Open Access

Novel β-N-acetylglucosaminidases from Vibrio harveyi 650: Cloning, expression, enzymatic properties, and subsite identification

  • Wipa Suginta1Email author,
  • Duangkamon Chuenark1,
  • Mamiko Mizuhara2 and
  • Tamo Fukamizo2
BMC Biochemistry201011:40

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2091-11-40

Received: 4 May 2010

Accepted: 29 September 2010

Published: 29 September 2010

Abstract

Background

Since chitin is a highly abundant natural biopolymer, many attempts have been made to convert this insoluble polysaccharide into commercially valuable products using chitinases and β-N-acetylglucosaminidases (GlcNAcases). We have previously reported the structure and function of chitinase A from Vibrio harveyi 650. This study t reports the identification of two GlcNAcases from the same organism and their detailed functional characterization.

Results

The genes encoding two new members of family-20 GlcNAcases were isolated from the genome of V. harveyi 650, cloned and expressed at a high level in E. coli. Vh Nag1 has a molecular mass of 89 kDa and an optimum pH of 7.5, whereas Vh Nag2 has a molecular mass of 73 kDa and an optimum pH of 7.0. The recombinant GlcNAcases were found to hydrolyze all the natural substrates, Vh Nag2 being ten-fold more active than Vh Nag1. Product analysis by TLC and quantitative HPLC suggested that Vh Nag2 degraded chitooligosaccharides in a sequential manner, its highest activity being with chitotetraose. Kinetic modeling of the enzymic reaction revealed that binding at subsites (-2) and (+4) had unfavorable (positive) binding free energy changes and that the binding pocket of Vh Nag2 contains four GlcNAc binding subsites, designated (-1),(+1),(+2), and (+3).

Conclusions

Two novel GlcNAcases were identified as exolytic enzymes that degraded chitin oligosaccharides, releasing GlcNAc as the end product. In living cells, these intracellular enzymes may work after endolytic chitinases to complete chitin degradation. The availability of the two GlcNAcases, together with the previously-reported chitinase A from the same organism, suggests that a systematic development of the chitin-degrading enzymes may provide a valuable tool in commercial chitin bioconversion.

Background

Chitin is a β-1,4-linked homopolymer of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), which is found mainly in the exoskeleton of crustaceans, insects and in the cell walls of fungi. Chitin is one of the most abundant polymers in nature and its degradation derivatives are pharmaceutically valuable. for example, chitoligosaccharides can stimulate the immune system to respond to microbial infections and chitin monomers have been shown to act as anti-aging and anti-tumor agents, as well as to relieve the symptoms of osteoarthritis [16]. Complete degradation of chitin requires chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) and β-N-acetylglucosaminidases (GlcNAcases) or chitobiases (EC 3.2.1.52), so such enzymes could potentially serve as biocatalysts in the production of chitin derivatives of desired sizes during the recycling of chitin biomass.

As well as functioning in chitin degradation by bacteria, GlcNAcases are also known to be key enzymes in the catabolism of glycoconjugates containing N-acetylglucosamine residues [7, 8] and mutations of the gene encoding a human GlcNAcase homologue (HexA) cause a fatal genetic lipid storage disorder, known as Tay-Sachs disease [9]. In the CAZy database (http://www.cazy.org), GlcNAcases are classified into glycosyl hydrolases family 3 (GH-3) or family 20 (GH-20), which differ in sequence and mode of enzyme action [10, 11]. Family-3 GlcNAcases are thought to act by a standard retaining mechanism involving a covalent glycosyl-enzyme intermediate while family-20 enzymes employ a 'substrate-assisted' mechanism involving the transient formation of an oxazolinium ion intermediate [1215]. Most of the GlcNAcases described hitherto belong to the GH-20 family. To date, only five bacterial GH-3 GlcNAcases have been characterized, including NagZ or ExoII from Vibrio furnissii [16], Nag3A from Clostridium paraputrificum M-2 [17], NagA from Streptomyces thermoviolaceus [18], and NagA and CbsA from Thermotoga maritima and T. neapolitana [19].

Vibrio harveyi, formerly known as V. carchariae, is a Gram-negative marine bacterium that causes luminous Vibriosis, a serious disease that affects commercially farmed fish and shellfish species [20, 21]. We previously reported isolation of the gene encoding endochitinase A from Vibrio harveyi type strain 650 for functional and structural characterization [22, 23]. In this study, we employed a homology-based strategy to isolate two GlcNAcase genes from the genome of the same Vibrio strain. Sequence analysis suggested that the resultant polypeptides were new members of the GH-20 family. Enzymic properties of the GlcNAcases expressed in E. coli were investigated. Their kinetic properties and identification of the subsites in the more active enzyme are discussed in further detail.

