, Zou H, Chen J, Shao L: Ozonation of azo dye Acid Red 14 in a microporous tube-in-tube microchannel reactor: Decolorization and mechanism. Chemosphere. 2012, 89: 190-197. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Meetani MA, Hisaindee SM, Abdullah F, Ashraf SS, Rauf MA: Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analysis of photodegradation of a diazo compound: A mechanistic study. Chemosphere. 2010, 80: 422-427. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.04.065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rauf MA, Meetani MA, Hisaindee S: An overview on the photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in the presence of TiO2 doped with selective transition metals. Desal. 2011, 276: 13-27. 10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.071.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalsoom U, Ashraf SS, Meetani MA, Rauf MA, Bhatti HN: Degradation and kinetics of H2O2 assisted photochemical oxidation of Remazol Turquoise Blue. Chem Eng J. 2012, 200–202: 373-379.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Rauf MA, Ashraf SS: Survey of recent trends in biochemically assisted degradation of dyes. Chem Eng J. 2012, 209: 520-530.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Saratale RG, Saratale GD, Chang JS, Govindwar SP: Bacterial decolorizationand degradation of azo dyes: A review. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2011, 42: 138-157. 10.1016/j.jtice.2010.06.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Bibi I, Bhatti HN, Asgher M: Comparative study of natural and synthetic phenolic compounds as efficient laccase mediators for transformation of cationic dye. Biochem Eng J. 2011, 56: 225-231. 10.1016/j.bej.2011.07.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ateeq H, Rauf MA, Ashraf SS: Efficient microbial degradation of Toluidine Blue dye by Brevibacilus sp. Dyes Pigm. 2007, 75: 395-400. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.06.019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ali NF, El-Mohamedy RSR: Microbial decoloration of textile waste water. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2012, 16: 117-123. 10.1016/j.jscs.2010.11.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Martorell MM, Pajot HF, De Figueroa LIC: Dye-decolourizing yeasts isolated from Las Yungas rainforest. Dye assimilation and removal used as selection criteria. Inter Biodet Biodegrad. 2012, 66: 25-32. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.10.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kalsoom U, Ashraf SS, Meetani MA, Rauf MA, Bhatti HN: Mechanistic study of a diazo dye degradation by soybean peroxidase. Chem Cent J. 2013, 7: 1-10. 10.1186/1752-153X-7-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Cheng XB, Jia R, Li PS, Tu SQ, Zhu Q, Tang WZ, Li XD: Studies on the properties and co-immobilization of manganese peroxidase. Enzy Microb Technol. 2007, 41: 258-264. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.01.020.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Franciscon E, Piubeli F, Garboggini FF, De Menezes CR, Silva IS, Paulo AC, Grossman MJ, Durrant LR: Polymerization study of the aromatic amines generated by the biodegradation of azo dyes using the laccase enzyme. Enzy Microb Technol. 2010, 46: 360-365. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2009.12.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ryan BJ, Carolan N, Fagain CO: Horseradish and soybean peroxidases: Comparable tools for alternative niches. Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24: 355-363. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.06.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Matto M, Husain Q: Decolonization of direct dyes by salt fractionated turnip proteins enhanced in the presence of hydrogen peroxide and redox mediators. Chemosphere. 2007, 69: 338-345. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.03.069.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jamal F, Qidwai T, Pandey PK, Singh D: Catalytic potential of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea) bud peroxidase in decolorization of synthetic recalcitrant dyes using redox mediator. Catal Commun. 2011, 15: 93-98. 10.1016/j.catcom.2011.08.020.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Khlifi R, Belbahri L, Woodward S, Ellouz M, Dhouib A, Sayadi S, Mechichi T: Decoloration and detoxification of textile industry wastewaterby the laccase-mediator system. J Hazard Mater. 2010, 175: 802-808. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.079.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fabbrini M, Galli C, Gentili P: Comparing the catalytic efficiency of some mediators of laccase. J Mol Catal B. 2002, 16: 231-240. 10.1016/S1381-1177(01)00067-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Pereira L, Coelho AV, Viegas CA, Dos Santos MMC, Robalo MP, Martins LO: Enzymatic biotransformation of the azo dye sudan orange G with bacterial CotA-laccase. J Biotech. 2009, 139: 68-77. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.09.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Chen T, Zheng Y, Lin J, Chen G: Study on the photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange in water using Ag/ZnO as catalyst by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization ion-trap mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2008, 19: 997-1003. 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.03.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dunford H: Horseradish peroxidase. II. Two-electron reactions, ferrous peroxidase, compound III, the five oxidation states, oxygen evolution and inactivation. Peroxidases and catalases: Biochemistry, biophysics, biotechnology, and physiology. Edited by: Dunford HB. 2010, New Jersey: Wiley, 41-57. 2Google Scholar
  34. Ozen AS, Aviyente V, Proft FD, Geerling P: Modeling the substituent effect on the oxidative degradation of azodyes. J Phys Chem A. 2004, 108: 5990-6000. 10.1021/jp037138z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Rose PE, Johnson SD, Kilbourn PM: Tracer testing at Dixie Valley, Nevada, using 2-naphthalene sulfonate and 2,7-naphthalene disulfonate. Proceedings 26th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. 2001, Stanford, California: Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  36. Lopez C, Valade AG, Combourieuc B, Mielgo I, Bouchon B, Lema JM: Mechanism of enzymatic degradation of the azo dyes orange II determine by ex situ 1H nuclear magnetic resonance and electrospray ionization-ion trap mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem. 2004, 335: 135-149. 10.1016/j.ab.2004.08.037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Chacko JT, Subramaniam K: Enzymatic degradation of Azo dyes-A review. Int J Env Sci. 2011, 1: 1250-1260.Google Scholar
  38. Hisaindee S, Meetani MA, Rauf MA: Application of LC-MS to the analysis of advanced oxidation process (AOP) degradation of dye products and reaction mechanisms. Trends Anal Chem. 2013, 49: 31-44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Bansal P, Singh D, Sud D: Photocatalytic degradation of azo dye in aqueous TiO2 suspension: Reaction pathway and identification of intermediates products by LC/MS. Sep Purif Techn. 2010, 72: 357-365. 10.1016/j.seppur.2010.03.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Cai M, Jin M, Weavers LK: Analysis of sonolytic degradation products of azo dye Orange G using liquid chromatography–diode array detection-mass spectrometry. Ultrasonics Sonochem. 2011, 18: 1068-1076. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.03.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Brillas E, Mul E, Sauleda R, Sanchez L, Peral J, Domenech X, Casado J: Aniline mineralization by AOP’s: anodic oxidation, photocatalytic, electro-Fenton and photoelectron-fenton processes. Appl Catal B. 1998, 16: 31-42. 10.1016/S0926-3373(97)00059-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang J, Feng M, Jiang Y, Hu M, Li S, Zhai Q: Efficient decolorization/degradation of aqueous azo of dyes using buffered H2O2 oxidation catalyzed by a dosage below ppm level of chloroperoxidase. Chem Eng J. 2012, 191: 236-242.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ali et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.