Results and Discussion

Gene isolation and sequence analysis

The availability of the complete genome sequence allowed us to locate three open reading frames (ORFs), including VIBHAR_03430 (Swiss-Prot: A7MYY8), VIBHAR_06345 (Swiss-Prot: A7N8P3) and, VIBHAR_01265 (Swiss-Prot: A7N1G4) in the genome of V. harveyi type strain ATCC BAA-1116 BB120. These reading frames encode uncharacterized proteins with presumed GlcNAcase activity. In an attempt to isolate the genes that encode GlcNAcases in a closely-related organism, three sets of oligonucleotides were designed based on the above-mentioned ORFs. Two homologous DNAs were amplified by the oligonucleotides designed from the VIBHAR_03430 and VIBHAR_01265 ORFs, whereas the DNA fragment compatible with the VIBHAR_06345 ORF could not be amplified successfully. Hence, the first two DNA fragments (hereafter referred to as VhNag1 and VhNag2) were further cloned and expressed for functional characterization. Nucleotide sequence analysis showed that the Vh Nag1 full-length DNA contains 2,343 bp which encode a polypeptide of 88,849 Da, whereas the Vh Nag2 full-length DNA contains 1,926 bp, encoding a polypeptide of 73,143 Da. The p I values of Vh Nag1 and Vh Nag2 were calculated to be 4.9 and 5.4, respectively. The nucleotide and corresponding amino acid sequences of the newly-identified GlcNACases have been deposited in the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ database with assigned accession numbers of HM175715 for Vh Nag1 and HM175716 for Vh Nag2. Although a BLAST search indicated high sequence similarity of Vh Nag1 and Vh Nag2 to GlcNAcases from other Vibrio species, most of these sequences turned out to be only hypothetical proteins with predicted GlcNAcase activity. Low sequence similarity with all GH-3 members (< 12%) suggested that neither of these enzymes belong to GH-3, but matches of up to 30% with previously studied GH-20 enzymes indicated that they are new GH-20 members. A sequence comparison with eleven functionally-characterized GH-20 enzymes (data not shown) shows that both Vh Nag sequences are closest to the α-chain of human GlcNAcase (HuHexA, 30% similarity) [24], followed by Serratia marcescens chitobiase (Sm Chb, 24%) [25]. Fig. 1 shows a sequence alignment of Vh Nag1 and Vh Nag2 with three selected GlcNAcases, including Vh Chb [26] (the only characterized GlcNAcase from V. harveyi), HuHexA and Sm Chb (which have the highest sequence similarities to the Vh Nag sequences). Since the structural details of Sm Chb are well studied, further sequence comparisons were with Sm Chb. As seen in Fig. 1, a number of consensus residues are identified, a few of which may participate in the catalytic function of the Vibrio GlcNAcases. The most obvious of these are the acidic pairs Asp287-Glu288 (in Vh Nag1) or Asp437-Glu438 (in Vh Nag2) (Fig. 1, red asterisks) as they are completely aligned with Asp539-Glu540 of Sm Chb. These two residues were previously shown to be crucial for the catalytic function of Sm Chb, Glu540 acting as the catalytic residue [13, 25]. Other residues found to be involved in binding the substrate in the enzyme-substrate complex of Sm Chb-diNAG include Asp346, Arg349, Asp378, Asp379, Trp616, Trp685, and Trp737. These residues are completely conserved among the GlcNAcase species (Fig. 1, blue dots).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-11-40/MediaObjects/12858_2010_Article_301_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Amino acid sequence alignment of five GH-20 GlcNAcases. The sequence alignment was generated by CLUSTAL W and displayed by Genedoc. The amino acid sequence of S. marcescens chitobiase: Sm Chb (Swiss-Prot: Q54468) was aligned with the corresponding sequence HuHexA: the α-chain of human hexosaminidase (Swiss-Prot: P06865), V. harveyi chitobiase: Vh Chb (Swiss-Prot: P13670), V. harveyi 650 Vh Nag1(GenBank: HM175715) and Vh Nag2 (GenBank: HM175716). The acidic pair important for enzyme catalysis is marked with red asterisks. The residues responsible for diNAG binding are marked with blue dots. Arrows indicate the first and the last residues in the catalytic domain of Sm Chb.

Recombinant expression and mass identification

The full-length Vh NAg1 and Vh Nag2 DNAs were subsequently cloned into the pQE60 expression vector, which provides high-level expression in E. coli M15 of C-terminally (His)6-tagged polypeptides. The overall yields of the purified recombinant proteins obtained after Ni-NTA affinity chromatography were 5 - 10 mg/ml of bacterial culture. Fig. 2A shows SDS-PAGE analysis, displaying a single band of Vh Nag1 migrating to slightly below the 96 kDa marker and Vh Nag2 closer 66 kDa. The molecular masses estimated from their mobilities are consistent with the theoretical masses of the enzymes (88,849 Da for Vh Nag1 and 73,143 Da for Vh Nag2). In peptide mass fingerprinting, 9 and 13 Vh Nag1 peptides unambiguously matched internal peptides of GlcNAcases from V. angustum and Photobacterium sp, respectively. For Vh Nag2, 20 and 21 peptides were identical with the internal peptides of V. parahaemolyticus and V. alginolyticus GlcNAcases (see additional file 1, Table S1). This peptide mass identification strongly indicates that the proteins expressed in E. coli are GlcNAcases.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-11-40/MediaObjects/12858_2010_Article_301_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Physical properties of V. harveyi GlcNAcases. A) SDS-PAGE analysis of Vh Nag1 and Vh Nag2 expressed in E. coli and purified by Ni-NTA agarose chromatography. Std: low molecular weight protein markers. B) pH/activity profiles of Vh Nag1 and Vh Nag2. GlcNAcase activity was assayed at different pH values from 2.5 to 9.5 at 37°C for 10 min using p NP-GlcNAc as substrate

Assessment of GlcNAcase activity and kinetic studies

Both of the purified GlcNAcases were active against p NP-GlcNAc, but Vh Nag2 was found to be much more active than Vh Nag1. We suspect that the full-length Vh Nag1 is expressed as a pro-enzyme, which requires proteolytic processing to attain its full activity. The hydrolysis of p NP-GlcNAc by Vh Nag1 and Vh Nag2 was determined as a function of time (additional file 2, Fig. S1). Vh Nag2 activity was significantly greater than that of Vh Nag1 over the entire course of reaction. In the reaction progress curves, the activity of both enzymes was constant for up to 15 min, and then began to decrease at longer incubation times. Therefore, the reaction time was set to 10 min to ensure that initial velocities were measured in subsequent kinetic experiments.

The effect of pH on GlcNAcase activity was examined with p NP-GlcNAc as substrate. The pH activity profiles of Vh Nag1 and Vh Nag2 were typical bell-shaped curves as seen for most glycosyl hydrolases. Fig. 2B shows enzymic activity decreasing at low and high pH values. The maximal activity of Vh Nag1 was at pH 7.5 and of Vh Nag2 at pH 7.0. When specific hydrolytic activity was determined with various substrates (Fig. 3), p NP-GlcNAc was found to be the most effective. While Vh Nag2 could hydrolyze all the three p NP-glycosides (although p NP-GlcNAc2 and p NP-Glucose were respectively hydrolyzed 300-fold and 700-fold less efficiently than p NP-GlcNAc), Vh Nag1 was only active with p NP-GlcNAc. Both enzymes could hydrolyze chitooligosaccharides (GlcNAc2-6) and colloidal chitin with Vh Nag2 being at least ten-times more active than Vh Nag1. Of the natural glycosides, chitotetraose was the best substrate and chitotriose the second best. In contrast, chitobiose, chitopentaose and chitohexaose were only fair substrates, and insoluble (colloidal) chitin was the poorest of all (Fig. 3).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-11-40/MediaObjects/12858_2010_Article_301_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Specific hydrolyzing activity of V. harveyi GlcNAcases. The enzymic activity of Vh Nag1 and Vh Nag2 was determined using the colorimetric assay for p NP-glycoside substrates and using the reducing sugar assay for chitooligosaccharides substrates. The reactions were set up as described in the text.

The kinetic parameters of the hydrolytic activity of the two GlcNAcases were further assessed. As shown in Table 1, kcat/Km with p NP-GlcNAc was 11-fold greater for Vh Nag2 than for Vh Nag1. It was noted throughout this study that Vh Nag1 was tended to undergo rapid and progressive loss of GlcNAcase activity. Although several attempts were made to obtain the kinetic values of this higher-M r enzyme, the data acquired with Vh Nag1 could not be evaluated precisely, and we decided not to present it in this study. In accordance with our earlier demonstration (see Fig. 3), Vh Nag2 had the lowest Km and highest kcat, yielding overall kcat/Km of 4,935 M-1s-1 towards p NP-GlcNAc. When natural substrates were compared, Vh Nag2 had the greatest catalytic activity with GlcNAc4 (kcat/Km 304 M-1s-1), followed by GlcNAc3 (228 M-1s-1), GlcNAc5 (181 M-1s-1), GlcNAc6 (166 M-1s-1), and GlcNAc2 (56 M-1s-1). Overall, kcat/Km of Vh Nag2 with p NP-GlcNAc is 88-fold greater than with GlcNAc2 (the poorest glycoside substrate) and 16-fold greater than with GlcNAc4 (the best glycoside substrate). In general, the glycosidic bond of p NP-GlcNAc is more easily cleaved than that of GlcNAc-GlcNAc, because of the higher electron-withdrawing capacity of p-nitrophenyl moiety. However, the rate of hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl glycoside depends on the affinity to the enzyme used. For example, Keyhani & Roseman [27] showed that Vibrio furnssii β-GlcNAcidase (exoI) hydrolyzed p NP-GlcNAc about 5-fold faster than GlcNAc2, but 1.4 fold slower than GlcNAc3-6, whereas Kubota et al. [28] reported that Streptomyces thermoviolacacus NagC could hydrolyze p NP-GlcNAc and GlcNAc2 at equal rates. On the other hand, its activity with the p NP substrate was between 2- to 3.5-fold greater than with GlcNAc3-5.
Table 1

Kinetic parameters of chitin oligosaccharide hydrolysis.

Substrate

Km (μM)

kcat (s -1 )

kcat /Km (M -1 s -1 )

p NP-GlcNAc (Vh Nag1)

172 ± 48a

0.08

465

p NP-GlcNAc(Vh Nag2)

77 ± 17

0.38

4,935

GlcNAc2

179 ± 52

0.01

56

GlcNAc3

441 ± 98

0.10

228

GlcNAc4

329 ± 93

0.10

304

GlcNAc5

496 ± 78

0.09

181

GlcNAc6

421 ± 76

0.07

166

a Results are means ± SD (n = 3 experiments for each substrate).

The initial velocity of the reaction catalyzed by V. harveyi GlcNAcases was measured at 37°C, 10 min with varied concentrations of chitin oligosaccharides from 0-500 μM. The release of products was determined by the reducing sugar assay (see text). The kinetic experiments were carried out in triplicate. The kinetic parameters (Km, kcat, and kcat/Km) were estimated from a non-linear regression function available in GraphPad Prism v.5.0.

Time course of chitin oligosaccharide hydrolysis by TLC and HPLC

Degradation patterns of chitooligosaccharides by Vh Nag2 were analyzed by TLC (Fig. 4). The most significant result obtained from TLC analysis is that Vh Nag2 acted exolytically, yielding GlcNAc as the end product from all chitin oligomers. Additionally, GlcNAc3 and GlcNAc4 were degraded rapidly and almost completely within 10 min (Fig. 4B and 4C), whilst the reaction of GlcNAc5 was not complete until 1 h of incubation (Fig. 4D). The degradation of GlcNAc2 (Fig. 4A) and GlcNAc6 (Fig. 4E) was even slower, complete hydrolysis of these two substrates being attained only after 2 h of incubation.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-11-40/MediaObjects/12858_2010_Article_301_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Time course of chitooligosaccharide hydrolysis by TLC. A reaction mixture (20 μl), containing 800 ng Vh Nag2 and 2.5 mM of A) GlcNAc2; B) GlcNAc3; C) GlcNAc4; D) GlcNAc5; or E) GlcNAc6 in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, was incubated at various times at 37°C, and then analyzed by TLC. Sugar products were detected with aniline-diphenylamine reagent. Lanes: std, a standard mix of GlcNAc1-6; 1-7, incubation at 1, 5, 10, 15, 30 min, 3 h and 18 h, respectively; and 8, substrate control.

The time course of chitin oligosaccharide hydrolysis by Vh Nag2 was further investigated by quantitative HPLC. Fig. 5A shows GlcNAc2 hydrolysis, showing a rapid increase of the resultant product (GlcNAc) with increasing reaction time. Fig. 5B and Fig. 5C show GlcNAc3 and GlcNAc4 hydrolysis. In agreement with the TLC results, GlcNAc3 and GlcNAc4 were consumed more rapidly than GlcNAc2 (Fig. 5A), GlcNAc5 (Fig. 5D) and GlcNAc6 (Fig. 5E). At the end of recording (180 min), no substrate was left from the digestion of GlcNAc3 and GlcNAc4, whereas substantial amounts of the other substrates remained. All substrates were hydrolyzed exolytically, so that GlcNAcn was degraded to GlcNAcn-1 + GlcNAc. The intermediate products, such as GlcNAcn-1 and GlcNAcn-2, were further degraded to the final product GlcNAc. Fig. 5F shows the overall rates of hydrolysis to be in the order: GlcNAc4 GlcNAc3 > GlcNAc5 > GlcNAc6 > GlcNAc2. The substrate-size dependence of the reaction rate can be confirmed from the reaction time-course of extensive hydrolysis of GlcNAc6 over a longer period of incubation (1,500 min (25 h), the upper right panel of Fig. 6); that is, chitin pentamer and dimer accumulated during the course of the reaction, whereas tetramer and trimer were generated only transiently before being hydrolyzed instantaneously by the enzyme. Of the natural glycosides, GlcNAc4 was found to be the best substrate for Vh Nag2. Similar results were reported for β-GlcNAcidase (exoI) from Vibrio furnssii [27]. This enzyme showed its highest Vmax towards GlcNAc4, while the Vmax values decreased 1.1-fold with GlcNAc3 and 1.4-fold with GlcNAc2. Further sequence analysis suggested no putative signal peptide in the sequences of Vh NAg1 and Vh Nag2. Therefore, the two enzymes are suggested to be non-secretory proteins that act intracellularly. In bacterial cells, the transport of chitin oligomers into the intracellular compartments for further degradation by these GlcNAcases could be achieved by specific membrane transporters. It has been proposed for V. furnissii that the uptake of short-chain chitooligosaccharides, such as GlcNAc3 and GlcNAc4, takes place through a chitooligosaccharide-specific channel known as chitoporin [29, 30].
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-11-40/MediaObjects/12858_2010_Article_301_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Product analysis of by quantitive HPLC. Purified Vh Nag2 (50 ng) was added to a reaction mixture containing 5 mM (GlcNAc)n in 0.2 M mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0. The mixture was quenched after the indicated reaction times at 30°C by the addition of 0.1 M NaOH and applied to calibrated HPLC. For each substrate (solid line), the calculated concentrations of the products formed (broken line) are shown. Plots show the hydrolysis of A) (GlcNAc)2; B) GlcNAc3; C) GlcNAc4; D) GlcNAc5; E) GlcNAc6; and F) the estimated hydrolytic rate of each substrate as a function of time. Substrates and products are represented by (GlcNAc) (black circle); (GlcNAc)2 (black square); (GlcNAc)3 (black triangle); (GlcNAc)4 (black diamond); (GlcNAc)5 (white square); and (GlcNAc)6 (white triangle).

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-11-40/MediaObjects/12858_2010_Article_301_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Time-course of GlcNAc 6 hydrolysis catalyzed by Vh Nag2. Upper panels: Experimental time-courses obtained by HPLC determination. The early stage of the reaction time-course is shown in the left panel, and the later stage is shown in the right panel. The reaction conditions are described in the text. Lower panels: Calculated time-courses best fitted to the experimental ones. The calculation was conducted using the rate constants and binding free energy values listed in Table 2.

Kinetic modeling and subsite mapping

Kinetic modeling of the enzymic reaction was carried out based on the reaction scheme presented in Fig. 7. To model the time-course of GlcNAc6 hydrolysis (shown in the upper panels of Fig. 6), numerical calculations were conducted using the differential equation derived from the reaction scheme [31]. At first, the binding free energy changes for the subsites from (-1) to (+4) were estimated roughly by repeating the calculations with various values of the free energy changes. Starting with initial guessed values, optimization of the free energy changes conducted by the modified Powell method [32] was employed using the cost function,
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2091-11-40/MediaObjects/12858_2010_Article_301_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Kinetic model of the GlcNAc 6 hydrolysis catalyzed by Vh Nag2. Mn and E represent free oligosaccharide substrate and the free enzyme, respectively. The subscripts n and i indicate the size of GlcNAc oligosaccharide. A i , B i,n-i , and C n,i represent the enzyme-substrate complexes at various stages as shown in the figure. The gray-boxes indicate the subsites possessing unfavorable positive binding free energy changes (-2 and +4 subsites). At subsite +4, the sugar residue binding is moderately unfavorable, but at subsite -2 sugar residue binding is strictly prohibited. The simultaneous differential equations were derived from the reaction model, and numerically solved to obtain the calculated time-course. The details of the calculation method are described in ref. [31].

F = i n [ ( GlcNAc ) c n , i ( GlcNAc ) e n , i ] 2
(1)

where e and c represent the experimental and calculated values, respectively, n is the number of GlcNAc units in the oligosaccharides, and i the reaction time.

The final iteration of the calculations yielded the values of the rate constants for glycosidic bond cleavage (k+1) for various chain lengths of GlcNAcn. The kcat values obtained were allocated to k+1 for individual oligosaccharide substrates (Table 1). The individual k+1 values were fixed in the modeling calculation. Since no evidence for transglycosylation was obtained from HPLC determination of the enzymic products, this process was not considered in the kinetic model. A much higher value of 50 s-1 was tentatively allocated to the rate constant for hydration k+2. Since Vh Nag2 splits off a monosaccharide from the non-reducing end of the substrate, indicating that subsite (-2) should be the most unfavorable for binding of the GlcNAc residue, we tentatively allocated a high positive value (+7.0 kcal/mol) to the binding free energy change at subsite (-2). Using the fixed values of k+1, k+2, and the binding free energy change of subsite (-2), the values of binding free energies of individual subsites from (-1) to (+4) were optimized on the basis of the experimental time-course (upper panels of Fig. 6). As shown in lower panels of Fig. 6, the calculated time-courses were satisfactorily fitted to the experimental ones, for both the early stage (left panels) and the later stage (right panels) of the reaction, yielding the binding free energy changes of the individual subsites as listed in Table 2.
Table 2

The rate constants and the binding free energy changes estimated from the kinetic modeling calculation.

Substrate

Rate constant (s -1 )

Binding free energy ( k cal mol-1)

 

k +1

k -1

k +2

(-2)

(-1)

(+1)

(+2)

(+3)

(+4)

GlcNAc4-6

0.07-0.1

0.0

50.0

+7.0

-4.5

0.0

-1.1

-0.1

+0.9

The optimization was based on the experimental time-course of hexamer hydrolysis catalyzed VhNag2 (upper panels of Fig. 6).

The TLC and kinetic data suggested that the catalytic pocket of Vh Nag2 probably contains a sequence of four favorable GlcNAc binding subsites, designated (-1)(+1)(+2)(+3). Such an implication is certainly supported by the binding free energy changes obtained by the kinetic modeling. As shown in Table 2, a very high positive value +7.0 kcal/mol for subsite (-2) suggests that there is a large steric hindrance interfering with binding at this subsite. A less positive value of +0.9 kcal/mol of subsite (+4) suggests that the sugar residue binding to this subsite is moderately unfavorable, but still possible. Thus, GlcNAc4 binds to (-1) (+1), (+2), and (+3) more strongly than GlcNAc5 to (-1) (+1), (+2), (+3) and (+4). A low negative free energy change, -0.1 kcal/mol, was estimated for binding at subsite (+3). This is consistent with the fact that the GlcNAc3 binding affinity to the subsites (-1) (+1), and (+2) (Km = 441 μM) is somewhat weaker than that of the GlcNAc4 binding to (-1) (+1), (+2), and (+3) (Km = 329 μM). All of these results clearly indicate that an array of four GlcNAc binding subsites (-1)(+1)(+2)(+3) define the substrate affinity of Vh Nag2. It appears that the GlcNAcases reported to date possess two major types of substrate specificity. The first type has marked preference towards chitobiose, while the other type favours chitooligomers (GlcNAc3-6) over chitodimer. Examples of the former type are hyperthermophilic kodakaraensis KOD1 GlmATK [33], Sm Chb [25], and S. thermoviolacacus NagC [28]. On the other hand, V. furnissii exoI [27], human di-N-acetylchitobiase [34], and Vh Nag2 (in this report) are among the other type. The active site of the second type of GlcNAcases has been demonstrated to contain three to five GlcNAc binding subsites, depending on the substrate specificity of individual enzymes. Multiple sugar-binding-site architecture is not uncommon, as has been demonstrated for other exo-glycosidases such as Aspergillus niger cellobiase [35], a GH-3 enzyme that degrades cellobioase and cello-oligosaccharides into glucose units. The catalytic center of this enzyme has been reported to contain up to five binding subsites. Also, structural studies of the active site of Bacillus halodurans C-125 REX [36], a GH-8 exo-oligoxylanase that hydrolyzes xylooligosaccharides to xylose from the reducing end, revealed three substrate binding subsites.

Conclusions

This study reports the isolation, cloning and recombinant expression of the genes encoding two intracellular GH-20 GlcNAcases from a marine bacterium, Vibrio harveyi type strain 650. Data obtained from TLC and quantitative HPLC suggested that the active GlcNAcase homolog (Vh Nag2) was an exolytic enzyme that degraded chitin oliogmers, releasing GlcNAc as the end product. Kinetic modeling suggested that the active site of Vh Nag2 comprises four GlcNAc binding subsites, (-1), (+1), (+2), (+3). Such subsite identification is strongly supported by kinetic data, which showed chitin tetramer as the most effective substrate for this enzyme.

Methods

Bacterial strains and vectors

V. harveyi type strain 650 was a marine isolate from Greek sea bass and was a gift from Professor Brian Austin, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. E. coli strain DH5α was used for routine cloning and plasmid preparations. pGEM®-T easy vector used for subcloning purpose was a product of Promega (Promega Pte Ltd, Singapore Science Park I, Singapore). The pQE 60 expression vector and E. coli type strain M15 (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) were used for cloning and a high-level expression of recombinant GlcNAcases.

Cloning of the DNAs encoding VhNag1 and VhNag2

Three sets of oligonucleotide primers were designed based on the three putative GlcNAce genes, designated VIBHAR_01265, VIBHAR_03430, VIBHAR_06345) from V. harveyi type strain ATCC BAA-1116 in the CAZy database. However, only two PCR products, namely VhNag1 and VhNag2, were successfully amplified from the genomic DNA of V. harveyi type strain 650. The oligonucleotides used for amplification of VhNag1 DNA are 5'-AGGATCC GGGCAGGGTAAAATC-3' for the forward primer and 5'-AGGAGATCT ATCGGTTAAAGTGTGAAG-3' for the reverse primer. For VhNag2 DNA, 5'-AGGGATCC GAATACCGTGTTGATTTA-3' was used as the forward primer and 5'-AATAGATCTC TTCCACGGTTTACGGTA-3' for the reverse primer. The PCR products of expected sizes (2.3 kbp for VhNag1 and 1.9 kbp for VhNag2) were cloned in the pQE60 expression vector using Bam H I and Bgl II cloning sites (sequences underlined) following the protocol supplied by the manufacturer.

Nucleotide, amino acid sequence and phylogenic analyzes

The nucleotide sequences of VhNAg1 and VhNag2 were determined by automated double stranded DNA sequencing (Bio Service Unit, Thailand Science Park, Bangkok, Thailand). Ambiguous nucleotides were re-confirmed twice before submission to the Genbank database. The amino acid sequence alignment was constructed using ''CLUSTALW'' algorithm commercially available in Lasergene v.7 (DNASTAR, Inc., WI, USA) and displayed using the Genedoc program (http://www.psc.edu/biomed/genedoc/). The putative sequences of VhNag1 and VhNag2 were aligned with the previously published V. harveyi chitobiase [26] together with four bacterial and two human GlcNAcases of known structures.

Protein expression and purification

The full-length Vh Nag1 and VhNag2 DNAs were cloned into pQE60 expression vector and expressed in E. coli M15 host as the C-terminally (His)6-tagged polypeptides. The cells were grown at 37°C in Luria Bertani (LB) medium containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin until the OD600 of the cell culture reached 0.6. Expression was induced by the addition of isopropyl thio-β-D-galactoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 0.5 mM. After 18 h of induction at 20°C, the cell pellet was collected by centrifugation, re-suspended in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, containing 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF), and 1.0 μg/ml lysozyme), and then lysed on ice using a Sonopuls Ultrasonichomogenizer with a 6-mm-diameter probe (50% duty cycle; amplitude setting, 20%; total time, 30 s, 6-8 times). Unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 12,000 × g, 20 min at 4οC. The supernatant was immediately applied to a Ni-NTA agarose affinity column (1 × 10 cm) (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany), and the chromatography was carried out under gravity at 4°C. The column was washed thoroughly with 5 mM imidazole, followed by 20 mM imidazole in equilibration buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0), and then 250 mM imidazole in the same buffer. Three eluted fractions (10 ml each) were collected and analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE [37] to confirm purity. GlcNAcase fractions were pooled and then subjected to several rounds of membrane centrifugation using Vivaspin-20 ultrafiltration membrane concentrators (Mr 10,000 cut-off, Vivascience AG, Hannover, Germany) for complete removal of imidazole. The final concentration of the protein was determined by Bradford's method [38].

Confirmation of recombinant expression by mass spectrometry

The purified Vh Nag1 and VhNag2 (2 μg) were applied in parallel onto a 12% SDS-PAGE gel, and stained with Coomassie blue R-250 after electrophoresis. After destaining, protein bands were subjected to in-gel digestion with trypsin (sequencing grade, Promega) using a standard protocol [39]. The resultant peptides were analyzed by high resolution nanoESI/FTMS by the mass spectrometry facility located at the Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Physiology, Dortmund. Data bank searching was performed with ''Mascot search'' (http://www.matrixscience.com/) for peptide mass fingerprinting.

GlcNAcase activity assays

GlcNAcase activity was determined spectrophotometrically using p NP-GlcNAc (Sigma-Aldrich Pte Ltd., The Capricorn, Singapore Science Park II, Singapore) as substrate or by a reducing sugar assay using GlcNAc2-6 (AMS Biotechnology (Europe) Ltd, Oxfordshire, UK) and colloidal chitin as substrates. For the p NP assay, a 100-μl assay mixture contained the protein sample (50 μg), 125 μM p NP-GlcNAc), and 0.065 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 The enzymic reaction was continued for 10 min at 37°C before being terminated by the addition of 100 μl 3 M Na2CO3. The amount of p-nitrophenol (p NP) released was determined spectrophotometrically at 405 nm in a microtiter plate reader (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Molar concentrations of p NP were calculated from a calibration curve constructed with 0-20 nmol p NP. For the reducing sugar assay, the reaction mixture (100 μl) contained 250 μM GlcNAc2-6 in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 and 200 μg enzyme or 500 μM p NP-glycoside in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 and 100 μg enzyme. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 15 min in a Thermomixer comfort (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany), then heated at 100°C for 10 min. The entire reaction mixture was subjected to 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assay following the protocol described by Miller [40]. Release of the reducing sugars was detected spectrophotometrically at 540 nm and molar concentrations of the released sugars were estimated using a standard calibration curve of GlcNAc (0-500 nmol). For colloidal chitin, the reaction mixture (200 μl), containing 5% (w/v) colloidal chitin (prepared according to Hsu and Lockwood, 1975 [41]), 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and 200 μg enzyme, was incubated at 37°C for 15 min. After centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 1 min to precipitate the remaining chitin, the product concentration in the supernatant (100 μl) was determined by DNS method as described for GlcNAc2-6.

Effects of pH on the enzymatic activity

A discontinuous assay was used to determine the pH profiles of Vh Nag1 and Vh Nag2. The reaction mixtures containing 500 μM p NP-GlcNAc were pre-incubated at 37°C for 5 min at different pH values ranging from 2.5 to 9.0 using the McIlvaine's sodium phosphate-citric acid - KCl buffer system [42], followed by addition of 1 μg Vh Nag1 or 0.5 μg Vh Nag2. After 10 min of incubation, the reactions were terminated with 100 μl of 3 M Na2CO3. The amounts of p NP released were estimated as described for the p NP assay.

Time course of substrate analysis by thin-layer chromatography

Hydrolysis of chitooligosaccharides (GlcNAc2-6) by Vh Nag2 was carried out in a 20-μl reaction mixture, containing 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 2.5 mM substrate and 5 μg purified enzyme. The reaction mixture was incubated at 30°C for 1, 5, 10, 15, 30 min, 3 h or 18 h, and the reaction terminated by boiling for 5 min. For product analysis, five 1-μl aliquots of each reaction mixture were applied to a silica TLC plate (7 × 10 cm), and then chromatographed three times (1 h each) in a mobile phase containing n-butanol:methanol:28% ammonia solution:H2O (10:8:4:2) (v/v), followed by spraying with aniline-diphenylamine reagent and baking at 180°C for 3 min. To determine the time course of chitin hydrolysis, the reaction was carried out in a 150-μl reaction mixture, containing 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 20 mg colloidal chitin, and 50 μg purified enzyme. Subsequent reactions and determination of the reaction products were analyzed by TLC as described for chitooligosaccharide hydrolysis.

Time-course analysis of chitooligosaccharide hydrolysis by HPLC

A reaction mixture (100 μl) containing 1.25 mM chitin oligosaccharide (GlcNAc2-6), 38 μM Vh Nag2 and 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 was incubated at 30°C. An aliquot of 12 μl was transferred to a new microfuge tube containing 12 μl 0.1 M NaOH after 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 180 min, and the enzymic reaction was stopped by snap-freezing in liquid N2 and the mixture immediately stored at -20°C. To quantitatively determine the time-course of substrate degradation and product formation, 15-μl of the reaction mixture was applied to a gel-filtration column of TSK-GEL G2000PW (7.5 × 600 mm, Tosoh) connected with a Hitachi L-7000 HPLC system (Hitachi Koki Co., Ltd, Tokyo). Elution was conducted with distilled water at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min, and the substrate and products were monitored by their absorption at 220 nm. Based on the peak areas obtained from the elution profiles, oligosaccharide concentrations were calculated using a standard curve obtained with authentic saccharide solutions, and then plotted against the reaction time to obtain the reaction time-course.

Steady-state kinetics

Kinetic parameters were determined using p NP-GlcNAc and chitooligosaccharides (GlcNAc2-6) by the reducing sugar assay as described above, with 0-500 μM of each substrate in the reaction mixture. The amounts of the reaction products were determined from a standard curve of GlcNAc (0-1.75 μmol). Kinetic parameter values were evaluated from three independent sets of data using the nonlinear regression function obtained from the GraphPad Prism v.5.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).

Kinetic modeling of substrate hydrolysis

Kinetic modeling of the reaction time-course obtained by HPLC was carried out using the reaction model reported for the Coccidioides immitis family 18 chitinase [43]. The model scheme is shown in Fig. 7. Considering that the enzyme hydrolyzes the oligosaccharide substrate exolytically from the non-reducing end, Vh Nag2 was assumed to have a (-2)(-1)(+1)(+2)(+3)(+4)-type binding cleft, where subsite (-2) should have an unfavorable (positive) binding free energy change. By assuming rapid binding equilibrium, the concentrations of the ES-complexes formed through the individual binding modes (C n,i , B i,j , and A i ) were calculated from the binding constants, which were obtained from the binding free energy values of individual subsites occupied with the sugar residues assuming additivity. Details of the calculation method were described by Honda and Fukamizo [31].

Abbreviations

GlcNAcn or NAG: 

β 1-4 linked oligomers of N-acetylglucosamine residues where n = 1-6

GlcNAcase: 

β-N-acetyl-glucosaminidase

DNS: 

3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid

p NP-GlcNAc p

-nitrophenyl-β-D-N-acetylglucosaminide

IPTG: 

isopropyl thio-β-D-galactoside

ORFs: 

open reading frames

PMSF: 

phenylmethylsulphonylfluoride

TLC: 

Thin Layer Chromatography.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Suranaree University of Technology (Grant no SUT1-102-52-24-08). We are grateful to P. Janning and A. Brockmeyer, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, for nano-HPLC/ESI-FTMS measurements and associated data interpretation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Biochemistry-Electrochemistry Research Unit, Schools of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology
(2)
Department of Advanced Bioscience, Kinki University

References

  1. Wu GJ, Tsai GJ: Chitooligosaccharides in combination with interferon-c increase nitric oxide production via nuclear factor-jB activation in murine RAW264.7 macrophages. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007, 45: 250-258. 10.1016/j.fct.2006.07.025.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Vishu Kumar AB, Varadaraj MC, Gowda LR, Tharanathan RN: Characterization of chito-oligosaccharides prepared by chitosanolysis with the aid of papain and pronase, and their bactericidal action against Bacillus cereus and Escherichia coli. Biochem J. 2005, 391: 167-175. 10.1042/BJ20050093.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Sharon N: Carbohydrates as future anti-adhesion drugs for infectious diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006, 1760: 527-537.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Friedman SJ, Skehan P: Membrane-active drugs potentiate the killing of tumor cells by D-glucosamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980, 77: 1172-1176. 10.1073/pnas.77.2.1172.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Shen KT, Chen MH, Chan HY, Jeng JH, Wang YJ: Inhibitory effects of chitooligosaccharides on tumor growth and metastasis. Food Chem Toxicol. 2009, 47: 1864-1871. 10.1016/j.fct.2009.04.044.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Patil SR, Ghormade V, Deshpande MV: Chitinolytic enzymes: an exploration. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2000, 26: 473-483. 10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00134-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kornfeld R, Kornfeld DS: Assembly of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides. Annu Rev Biochem. 1985, 54: 631-664. 10.1146/annurev.bi.54.070185.003215.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Karamanos Y, Bourgerie S, Barreaud JP, Julien R: Are there biological functions for bacterial endo-N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidases?. Res Microbiol. 1995, 146: 437-443. 10.1016/0923-2508(96)80289-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Myerowitz R: Tay-Sachs disease-causing mutations and neutral polymorphisms in the Hex A gene. Hum Mutat. 1997, 9: 195-208. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1997)9:3<195::AID-HUMU1>3.0.CO;2-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Henrissat B, Bairoch A: New families in the classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino-acid sequence similarities. Biochem J. 1993, 293: 781-788.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Henrissat B, Davies G: Structural and sequence-based classification of glycoside hydrolases. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997, 7: 637-644. 10.1016/S0959-440X(97)80072-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Vocadlo DJ, Withers SG: Detailed comparative analysis of the catalytic mechanisms of beta-N-acetylglucosaminidases from families 3 and 20 of glycoside hydrolases. Biochemistry. 2005, 44: 12809-12818. 10.1021/bi051121k.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Prag G, Papanikolau Y, Tavlas G, Vorgias CE, Petratos K, Oppenheim AB: Structures of chitobiase mutants complexed with the substrate di-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine: the catalytic role of the conserved acidic pair, aspartate 539 and glutamate 540. J Mol Biol. 2000, 300: 611-617. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3906.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Williams SJ, Mark BL, Vocadlo DJ, James MN, Withers SG: Aspartate 313 in the Streptomyces plicatus hexosaminidase plays a critical role in substrate-assisted catalysis by orienting the 2-acetamido group and stabilizing the transition state. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 40055-40065. 10.1074/jbc.M206481200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Drouillard S, Armand S, Davies GJ, Vorgias CE, Henrissat B: Serratia marcescens chitobiase is a retaining glycosidase utilizing substrate acetamido group participation. Biochem J. 1997, 328: 945-949.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Chitlaru E, Roseman S: Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel beta-N-acetyl-D-glucosaminidase from Vibrio furnissii. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 33433-33439. 10.1074/jbc.271.52.33433.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Li H, Morimoto K, Katagiri N, Kimura T, Sakka K, Lun S, Ohmiya K: A novel beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase of Clostridium paraputrificum M-21 with high activity on chitobiose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002, 60: 420-427. 10.1007/s00253-002-1129-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Tsujibo H, Hatano N, Mikami T, Hirasawa A, Miyamoto K, Inamori Y: A novel beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase from Streptomyces thermoviolaceus OPC-520: Gene cloning, expression, and assignment to family 3 of the glycosyl hydrolases. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998, 64: 2920-2924.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Choi KH, Seo JY, Park KM, Park CS, Cha J: Characterization of glycosyl hydrolase family 3 beta-N- acetylglucosaminidases from Thermotoga maritima and Thermotoga neapolitana. J Biosci Bioeng. 2009, 108: 455-459. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.06.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Austin B, Zhang XH: Vibrio harveyi: a significant pathogen of marine vertebrates and invertebrates. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006, 43: 119-124. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01989.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Owens L, Busico-Salcedo N: Vibrio harveyi: pretty problems in paradise. The Biology of Vibrios. Edited by: Thompson FL, Austin B, Swings J. 2006, Washington DC, ASM Press, 266-280.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Suginta W, Robertson PA, Austin B, Fry SC, Fothergill-Gilmore LA: Chitinases from Vibrios: activity screening and purification of chi A from Vibrio carchariae. J Appl Microbiol. 2000, 89: 76-84. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01076.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Suginta W, Vongsuwan A, Songsiriritthigul C, Prinz H, Estibeiro P, Duncan RR, Svasti J, Fothergill-Gilmore LA: An endochitinase A from Vibrio carchariae: cloning, expression, mass and sequence analyses. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2004, 424: 171-180. 10.1016/j.abb.2004.01.017.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lemieux MJ, Mark BL, Cherney MM, Withers SG, Mahuran DJ, James MN: Crystallographic structure of human beta-hexosaminidase A: interpretation of Tay-Sachs mutations and loss of GM2 ganglioside hydrolysis. J Mol Biol. 2006, 359: 913-929. 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.04.004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Tews I, Perrakis A, Oppenheim A, Dauter Z, Wilson KS, Vorgias CE: Bacterial chitobiase structure provides insight into catalytic mechanism and the basis of Tay-Sachs disease. Nat Struct Biol. 1996, 3: 638-648. 10.1038/nsb0796-638.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Soto-Gil RW, Zyskind JW: N,N'-diacetylchitobiase of Vibrio harveyi. Primary structure, processing, and evolutionary relationships. J Biol Chem. 1989, 264: 14778-14783.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Keyhani NO, Roseman S: The chitin catabolic cascade in the marine bacterium Vibrio furnissii. Molecular cloning, isolation, and characterization of a periplasmic beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 33425-33432. 10.1074/jbc.271.52.33425.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kubota T, Miyamoto K, Yasuda M, Inamori Y, Tsujibo H: Molecular characterization of an intracellular beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase involved in the chitin degradation system of Streptomyces thermoviolaceus OPC-520. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2004, 68: 1306-1314. 10.1271/bbb.68.1306.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Keyhani NO, Li XB, Roseman S: Chitin catabolism in the marine bacterium Vibrio furnissii. Identification and molecular cloning of a chitoporin. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 33068-33076. 10.1074/jbc.M001041200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hunt DE, Gevers D, Vahora NM, Polz MF: Conservation of the chitin utilization pathway in the Vibrionaceae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74: 44-51. 10.1128/AEM.01412-07.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Honda Y, Fukamizo T: Substrate binding subsites of chitinase from barley seeds and lysozyme from goose egg white. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998, 1388: 53-65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuhara S, Ezaki E, Fukamizo T, Hayashi K: Estimation of the free energy change of substrate binding lysozyme-catalyzed reactions. J Biochem. 1982, 92: 121-127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tanaka T, Fukui T, Atomi H, Imanaka T: Characterization of an exo-beta-D-glucosaminidase involved in a novel chitinolytic pathway from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 5175-5181. 10.1128/JB.185.17.5175-5181.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Aronson NN, Halloran BA: Optimum substrate size and specific anomer requirements for the reducing-end glycoside hydrolase di-N-acetylchitobiase. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006, 70: 1537-1541. 10.1271/bbb.60183.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Yazaki T, Ohnishi M: Subsite structure of beta-glucosidase from Aspergillus niger and kinetic mechanism of the beta-glucosidase-catalyzed reactions. Glycoenzymes. Edited by: Ohnishi M. 2000, Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, 171-187.Google Scholar
  36. Fushinobu S, Hidaka M, Honda Y, Wakagi T, Shoun H, Kitaoka M: Structural basis for the specificity of the reducing end xylose-releasing exo-oligoxylanase from Bacillus halodurans C-125. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 17180-17186. 10.1074/jbc.M413693200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227: 680-685. 10.1038/227680a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976, 72: 248-254. 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M: Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem. 1996, 68: 850-858. 10.1021/ac950914h.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller GL: Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959, 31: 426-428. 10.1021/ac60147a030.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Hsu SC, Lockwood JL: Powdered chitin agar as a selective medium for enumeration of actinomycetes in water and soil. Appl Microbiol. 1975, 29: 422-426.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. McIlvaine TC: A buffer solution for colorimetric comparison. J Biol Chem. 1921, 49: 183-186.Google Scholar
  43. Fukamizo T, Sasaki C, Schelp E, Bortone K, Robertus JD: Kinetic properties of chitinase-1 from the fungal pathogen Coccidioides immitis. Biochemistry. 2001, 40: 2448-2454. 10.1021/bi001537s.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Suginta et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement